|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
|
i am using a neo3 tweeter crossed over from active crossover around 5khz...just to be safe i have put a capacitor of 8uf in series with it....
amp -> capacitor ->neo3... amp i had a B&k lying around it is 125 wpc which is way too much... is this safe way to use it..... |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bremerton, WA.
|
An 8uF capacitor on that tweeter yields a cutoff right in 5khz neighborhood. So, it's essentially additive with your active crossover and creating an increase in the acoustic roll-off of the filter. Which may be an issue for you?
Unless your amplifier is not well-behaved, I'd go without the capacitor. Those tweeters are fairly rugged. Dave. |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
|
Quote:
V |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
http://www.bgcorp.com/PDFs/FS-420%20...20sheet%20.pdf 5khz? Don't use the cap.
__________________
It's not what you don't know that causes trouble. It's what you do know that just ain't so..Mark Twain Last edited by Remlab; 16th September 2012 at 07:09 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orlando, FLA
|
I vote for a large cap around 30-40Mfd just to be safe unless you know for certain that the amplifier has good fault protection and will not shoot massive DC out the speaker terminals if it ever dies. Call B&K and ask someone technically inclined there.
Greg |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bremerton, WA.
|
I vote against a large cap.
![]() Series "protection" caps no longer become protection if their value is too large. Considerable deflection could be caused in a fragile tweeter (the Beo 3 not being that fragile) while the capacitor charges/discharges with slow moving turn on/off transients. The 8uF capacitor is perfectly fine....IF it's roll-off characteristic is designed into the target acoustic crossover. Cheers, Dave. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
|
Ok now another part i am getting Neo3 for my desktop and Neo8 for my nearfield PC listening...
i read a lot and didnt saw much of difference between two ...that Neo8 can go lower then neo3... any other inputs and same question what capacitance to provide some safety around it... i have a Seas 1141 and i plan to cross keep seas from 45-3000 and Neo8 from 2000 -20Khz i will be using active crossover for this as well... and this will be open baffle... |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| active crossover - need tweeter block cap if using LM3886 ? | linuxworks | Chip Amps | 14 | 25th December 2010 05:01 PM |
| FS: BG neo3 tweeter | Ang | Swap Meet | 2 | 15th May 2007 11:27 AM |
| Active Crossover for helper tweeter | Zero One | Full Range | 8 | 18th June 2006 07:52 PM |
| Using a ribbon tweeter with an active crossover | sardonx | Planars & Exotics | 19 | 18th June 2005 04:21 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |