paralleling film caps with electrolytic caps
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 9th March 2012, 01:43 PM #381 tankcircuitnoise diyAudio Member   Join Date: Jan 2012 If there were big resonances AND big spikes in the music to trigger those resonances, you'd see them. Bass tones are poor at causing the "ringing" we're looking for, if the ringing would be at high frequencies. And treble tones are poor at causing base ringing. To search for high-freq ringing, you need (1) a sin-sweep generator providing perhaps 1volt peak-peak or (2) a fast-edge generator, and a 555 "rectangle wave" IC at 1KHz period would be fine; the edges of 555 are faster than 1microSecond, thus serving to stimulate lots of candidate ringing; the fast edges are just like the slap of a hand on the belly of a fat guy---the belly joshes around and "rings" and soon stops because of dampening. or (3) music with fast edges, such as (your call) high trumpet notes? they don't sound like pure tones to me, so probably are good waveforms to search for "ringing". The lowest resonance/ringing frequency would be two of the 2,200uF in a loop with some of the wire. In series in the loop, they become 1,100uF. Assume couple pieces of 4" (0.1meter) wire, which has inductance approximately of MUo * length of wire in meters, or [ 4*pi*10^-7 ] * (0.1 meter) = 4*pi*10^-8 or 12.6 * 10*-8 ===~~~ 10^-7 Henry. Since this is a nice round number, we'll assume the total loop inductance is 10^-7. Resonate freq of 1,000uF (10^-3 Farad) and 10^-7 Henry is 0.159/sqrt(10^-3-7) or 16KHz. All other resonances will be higher. I think you should try some loud high-freq unpure-sine material, or build up a 555 oscillator running at 10,000Hertz. And use the scope to check. The OPA627 has good power-supply rejection at 20,000 and lower http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/opa627.pdf Examine the third row of plots in the section "Typical Performance Curves"; depending on how you've got the opamp connected (don't you hate those weasel words? check out the schematic! and the compensation cap inside) you should have at least 60dB (1000:1 reduction) and maybe 80db (10,000:1) at 20,000Hertz. Thus 1milliVolt of rail-ringing would appear as 1 microvolt between input to opam, to be amplified by whatever gain configuration you are using (Unity?). If we aim for damping factor of approx 1, which also approx Q=1, then Rloss = Z(L at 16KHz) = Z(C at 16KHz). One is easy to remember. Use one. But...what if Q=5, because Rloss varies with temperature or aging or brand_name or Vdd? I like a Q=5, because its dampening, once the ringing has been triggered, is 6dB per cycle. Thus if the initial half-sin wave is 10milliVolts, the following opposite polarity half-sine will be 10mV * 0.70 , and the following same polarity half-sine will be 10mv * 0.7 * 0.7 = 5milliVolts. I can easily predict how fast a Q=5 resonance will decay, and Q=5 does last a while, so coloration is possible IF your PowerSupplyRejection is poor. Back to Q=1. No ringing, thus no sin-response, no coloration, but you may see the actual music or voice waveforms on the VDD, accurately appearing, if the caps are small. [ hmmm I hope this does not become "folklore". ] What Rdampen to use? Rloss = Z(L @ 16KHz) = Z(C @ 16KHz) == 2*pi*16KHz * 100 nanoHenry = 10^+5 * 10^-8 ==> 10^-3 or 0.001 ohm. I expect the wiring resistance, the Caps ESR, or the solder! to provide enough dampening. Happy listening tank
 10th March 2012, 08:13 AM #382 HiFiNutNut   diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2004 Location: Sydney Yes, I have previously gone that path trying to use LTSpice to model all possible RLC in the power supply caps and wires. The pictures were never pretty unless I padded resistance here and there. But in reality, I never like the sound of a power supply with padded resistance. Any resistance added creates ripples which are distortions. I have built more than a few types of line level regulators. So far the best sounding one is Ikoflexer's shunt reg, but it is quite difficult to build. From learning from and tuning the Iko reg, I gained a bit of experience. Now I want to sell one of the active speakers I previously built. I don't want to build a shunt reg in the active crossover, so this time I built a LM317/337 reg. With all the experience I gained from building the Iko reg, this time the LM317/337 regs seem to work fine, actually, very fine. Finding no trace of ringing from my limited scope up to 10Mhz, and hearing the very clean sound from the speakers, I am pretty much sure that even if there are resonances above 10MHz, they would be so mild that don't really affect the sound. I guess keeping the rail and ground paths short, using ground plane or thick wires, is the first step reducing possible resonances. I guess the 3 large 2,200uF has sufficient ESR to form the damping circuit which may reduce the possibility of ringing. Last edited by HiFiNutNut; 10th March 2012 at 08:18 AM.
