PFC inductor advice - Page 2 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Power Supplies

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th March 2008, 09:56 AM   #11
Andy F is offline Andy F  Spain
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Northwest Spain
Hi:

I am using a T157-2 iron powder toroidal by now, waiting for some CoolMu samples to try. It works great, but I had to use a lot of turns of wire to get 270uH on that core as it has very low AL.
Anyway, I did it using single wire to have room enough.
When the new cores come I will try with litz wire and simple wire to compare as I need less turns.
The big improvement on my prototype was the use of an hyperfast diode (8ETX06) on output. Now the PFC is feeding a half bridge SMPS to power one 1kw class D amplifier and the results are very good. Now the output voltage is very stable feeding the amplifier(before, the SMPS was not regulated by feedback and the use of the Pfc circuit is a great improvement regarding output voltage). Before the implementation of the PFC the SMPS output voltage had variations of 10 or 15 volts when the amplifier was near clipping but now the greatest variation I have is 4 or 6 volts (the output voltage is around +/-80 volts) without any feedback regulation as I use a quasi-resonant half bridge for the SMPS and it regulates itself in some way, enough for me as I want to use it for class D amps.
I did not notice any startup failure till now but I take note regarding the new chip from IR to replace the IR1150S
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2008, 11:35 AM   #12
luka is offline luka  Slovenia
diyAudio Member
 
luka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in Slovenia :)
Send a message via Skype™ to luka
Default Re: pfc inductor

Quote:
Originally posted by jamesrnz
ok,

with the pfc inductor should it be wound with multiple wire in parallel.

or can it be a solid wire like the out put inductor of an isolated smps?
One or the other, isong one wire will have bigger I2R looses
__________________
home page @ http://www.classdaudio.tk/ @ 24/7 all year long
I FEEL SLOVENIA
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2008, 01:40 PM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
jamesrnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Default non -isolated smps inductors

ok all,
so following the pfc inductor comments.

in order to build non saturating smps's should the transfomer/coil cores of the buck or boost also be a iron core or mpp since they carry a lot of one way dc voltage? so as not to saturate...


  Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2008, 05:22 AM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
EnvisionAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dayton, OH
Default Re: IR1150S PFC

Quote:
Originally posted by MOER
We use this chip in our professional amplifiers and it has serious turn on issues. We also use #18 cores from Micrometals which work well but DO NOT use a core which is too small. Our smallest size is a T175 and MMetals offer a T-200B which is a double stocked T200 core.

The problem with the IR1150S is that on turn on there is not enough dead time and the power device will blow. This is more apparant at 240v AC. We do not use a MOSFETS as IGBTs work so much better. I designed an extra circuit to deal with the PFC on turn on. The input surge issue is now a thing of the past.

IR are designing a new chip which they say will take care of the inrush current issue.

Steve Mantz
Zed Audio Corp.
Wow, that's good to know considering I'm working on a design using that chip. Are you using the OVP pin (sleep mode) to accomplish this? Any additional drive requirements necessary for using IGBTs?
__________________
DCX2496/DEQ2496 Car Audio Conversions
www.envisionelec.net
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2008, 06:38 AM   #15
MOER is offline MOER  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SIMI VALLEY CA
Default IR1150S

No we do not use the OVP pin. One of the issues whcih we have found is that one must not power up the PFC chip UNTIL the bulk capacitors are charged. Due to the fact that our amplifiers are used all over the world, the PFC must accommodate 85-265v AC and this presents some challenges on the start up procedure. The process we use is complex in that the tun on circuits must turn on each section of the power supply (PFC + half bridge + low voltage supplies) in the correct order and the surge limiter must also be switched out at the correct time. Another large issue is the resetting of the supply when AC power is applied. A test which contractors perform on our amplifiers is to turn the power switch off and then instantly turn it on again to see if they can blow up the supply. So I designed a reset circuit that forces the supply to start from zero each time AC power is applied and the it must go through the same turn on cycle each time.

The "Comp" pin is the port which controls dead time and this is the pin one must manipulete for dead time on turn on.

Also note that half bridge supplies are not happy having their PWM chips on and then B+ applied afterwards. They have a habit of blowing up.

IGBTs work far better than Mosfets in both the PFC and the half bridge, they are less expensive and the new generation of IGBTs from Fairchild and IXYS have hyper fast back diodes built in. The trick with IGBTs is to use higher value gate resistors for turn on as compared to that used for Mosfet drive. This reduces EMI substantially. At the output of the PFC right at the cathode of the PFC diode, use a high quality film capacitor to the common line = source of IGBT which reduces EMI as well. I also use a snubber from gate to emitter of the IGBT and this together with the other two "fixes" allowed us to get our amplifier through TEL testing.


