Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Planars & Exotics
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th May 2012, 02:27 AM   #201
Remlab is offline Remlab  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mission Viejo Ca
Greg
In my acoustically bright room, the controlled dispersion of the Neo 10 run as a mid tweet works quite well. Like I mentioned before though, the dispersion of the neo 10 is much better than that of even the smallest electrostatic device. But it still definitely needs to be listened to on axis..
Seth

Last edited by Remlab; 14th May 2012 at 02:30 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2012, 11:46 AM   #202
Remlab is offline Remlab  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mission Viejo Ca
Quote:
Originally Posted by Remlab View Post
Greg
In my acoustically bright room, the controlled dispersion of the Neo 10 run as a mid tweet works quite well. Like I mentioned before though, the dispersion of the neo 10 is much better than that of even the smallest electrostatic device. But it still definitely needs to be listened to on axis..
Seth
"Dispersion" white paper by Roger Sanders..
Dispersion White Paper
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2012, 01:02 AM   #203
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orlando, FLA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Remlab View Post
"Dispersion" white paper by Roger Sanders..
Dispersion White Paper
Meh....

Some of it is good and some is marketing to sell his style of speaker. To say that his planar dipole only sends ONE sound to the rear and then it bounces around enough to sufficiently attenuate it that ours brains ignore it is BS.

Greg
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2012, 01:12 AM   #204
Remlab is offline Remlab  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mission Viejo Ca
Quote:
Originally Posted by studiotech View Post
Meh....

Some of it is good and some is marketing to sell his style of speaker. To say that his planar dipole only sends ONE sound to the rear and then it bounces around enough to sufficiently attenuate it that ours brains ignore it is BS.

Greg
In regards to that particular statement, I totally agree with you. Oversimplifying a concept to get the message across to laymen can cause a lot of confusion( It can also help sell your product..)..
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2012, 01:43 AM   #205
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orlando, FLA
Wishing the Neo8S was out last year. I would have used 4 per baffle and put them in a ring AROUND the Raal kind of like a virtual coax. Just got a pair to test. Much improved low range over the regular Neo8. I will be using them in a 3 way, fully active studio monitor project this summer. Raal 70-20XR, Neo8S and Scan Speak 10".

Greg
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2012, 05:09 AM   #206
Remlab is offline Remlab  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mission Viejo Ca
Greg
Did you send the 8-s' to Zaph for testing?
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2012, 06:20 AM   #207
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orlando, FLA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Remlab View Post
Greg
Did you send the 8-s' to Zaph for testing?
It didn't even cross my mind this time. Too bad. I could do a test btw my regular PDR version and the S. Same box, same levels, etc...
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2012, 07:26 AM   #208
Remlab is offline Remlab  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mission Viejo Ca
Quote:
Originally Posted by studiotech View Post
It didn't even cross my mind this time. Too bad. I could do a test btw my regular PDR version and the S. Same box, same levels, etc...
He's testing drivers right now if your interested..
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2012, 08:35 PM   #209
Remlab is offline Remlab  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mission Viejo Ca
After listening to the Neo 10's as a mid tweet for a while, I have come to the conclusion (through deduction) that lower crossover points introduce audible intermodulation distortions(This is probably what you were hearing, Greg) to the upper frequencies. I found that the higher you raise the crossover point, the less the upper frequencies are affected by this mildly "zingy" artifact. In fact, with the higher crossover point, the zingyness totally disappears, with the highs being incredibly pure sounding. So ultimately the Neo 10 can be used either as a "controlled dispersion" mid tweet crossed over at above 600hz, or in a more conventional fashion from 300hz to around 3.5khz but no higher..
Here is an excellent description of TIM in loudspeakers..
http://www.neumann-kh-line.com/neuma...?Open&term=TIM
Seth

Last edited by Remlab; 18th May 2012 at 08:43 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st May 2012, 07:58 AM   #210
Remlab is offline Remlab  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mission Viejo Ca
Quote:
Originally Posted by Remlab View Post
After listening to the Neo 10's as a mid tweet for a while, I have come to the conclusion (through deduction) that lower crossover points introduce audible intermodulation distortions(This is probably what you were hearing, Greg) to the upper frequencies. I found that the higher you raise the crossover point, the less the upper frequencies are affected by this mildly "zingy" artifact. In fact, with the higher crossover point, the zingyness totally disappears, with the highs being incredibly pure sounding. So ultimately the Neo 10 can be used either as a "controlled dispersion" mid tweet crossed over at above 600hz, or in a more conventional fashion from 300hz to around 3.5khz but no higher..
Here is an excellent description of TIM in loudspeakers..
Intermodulation Distortion
Seth
I hooked my 50 watt tube amplifier up to the Neo 10's just to make sure that it wasn't the solid state amplifier causing the "Zingyness" problem in the upper frequencies. I'm going to listen again to them for a few days with a 300hz high pass filter to rule that possibility out. They probably should have been hooked up to the tube amp all along. This amp should love the Neo 10's purely resistive 8 ohm impedance. Let's see what happens..

Last edited by Remlab; 21st May 2012 at 08:01 AM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F/S (3) BG NEO:10 Planar Magnetic Panels rubicon Vendor's Bazaar 1 31st December 2011 05:39 PM
BG Neo 10 (Neo10) vs. Alcons RB401, SA8535, ESS AMT, or Beyma's TPL-150 tiefbassuebertr Multi-Way 1 6th December 2011 12:54 AM
BG NEO 10 pair as new inertial Swap Meet 20 31st January 2009 06:20 PM
Bg neo 10 measured inertial Multi-Way 12 7th October 2008 05:42 PM
BG neo 10 measured inertial Planars & Exotics 0 30th September 2008 09:00 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:49 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 27.27%)
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio