
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  The diyAudio Store  Gallery  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
19th May 2013, 09:35 PM  #61  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Quote:
1) HFres = series resonance between capacitive load and leakage inductance resulting in impedance minimum. 2) LFres = parallel resonance between capacitive load and primary inductance resulting in impedance maximum. In either case, the resonance frequency is proportional to 1/sqrt(LC). So, if C is increased by a factor of 2 with L remaining constant, resonance frequency decreases by sqrt(2) = 1.414. Note that the total C used for this calculation would be the sum of the transformer winding capacitance and the externally connected capacitive load. In the case of your measurements for capacitive loads of 300pF & 460pF, it would be expected that the resonance frequencies would decrease by 10%  20% depending on the transformer winding capacitance. However your measurements show decreases of 60%  100%. Any thoughts on what is causing this discrepancy between theory and measurement? 

19th May 2013, 09:59 PM  #62 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto and Delray Beach, FL

Wait a minute.....
if those curves are developing peaks as a result of changes in load (as well as quite peaked inputimpedance curves and marked resonances right in the treble region), how can the panel output be flat? Hard to say what load our panels are presenting isn't it? Aren't we looking for flat (or at least, linear) voltage to the ESLs? Ben
__________________
Dennesen ESL tweets, DaytonWright ESL (1103200Hz), mixedbass Klipschorn (28110), and giant OB using 1960's Stephens woofer (18110); Behringer DSP. HiFi aspirations since 1956 Last edited by bentoronto; 19th May 2013 at 10:03 PM. 
19th May 2013, 10:30 PM  #63 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

In general yes, we are looking for linear voltage output(ie frequency independent amplitude) at the secondary of the stepup transformer. The peaks and dips in the impedance won't affect the output voltage if the primary is driven by a low impedance source, which fortunately most amplifiers are. However, the peaks and dips in the impedance have a direct affect on the current drawn from the amplifier at different frequencies when it is producing the linear voltage response. Frequencies where the impedance is low require more current from the amplifier than frequencies where the impedance is high.

20th May 2013, 09:17 AM  #64  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Yes

Maybe my amplifier is one of the reasons. It has a 3dB point of 70kHz so the high frequencies are not very reliable.
Quote:


Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Subwoofers and ESL's  Vaughan  Subwoofers  22  28th October 2012 09:28 PM 
are ESL's, planars etc for me?  mrkramer  Planars & Exotics  30  28th July 2010 12:55 PM 
ESL's and humidity?  Few  Planars & Exotics  10  6th August 2007 07:09 PM 
class t driving esl's  snivit  Class D  4  4th August 2005 03:20 AM 
What amp best for ESL's..?  Adam  Solid State  17  30th September 2002 03:33 AM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 