Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Planars & Exotics
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th March 2006, 06:51 AM   #21
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uitgeest
Quote:
Originally posted by Tenson
350Hz? I am very surprised. Do you have some measurements for this system? I’d be interested to see them.
Not that surprising, because B&G recommends a -12db filter at 400/500hz. That makes 350hz with -24db not a problem.
http://www.partsexpress.com/pdf/264-713.pdf page 5
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2006, 01:11 PM   #22
Tenson is offline Tenson  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kent
You must listen VERY quietly? Do you not also find the response starts to roll-off a fair bit above that, or does the slightly large baffle fix that? With a 23cm x 23cm baffle you can see on my plots it only extends to about 700Hz.

I think we definitely have different taste
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2006, 02:20 PM   #23
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uitgeest
Quote:
Originally posted by Tenson
You must listen VERY quietly? Do you not also find the response starts to roll-off a fair bit above that, or does the slightly large baffle fix that? With a 23cm x 23cm baffle you can see on my plots it only extends to about 700Hz.

I think we definitely have different taste
I had the same feeling when I tried it, but baffle step and the larger baffle helped to keep it flat. No dips and smooth take over by the woofer. Baffle is 35 X 35cm. My wife does not think I listen quietly....

Before this I listened to the Scanspeak Reference Monitor which is flat as possible. So my reference is o.k.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2006, 04:13 PM   #24
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uitgeest
Reponse of my Neo8PDR in open baffle (all between -3db/+3db)
[IMG]Click the image to open in full size.[/IMG]

(Low 16khz has to do with microphone)
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2006, 05:10 PM   #25
Tenson is offline Tenson  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kent
Thanks, but surely that is the applied EQ, not the actual response of the drivers? Is that a DriveRack?
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2006, 05:23 PM   #26
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uitgeest
Quote:
Originally posted by Tenson
Thanks, but surely that is the applied EQ, not the actual response of the drivers? Is that a DriveRack?
You are right it is the applied EQ, so you have to invert!!
I don't use the EQ for the Neo, because it is a very flat response. I only use a Behringer DSP1124P for low channels to correct acoustics (<350hz).
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2006, 05:41 PM   #27
Tenson is offline Tenson  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kent
Do I take it that you targeted a flat response and told it to auto EQ?

Where did you take the measurements? Just wondering how much 'room' there is in the measurement.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2006, 05:48 PM   #28
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uitgeest
Two places. At 1 meter and at the listening position (+/- 3 meter). Listening position is leading for me (that is what I hear).
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2006, 08:30 PM   #29
cph2000 is offline cph2000  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: copehagen
I have heard this unit in the Martin Logan mosaic speaker (neo8 + neo3 in a diploe with a 8" metal woofer crossing rather low at 450 Hz and 3200Hz) - it was very musical and open - a speaker I could live with !

This might just be a tricky driver to use, but it can sound good !
__________________
.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2006, 09:47 AM   #30
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Italy
Hi Jeroenkv,
Outstanding performance!!
I am surprised because my Neo8PDR measure quite different...
With a baffle 27cm wide and a big rear closed box(stuffed) mine are flat 800-5500Hz, at 400Hz = - 8 dB plus the peak at 12KHz is another
+ 8 dB. (Anechoic simulated) Good agree with BG data.
Now you are dipole and sure you have done great work with driver position/offset/baffle and also you are" in room measurement", but the difference is "suspect" to my eyes.
How much precision can have the DSP8024 ?
Anyway best two measuring more than one less!

Cheers,
Inertial
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Neo3 and Neo8 - how should they be used? Spasticteapot Multi-Way 1 21st May 2011 01:34 AM
Mounting the Neo8 fiat79 Multi-Way 2 22nd July 2008 02:07 PM
B&amp;G Neo8's carstereogeek Car Audio 3 9th May 2006 07:19 PM
Looking for 1 Neo8 for cheap. JoeBob Swap Meet 0 7th September 2004 11:50 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:45 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 27.27%)
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio