Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Power Supplies
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 2nd February 2008, 05:10 PM   #11
joho is offline joho  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sliedrecht Z-H
Red face screab

ahum,

Thanks Jacco
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (93.6 KB, 2174 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2008, 05:15 PM   #12
joho is offline joho  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sliedrecht Z-H
Hi Hollowman,

I was very busy this day with new regulators and i must go to a concert now. Tomorrow i try to give a serious answer when the alcoholics went out of my head


Gr.
Johan
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2.jpg (80.0 KB, 2133 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2008, 05:17 PM   #13
Zen Mod is offline Zen Mod  Serbia
diyAudio Member
 
Zen Mod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ancient Batsch , behind Iron Curtain
Default Re: screab

Quote:
Originally posted by joho
ahum,

Thanks Jacco

naah
too tidy .......

__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson !
tnx to clean thread ; Cook Book ; PSM LS Cook Book ; Baby Diyaudio FORUM ; BAF Forum & Gallery;I'm dumb
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2008, 08:06 PM   #14
joho is offline joho  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sliedrecht Z-H
Quote:
Originally posted by hollowman


So, bc550/bc560 are your preferred substitutes for the orig authors choice of BC549/BC559, respectively?

Right. But that leaves out the npn BC549C, in the SSR w/CCS schematic (see image posted earlier), whose base is between Vz and 100R. I assume this is changed to BC559C (PNP) for the neg supply.
c560 are your preferred substitutes for the orig authors choice of BC549/BC559, respectively?

Hi Hollowman,

BC550/560 are "lower"noise than the BC549/559 but i think it doesn't matter which one you use in this application.

For the shuntpart of the schematics you need a driver for the mosfet. Please look careful at the schematic in post 6!!!
If you like you can change R4/R8(56R) for the Borbely or Zenmod current source. For me it didn't made any difference but for you???
What preamp do you use? What speakers? What source?

I.M.H.O. the positioning of the loudspeakers and the roomaccoustics do much more than exclusive high audio grade components. So use standard industry components and everything will be o.k.

Gr.
Johan
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2008, 03:47 PM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
hollowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Quote:
Originally posted by joho
What preamp do you use? What speakers? What source?
Not sure why/how these components relate to the discussion but...
Pre-amp/integrated (headphone amps): heavily-modded Van Alstine FET-Valve; heavily-modded Meijer Corda headphone amp; PPA2 DIY headphone amp; modded GoVibe headphone amp (using as "pre-amp" of sorts!)
Speakers: modded Paradigm Export Monitor Mk2; modded Vifa Studio; various DIYs based on projects/plans avail. on the Web. But I mostly use headphones or earphones, like Senn 650, Shure 530, Beyer 880 and Grado 325i
Source: Rarely use analog VPI 19 Jr/Rega 300/Sumiko BP Spec.; mostly use heavily-modded Philips 650, modded Pioneer DV59AVi and heavily-modded MF A324 DAC
Quote:
I.M.H.O. the positioning of the loudspeakers and the room acoustics do much more than exclusive high audio grade components. So use standard industry components and everything will be o.k.
While I agree that those other (and unrelated) high-fidelity standards do matter a lot (esp. re: high-grade/boutique audiophool parts), we're getting off-topic. The topic at hand is comparing/contrasting specific types of shunt regs. Speaking of which, here's another one (mostly based on Ed Simons' design in AudioXpress June 2007):
+/-15VDC, 400mA, MOSFET Shunt Regulator -- schematic
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2008, 07:26 PM   #16
joho is offline joho  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sliedrecht Z-H
Hi Hollowman,

If you mostly use headphones, positioning of speakers and roomaccoustics don't count,that's clear.
What i tried to say is; you can discuss about component/part
choices p.e. bc550 contra some japanese counter part. Or even a bc550 brand philips contra fairchild. If your listening conditions/your golden ears are not very,very good, you hear no difference.(english isn't my native language so i hope you understand me well. If not there is always Jacco).
You're audio set looks serious. You collect headphones?
A friend of mine has the topmodel of grado and i must say it sounds very impressive.

O.k to the point. Different shunt regs... the only thing i can say...
build one and listen.

At the moment i'm listening to a series regulator. It's a two stage design. In fact a zener stage around a current source+emittor follower and a local mosfetfollower with a expensive 0.1uF polyp.cap as last capacitor.
And i like it. It's better than the shuntreg but i'm waiting till the weekend for the end conclusion.

Gr.
Johan
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008, 03:48 AM   #17
diyAudio Member
 
hollowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Quote:
Originally posted by joho
At the moment i'm listening to a series regulator. It's a two stage design. In fact a zener stage around a current source+emittor follower and a local mosfetfollower with a expensive 0.1uF polyp.cap as last capacitor.
And i like it. It's better than the shuntreg but i'm waiting till the weekend for the end conclusion.
Can you post a schematic of this series regulator? Also, do you recommend any particular brand/type of Zener -- both for your shunt reg and this series regulator?
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008, 04:02 AM   #18
hermanv is offline hermanv  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northern California
Default Re: shunt regs+last cap.

Quote:
Originally posted by joho
Hi Gents,

<snip>
As i said, i'm fooling around with different(shunt) regulator configurations but everytime that last cap is the bottleneck.
Yes, the panasonics FC-series are also very good for me. When i swap it for an elna audio grade i become depressive. But in fact we are talking about colouration.
How to solve that?

Gr.
Johan
It is possible to find films at that size for not insane prices (they are big though), but at that current is 100uF really necessary?
http://www.northcreekmusic.com/Zen.htm

How about 200uF film for $20.00
http://www.northcreekmusic.com/Specials.htm
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008, 05:55 PM   #19
joho is offline joho  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sliedrecht Z-H
Default serie reg.

Hello again,

Attached the schematic of the regulator i'm testing/listening to.
You must try different zener/diode combinations to get the output voltage you need. Please also test it with the current you need because there is no feedback and the voltage get's a bit lower when the current raise.
The mostfetfolower is a la Charles Hansen's Ayre V3 if i'm right.
Personally i like Mundorf Suprime cap's but they are not cheap and small. The northcreek cap's are new for me. The price is better than the Mundorfs. For sure when the dollar is low and the euro high. But shipping cost...
I do not prefer any particular brand/type of Zener. When i buy some in the shop at the corner it's always a supprise what you get.

Gr.
Johan
Attached Images
File Type: png ugs_supply_rev3.png (14.2 KB, 2285 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008, 06:13 PM   #20
diyAudio Member
 
Onvinyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
Hi,
zeners as references are pretty noisy. Their Vn can be as high as 2µV/1/2Hz, where even the 1M-Resistor shown has 128 nV!
It is however not so easy to use low noise references since they are normally low voltage. I use bypassed resistor stabliized with a FET CCS, but it is not easy to fix the voltage.
Any idea to circumvent this is welcome, and, at least for high gain circuits, pretty much a must.
I don't see how the proposed local regulator could work. Does it depent on leakage current?
Rüdiger
__________________
"I can feel what's going on inside a piece of electronic equipment. I have a sense that I know what's going on inside the transistors." Robert Moog
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Super Shunt Regulator von Herrn Erno Borbely peranders Power Supplies 8 24th August 2009 09:38 AM
Super shunt regulator: dedicated plans? hollowman Power Supplies 0 20th April 2007 03:41 AM
Super Shunt topology: any hints? Onvinyl Power Supplies 21 19th May 2006 11:48 AM
Regs - Shunt vs Series richie00boy Solid State 4 27th November 2003 07:09 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:33 AM.

Page generated in 0.12604 seconds (83.45% PHP - 16.55% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio