Open Baffle - What's Your Image Size ? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Planars & Exotics

Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th May 2006, 04:25 PM   #1
Will is offline Will  Malaysia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Default Open Baffle - What's Your Image Size ?

What's your experience with the projected vocal image size from your open baffle if the overall baffle width is large - somewhere > 20" ?

Just to give a little background on my indecision, I have with me right now, 4x18" heavy duty pro drivers for the dipole bass, a pair Jordan JX92 and a pair of Aurum Cantus G2Si.

Also with me is a driverack DBX PA to perform the active x-over and eq stuffs. Amplification is a DIY 2 x 4 channel gainclone monoblocks in balanced configuration.

I am very particular about vocal image size such that it should just be as large a human's mouth and not any more bloated.

Which configuration should I build my dipoles ? ALA Linkwitz Orion or ALA JAMO R 909 (using a single large ~20" baffle) ? Can the Jamo configuration give me the focus I need ? If it can I'd be very happy cos' the consruction is very straight forward.

Experiences please...
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2006, 01:34 AM   #2
Will is offline Will  Malaysia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Kuala Lumpur
bump...
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2006, 02:08 AM   #3
lndm is offline lndm  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
I haven't built a dipole, but I once built a large baffle for BSD compensation issues.

People say to me, you need a small baffle to get good imaging; and I think, it's the same thing going on above and below the wrap around frequency, just a different frequency. Virtually all baffles do this at a frequency that we are likely to consider critical.

I feel that wide speakers can image. I think it has more to do with the speaker as a whole, than the baffle width alone.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2006, 06:15 AM   #4
Will is offline Will  Malaysia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Yes I also think it has to do with the speaker as a whole (phase relationship and x-over freq) that affects the image size. I just need more confirmation.
You see, there are 2 contrasting designs between the Orion and Jamo . Orions using large 8" mid driver with a considerable small baffle wherelse the Jamo using a 4" mid into a large baffle.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Minimum size for open baffle driver? Javachip Multi-Way 2 28th June 2007 01:06 PM
Australians- what solid timbers for baffle? (open baffle loudspeaker) tktran Multi-Way 13 30th November 2004 12:09 AM
open baffle loudspeakers and room size Russell Sit Multi-Way 29 7th July 2004 05:44 AM
Small Size Open Baffle Question Gunawan W Multi-Way 13 31st December 2003 08:55 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2