Stephen Mantz

Zed Audio Corp.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2008, 06:41 PM   #16
diyAudio Member
 
EnvisionAudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dayton, OH
Default Re: IR1150S

Quote:
Originally posted by MOER
No we do not use the OVP pin. One of the issues whcih we have found is that one must not power up the PFC chip UNTIL the bulk capacitors are charged. Due to the fact that our amplifiers are used all over the world, the PFC must accommodate 85-265v AC and this presents some challenges on the start up procedure. The process we use is complex in that the tun on circuits must turn on each section of the power supply (PFC + half bridge + low voltage supplies) in the correct order and the surge limiter must also be switched out at the correct time. Another large issue is the resetting of the supply when AC power is applied. A test which contractors perform on our amplifiers is to turn the power switch off and then instantly turn it on again to see if they can blow up the supply. So I designed a reset circuit that forces the supply to start from zero each time AC power is applied and the it must go through the same turn on cycle each time.

The "Comp" pin is the port which controls dead time and this is the pin one must manipulete for dead time on turn on.

Also note that half bridge supplies are not happy having their PWM chips on and then B+ applied afterwards. They have a habit of blowing up.

IGBTs work far better than Mosfets in both the PFC and the half bridge, they are less expensive and the new generation of IGBTs from Fairchild and IXYS have hyper fast back diodes built in. The trick with IGBTs is to use higher value gate resistors for turn on as compared to that used for Mosfet drive. This reduces EMI substantially. At the output of the PFC right at the cathode of the PFC diode, use a high quality film capacitor to the common line = source of IGBT which reduces EMI as well. I also use a snubber from gate to emitter of the IGBT and this together with the other two "fixes" allowed us to get our amplifier through TEL testing.


Stephen Mantz

Zed Audio Corp.
Stephen,

Many thanks for your thorough reply. Would you say that the low parts count using the IR1150s was not as advantageous as IR claimed or is this a common problem among many PFC controllers? I was also looking at the L4981 from ST...
__________________
DCX2496/DEQ2496 Car Audio Conversions
www.envisionelec.net
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2008, 07:18 PM   #17
diyAudio Member
 
N-Channel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sol System
Send a message via AIM to N-Channel
Quote:
Originally posted by Eva
Consider either MPP toroids (see Arnold Magnetics and others), RF iron powder toroids (material 2 is the most popular, see www.micrometals.com ) or gapped ferrite and litz wire.

Use the search engine, there are some posts on this subject.
EVA,

Would a T-200-26 work OK? I ask this only because I have a boat-load of #26 toroids lying around, different sizes, and would like to use what I have on hand. THX,

Steve
__________________
-. ---.. -..- ---
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2008, 03:35 AM   #18
diyAudio Member
 
wrenchone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
A #26 core would turn from white/yellow to brown/brown. They are more or less ok from 60Hz to about 25kHz. You see them these days in 60Hz differential inductors for EMI filters, and in coupled chokes for forwards, where they aren't supporting a whole lot of volt-seconds and have a fan blowing right on them. Type 52 has about the same perm with much lower loss, just don't try it in a PFC in E-core form (long-term degradation issues).
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2008, 05:33 AM   #19
MOER is offline MOER  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SIMI VALLEY CA
Default PFC

I have only had experience with the IR chip and some older Unitrode chips. They all suffer this problem. There are other chips from On-Semi, national etc and I see no provision for controlling the turn on of the main switching device when power is applied. Through trial and error and some blown IGBTs I figured out that massive dead time is required on turn on to protect the IGBT and reduce in rish current. However be aware that the turn on surge at 120v as compared to >200v is vastly different. You can get away with no surge supressor at 120v AC but NOT at >200v.

All we do is insert a simple 5 watt 620 ohm resistor in series with the positive leg of the bottom capacitor of the bulk pair (2 caps in series as we use a 1/2 bridge switcher). This resistor is bypassed with a relay once the supply is up and running.

I also keep the PFC disabled during the first 3 seconds of turn on. This allows the bulk caps to charge to some voltage (160 at 120v AC and 320 at 240v AC). Then I release the PFC and allow it to ramp up the main B+ to 385v.

#26 material is absolutely useless for the PFC coil. it has too much loss and the only two materials I recommend from Micrometals is #8 and #18. #8 is more expensive.

DO NOT skimp on the PFC coil because if it saturates then you are in trouble.

Stephen Mantz
Zed Audio Corp.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2008, 05:35 AM   #20
Eva is offline Eva  Spain
diyAudio Member
 
Eva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Near the sea
Send a message via MSN to Eva
As previously mentioned, with 26 material you need to keep the volts*second product low in order to keep core temperature under control. This requires a large amount of turns that usually results in too high inductance (and capacitance) and too low saturation current. If you really want to use your 26 cores, you may try stacking 2, 3 or more of them and using a suitable number of turns so that losses are shared between the cores. Connecting several single-core inductors in series produces the same effect. If you manage to get core temperature under control, it would probably be reliable in the long term.
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Copper coil inductor vs. round core inductor tomchaoda Pass Labs 7 21st September 2011 04:42 AM
Inductor advice MMeche Multi-Way 5 15th February 2008 09:47 PM
air core inductor vs. iron core inductor WBS Planars & Exotics 5 7th May 2007 11:02 PM
Need Advice or Options on Inductor coils speedemon Multi-Way 6 20th January 2007 12:01 AM
Poster in Musical Instrument forum needs bridging advice on BrianGT 4780 advice moving_electron Chip Amps 0 16th February 2005 12:37 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:46 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2