 23rd April 2013, 02:18 PM #383 starkeyg diyAudio Member   Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Sourhern MI Question on power supply caps Hello, Have been adding a 10 or so microfarad film cap slightly before the main supply caps. Reason I am thinking this would be a good thing is that any voltage spikes get taken by the film caps (more reliable and usually a higher voltage rating I've chosen for this reason). Thinking this would make life easier and perhaps lengthen the life of the electrolytic caps. Any idea if this idea has any merit or problems??? So far it has not caused any difference in sound quality that I can tell.
 23rd April 2013, 02:36 PM #384 DF96   diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2007 No merit, unless you have an unusually high resistance/inductance path between the film cap and the main electrolytics. Minor possible problem: any HF voltage spikes which do make it past the transformer and rectifier will now see a lower impedance path so the HF current could be greater. This means that is it even more important to ensure that the relevant circuit loop has a very small area to reduce inductive coupling into signal circuits - not always easy to do with large PSU components. If you want a bypass, the right place for it is as close to the amplifier output circuit as possible i.e. as far away from the PSU as possible.
Elvee
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Quote:
 Originally Posted by starkeyg Any idea if this idea has any merit or problems???
No merit, just problems.
If you can provide quantitative data about your configuration, I can show you the difference (just a pic of your set-up would already be sufficient to make a rough estimate).
__________________
. .Circlophone your life !!!! . .
♫♪ My little cheap Circlophoneİ ♫♪

 23rd April 2013, 05:46 PM #386 DSP_Geek   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Santa Cruz, California You're probably better off adding RC snubbers to the rectifier, which would reduce a major source of HF noise (ringing on diode cutoff) and also bypass a certain amount of external crud. Here's a previous discussion: Fast Recovery rectifier diodes
 23rd April 2013, 09:09 PM #387 starkeyg diyAudio Member   Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Sourhern MI Hello, Thank you for the feedback. As it hasn't made any difference in the sound (that I can tell) and if it doesn't help lengthen the lifespan of the main caps, seems a waste. Regards, Greg
 12th September 2014, 02:23 PM #388 udailey   Passive Aggressive diyAudio Member   Join Date: Mar 2008 Tom, I have two different choices here I am placing capacitance on my board building something similar to Doug Self's Opamplifier. He simply put a .1uf PET across the rails on each opamp. Actually he had the .1uf going from the negative of one opamp the the positive of the next. Shortest distance traces I imagine is the reasoning there and easier layout. So I can do that but was going to use a midsize tantalum and small ceramic OR I can also use power ground so I would have two tantalums and two ceramics. Your work seems really to incorporate ground here but the opamps never touch ground except through the load. I did see your discussion on the signal passing through the caps. What do you think is the best option. Ground involved or rail to rail with opamps? Uriah __________________ purchase LDRs anytime Also try my Resistor Replacers or LDR based Input Selector Email me. diyldr@gmail.com
 12th September 2014, 03:37 PM #389 udailey   Passive Aggressive diyAudio Member   Join Date: Mar 2008 This board I am laying out is only the output section, using NE5532's massively paralleled and all are in non-inverting buffer position so there is no referencing ground. __________________ purchase LDRs anytime Also try my Resistor Replacers or LDR based Input Selector Email me. diyldr@gmail.com

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Aussie Amplifiers         CSS         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post 12 Cents Parts 4 25th November 2005 09:26 AM xyrium Power Supplies 16 14th October 2005 04:06 PM jhead Parts 0 21st April 2004 10:11 PM MRehorst Swap Meet 3 26th December 2002 10:56 PM gromanswe Parts 0 9th July 2002 08:16 AM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:12 AM.