Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Negative voltage regulators...compromised?
Negative voltage regulators...compromised?
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th March 2008, 06:27 PM   #1
hollowman is offline hollowman  United States
diyAudio Member
 
hollowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Default Negative voltage regulators...compromised?

A DIYer recently noted to me that for symmetrical power supplies (e.g., +/- 15VDC), it's best to use two positive regulators, connected in series (like batteries), as opposed to a positive (LM317) and a negative (LM337).

Reason: specs of negative regs, like 337, are inferior to positive regs like 317.

Yet, I continue to see several PS designs for various projects like chip amps and IVs use negative regs. So I wonder how important the spec. diffs. between pos. and neg. regs are for real-world practices?
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2008, 06:33 PM   #2
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi,
irrespective of the quality issue between twin +ve reg and +ve &-ve regs, it is cheaper to build +ve & -ve due to saving the extra winding connection and the extra bridge rectifier that are required for twin +ve.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2008, 06:53 PM   #3
hollowman is offline hollowman  United States
diyAudio Member
 
hollowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Default Measured diffs between 337 and 317

Thx for your reply ...
Quote:
Originally posted by AndrewT
irrespective of the quality issue between twin +ve reg and +ve &-ve regs, it is cheaper to build +ve & -ve due to saving the extra winding connection and the extra bridge rectifier that are required for twin +ve.
Yup -- I noticed the extra parts/cost issue.
Given the diff specs between neg and pos regs, how much measured diff. (e.g. using o'scope or analyzer) is there between the two rails? That is, diffs that are important for HQ audio apps?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th March 2008, 01:37 AM   #4
fernando_g is offline fernando_g  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
I've always used complementary LM317 and LM337, and prior to that LM78xx and LM79xx regulators for my projects which did require dual polarities. Never experienced any problems that I could relate to the supplies.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Negative voltage regulators...compromised?Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High Voltage negative regulators Tweeker Tubes / Valves 3 27th February 2009 01:14 AM
Pre amp voltage regulators help. AMV8 Solid State 19 6th April 2007 10:30 PM
voltage regulators odysseybmx414 Chip Amps 23 2nd January 2006 09:35 PM
Positive regulators for negative supplies? JohnG Solid State 7 4th February 2003 01:28 PM
voltage regulators NAP 160 Digital Source 7 11th August 2002 10:14 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:02 PM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 16.67%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio
Wiki