Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Power Supplies
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th July 2007, 05:04 AM   #21
Eva is offline Eva  Spain
diyAudio Member
 
Eva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Near the sea
Send a message via MSN to Eva
The supply is unregulated, the output inductors are part of a pi filter, so it's not recommended to use duty cycle regulation to reduce output voltage (unless you turn this pi filter into a conventional LC output filter, but then bigger inductors would be required). According to the pictures, the turns ratio of the transformers seem to be 16:6 (correct me if I'm wrong) so the nominal output voltage should be 12*16/6-.5=31.5V (and up to 14.4*16/6-.5=37.9V) per rail. Note that the voltage increases a bit when there is no load and that's probably what you have been experiencing (as you discarded everything after the PSU). Add bleeder resistors to draw 1W or so from each rail and consider changing transformer turn ratios if the idle voltage is still too high. Anyway, note that the voltage will probably drop to +/-30V or less under heavy load, and on the other hand, most amplifier modules can handle higher voltages when they are asked to output little power.
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2007, 11:49 AM   #22
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SIUE, Illinois, USA
eva, why would a pi filter be used in a buck-derived regulated converter? Is it just assumed that the extra filtering prevents the voltage on the first cap from changing too much? otherwise it would seem that you'd be turning on into a pure capacitive load that may have droped significantly in voltage.

anon, paralleling supplies may not be the hard part --getting them to share load is. an imbalence in the references might prevent current flow. if one PSU attempts to force 30V, and the other 30.2V, then one PSU will force 30.2V and the other PSU will idle becasue that is the best action it can take to reduce voltage -- nothing, there is no way for it to force the voltage negative, the voltage just has to fall on its own, which it won't. the supplies can be forced to share load using current feedback in the outer-control loop.
__________________
if only it could be used for good, not evil...
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2007, 01:05 PM   #23
diyAudio Member
 
theAnonymous1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
Eva, you are right on the money; I just counted the turns and it is indeed 16:6.

I now see the light.

Paralleling is not the answer, and neither is adjusting the "duty cycle regulation(?)". I thought adjusting R501 was the answer at first because the one supply did seem to be regulated, but at the cost of the other supply not working at all. Paralleling the two in this state was just masking the non functioning supply.

I put R501 back at 33k and did some load tests. With 13.8v input and a 1k load across each rail the output was around 38.5v. With a 20R load on the outputs they went down to 36v. I don't want to try and draw more current without a heatsink attached.

Well, I learned some valuable lessons here. I should always listen to my more knowledgeable peers, and when someone tells me to rewind a transformer, I should just do it.

I will rewind with 14 turns on the secondary.
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2007, 04:53 PM   #24
diyAudio Member
 
theAnonymous1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
OOOOOOOOOUUUUUUCCCCHHHH!!!!!!!

Man, my fingers HURT! I can't imagine having to do that more than once in a lifetime.

Anyways, I rewound the transformers and all is well. I took too many turns off so the voltage is lower than I wanted, but it's workable. The class-d amps it is going to power needs a minimum of +-20v.

It was a royal PITA soldering and de-soldering the transformers. I was even using a 180w solder gun.

Results....

13.8v In = 29.6v (no load)
13.8v In = 27.8v (20R load)

12.5v In = 26.7v (no load)
12.5v In = 24v (20R load)
note: battery voltage dropped closer to 12v with the 20R load.

Well thank you all for the help. I hope I never have to do that again as long as I live.
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2007, 05:24 PM   #25
luka is offline luka  Slovenia
diyAudio Member
 
luka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in Slovenia :)
Send a message via MSN to luka
Hi

If you use Class D why did you even lower voltage, can't it work at +/-40?

Yesterday I have redone my trafo too, used 2x two wires for each sec, each wire made of 4x 0.5mm. So I had first to cut to size 16 wires of 0.5mm. If you don't know what I made, I made 4 litz wires, each sec with 2 of those. Result? F.... beautiful No heating of wire, no saging of output voltage...worth the energy

Btw, nice job done and you didn't use 20 diodes
__________________
home page @ http://www.classdaudio.co.cc @ 24/7 all year long
I FEEL SLOVENIA
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2007, 05:29 PM   #26
diyAudio Member
 
theAnonymous1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
Luka, the amps are the TA2022 based AMP1-B from 41hz.com. Maximum voltage is +-35v. Current limiting kicks in at >7A, so even +-35v is too high for a 4R load.

I was hoping I could get the output of the supply closer to +-32v @13.8v input. I'll live with what I have now. No way am I redoing the trafos again.
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2007, 05:31 PM   #27
luka is offline luka  Slovenia
diyAudio Member
 
luka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in Slovenia :)
Send a message via MSN to luka
Hi

A ok then, even if you won't listen that loud, your voltages will be more then enough. Great job done again...
__________________
home page @ http://www.classdaudio.co.cc @ 24/7 all year long
I FEEL SLOVENIA
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2007, 05:34 PM   #28
diyAudio Member
 
theAnonymous1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
I'm sure it will be leaps and bounds better than whatever power my head unit is putting out, not to mention quality.

Now all I need to do is repaint the heatsink and do all the wiring.

Click the image to open in full size.
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Voltage regulation for TL494? thunderpld Power Supplies 0 14th March 2009 10:28 PM
reducing voltage rtill Solid State 28 16th January 2009 01:45 PM
car smps based on TL494 himanshuraval Car Audio 52 10th July 2007 08:58 PM
Reducing PSU Voltage hernanstafe Parts 1 9th March 2007 05:14 PM
Best way of reducing heater voltage? showdown Tubes / Valves 14 20th July 2006 07:15 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:31 AM.

Page generated in 0.10945 seconds (81.09% PHP - 18.91% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio