Electrostatic speakers, real ones and...Martin Logan - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Planars & Exotics

Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th September 2002, 10:21 PM   #1
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
 
peranders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Blog Entries: 4
Default Electrostatic speakers, real ones and...Martin Logan

Hi!

Can anyone explain the difference between a electrostatic speaker with high resistance diaphragm and with low like Martin Logan? Is it an advantage with "sticky" electrons.

Is this an old Quad?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg dcp_2874_.jpg (51.9 KB, 1035 views)
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me
Super Regulator SSR03 Group buy
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2002, 11:13 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: France
I thought M-L had a high-resistance diapragm - I used to own a CLS mark 1, where the diapragm was coated with carbon powder, resulting in a high resistance coating (approx 100 kohm, if my memory serves me well)
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2002, 02:30 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
MRehorst's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
A high resistance diaphragm is used for ESLs to maintain "constant charge" operation. By having a very high resistance, the charge on the diaphragm is prevented from moving toward the center of the diaphragm when the diaphragm is deflected toward one stator or the other by the audio signal.

If the charge were allowed to move (low sheet resistance diaphragm), at extremes of excursion all the charge would move to the center of the diaphragm so only the central area of the diaphragm would be driven and the result would be distortion.

I believe Martin-Logan uses a vacuum deposition process to put an extremely thin metallic coating on the diaphragm. Whatever the method used, it is a very high resistance coating.

MR
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2002, 02:32 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
MRehorst's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
No, it's not one of the Quad 57s. Not an ESL63 either. Could be one of the newer models (I haven't seen their guts), or someone else's speaker altogether.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2002, 03:59 AM   #5
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
Quote:
Originally posted by MRehorst
No, it's not one of the Quad 57s. Not an ESL63 either. Could be one of the newer models (I haven't seen their guts), or someone else's speaker altogether.
The newer models are close enuff to the 63 that you'd recognize a family resemblance, so these are another maker. I assume the damped part in the middle are tweeter panels?

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2002, 06:01 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern California
Angry Graphite

Over the years graphite has been the conductive coating of choice for many ESL makers. Graphite it a poor choice for everyone but the makers, guaranteeing a 100% failure rate. High voltage on the system will eventually drive the carbon (graphite) off as carbon dioxide.

Cyclotronguy
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2002, 08:44 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
MRehorst's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Eventually like when? I am still waiting on drivers I built 12 years ago to stop working.

No I haven't had them biased continuously for 12 years, but the force produced by the electric fields in the speakers is very weak compared to the force used to rub the graphite into the film.

The graphite coating will outlast foam speaker surrounds, belts and lubricants used in tape machines, esoteric CD players, and turntables. It will outlast most pots, many switches, most electrolytic capacitors, vacuum tubes, and a lot of other materials found in audio systems.

Graphite works just fine and lasts a long, long time.

MR
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2002, 08:47 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
MRehorst's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Uh, as to carbon dioxide...

I've never heard of graphite being converted to CO2 in a high voltage field. Do you have any sort of technical reference for that?

MR
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2002, 09:08 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: France
Default graphite coating

Yes,cyclotronguy is right - I had the stators on my Martin Logan CLS's replaced twice. Once was for delamination, and the other time was most likely due to the carbon issue. That is why ML went to the molecular deposition process (incidently, this is done for them by PPG corporation, using the same process used to deposit heating films onto aircraft winshields, for anti-icing protection).

It is also tricky to achieve a uniform resistance using carbon, since it is not a controllable process - it is easy to end up with more carbon on one portion of the diaphragm.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2002, 09:32 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern California
Sorry, I no longer have access to the documentation; it belongs to my previous employeer.

Part of their normal operation required frequent fabrication of high purity carbon into electrostatic deflectors. The carbon and documentation came from a small branch of Union Oil that supplied the carbon in various forms.

Rate of re-dox was a time, charge, pressure, mole relationship; proportional to time and charge, inverse for pressure.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Martin Logan CLX distortion bolserst Planars & Exotics 6 12th August 2009 06:07 AM
amp for martin logan quest slr 5000 Pass Labs 2 8th June 2009 06:30 PM
martin logan's dsiroky Pass Labs 17 16th April 2007 10:13 AM
martin logan csl flodge Planars & Exotics 12 13th November 2005 02:59 PM
B&G NEO3 and NEO8 in Martin Logan speakers ?? cph2000 Multi-Way 3 7th March 2004 08:03 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:23 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2