Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Planars & Exotics
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 31st May 2006, 06:32 PM   #21
amt is offline amt  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: oregon
Default and the text..

Couldnt translate this since it was graphical and I dont have OCR software.

amt
Attached Images
File Type: jpg dipol2a.jpg (85.7 KB, 731 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2006, 06:40 PM   #22
Kensai is offline Kensai  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St. Louis
Send a message via AIM to Kensai
Neo3 in dipole for sure. Couldn't stand the sound of the things with their back cups still on. Of course, you can't cross them over as low without them, but you seem to be using them for supertweeter duty so it will absolutely not be a problem.

Kensai
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2006, 07:09 PM   #23
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Thanks Kensai, you are the second person who has recomended dipole so it will be done. I asked this because I have heard of some problems with dipole tweeters however those were specific cases.

In addition I have read that if M-T are dipole then W should be dipole. I really dont want to do this though, so is an ML-TQWT with a rear firing port going to bring the monopole behavior of a TL closer to the dipole nature of the M-T. My main concern is the figure 8 radiation of dipole and its reduced energy bouncing off my concrete walls from ~700hz and up while there is a spherical wavefront from 700hz down. I suppose this would cause alot of low frequency reflections off the wall muddying up this range. These two 8's "should" give me an f3 in the mid 20's in a TL w/o room gain(orginal goal), what size of baffle would I need to get an f3 of ~40hz in dipole? I will be building a sub for HT however I would like the mains to be able to reproduce the full audio spectrum on their own.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2006, 12:14 PM   #24
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Crawford, Georgia, US
Quote:
...if M-T.... ...so is an ML-TQWT...
Does M-T = Mid-Tweet? and what does ML-TQWT mean?

on another note you could (actively) XO the BG 8 @ 700 with little consequence. just my $0.02

Tony
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2006, 09:59 PM   #25
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Yes M-T is mid-tweet, W is woofer

ML-TQWT = Mass loaded- Tapered Quarter-wave tube.
aka type of Transmission Line.
Quote:
on another note you could (actively) XO the BG 8 @ 700 with little consequence
There will be no biamping, I know it will simplify my project however I will not buy a bunch of amps retail and do not have the time or experience to build them, now anyways.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2006, 04:07 PM   #26
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Crawford, Georgia, US
any idea how the BG would sound "screwed" to the front of an 11 " high, 22" wide baffle (MTM[MBGM or W/BG/W!])
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2007, 12:32 AM   #27
Ang is offline Ang  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Hi - I'm contemplating a similar 2-woofer design. Has the bass integration worked out well for you and how long is your tl? Thanks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2007, 02:55 AM   #28
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Actually with my senior year of Mechanical Engineering studies I have not completed the speakers, I can say however that the design has been adjusted to be full dipole. With this new plan I will now use a 15" Dayton IB in a 22" U-frame for bass and a radiused baffle for the two daytons. See pic
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mains.jpg (28.5 KB, 487 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2009, 08:28 AM   #29
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Default Build with B&G Neo 8

Hi, I'm new here, Building a small 5.1 with the B&G Neo 8's. Thanks for the info on the XO's. Was curious how your build turned out. I'm just getting started, Still waiting on the speakers to come...lol Using 4 1/2 inch 4 ohm Boston Acoustics to fill in my bottom end down to 55 Hz. Thanks guys for your pioneering work.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS-16 Dayton Pt 2 Planar tweeters Badge Swap Meet 0 4th December 2007 08:26 PM
MCM 55-1170 or Dayton classic 6.5"(295-305) ? percy Multi-Way 2 21st July 2007 12:27 AM
FS: 15-inch Dayton Classic IIs jmikes Swap Meet 0 12th March 2007 01:16 PM
dayton 10" classic woofers for PA... nerd of nerds Multi-Way 13 29th May 2006 02:24 AM
dayton pt2 planar tweeter huj69 Planars & Exotics 8 22nd December 2001 03:25 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:20 AM.

Page generated in 0.09278 seconds (78.89% PHP - 21.11% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio