|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: California
|
Here is a description of Alastair Robertson-Aikman's arrangement of 4 Quad ESL 63 speakers. I wonder if he still has the same system.
".....here's a bit about how his two pairs of speakers are set up. The main pair faces forward, while the second pair - positioned behind the front and close to side wall - fire to the sides and produce very little signal; the additional speakers are there just to augment and fill-in the sound." I remember seeing a picture of this setup in either Hi-fi Choice or HiFi News & Record Review many years ago. I was wondering if anyone here has tried a similar setup. (If only I had four Acoustats.) Would this work only in very large rooms like his? Would a similar arrangement be effective for tall speakers like the Acoustats or Magneplanars? The description above is from a posting at the google aus.hifi group: http://groups.google.com/group/aus.h...98ef3b0de61867 A similar reference is at: http://www.quadesl.com/articles/quad_stacking.html |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I see no benefit to that idea... it's rather expensive for some presumed ambience... real stacking of 63s defeats the entire raison d'etre for the design.
Might be cool to make a GIANT version of the 63!! Whenever I have heard the 63s they sound like they are "down the hall" anyhow, to a great extent... so I'm not sure why anyone would want any more "depth" than they seem to already have. Others may have had different experiences with them however. The old Hafler "matrix" center channel seems like a better idea...? _-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. -- |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
In all honesty,
i don't have the guts to do that. I know about the arrangement, also read the articles a very long time ago. Considering that a few inches difference in vertical position have such a great impact, i've been very sceptical about stacking 2 of them. (i can not imagine anyone running the 63 without the stands) The only attraction for me is adding a second set of ESL63's through a Xover as subs for that little bit extra. I haven't stumbled on a decent set, and 99 of 100 a single set is plenty loud for me, so it's still on the Santa list.( i sometimes wonder what size living room people have or what kind of job they had in their previous life)
__________________
Looks like Sponge Bob has killed another thread. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Robertson 4010 module/diagram | Praudio | Solid State | 2 | 30th September 2009 03:25 PM |
| Fletcher Munson Vs Robertson Dadson | inertial | Multi-Way | 4 | 26th March 2009 10:52 AM |
| Robertson 4010 Schematic | al2002 | Solid State | 1 | 13th April 2006 08:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08626 seconds (75.41% PHP - 24.59% MySQL) with 10 queries |