Advantages and disadvantages of multi-layer ESL? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Planars & Exotics

Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th September 2011, 05:25 AM   #1
Nevod is offline Nevod  Russian Federation
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Send a message via ICQ to Nevod
Default Advantages and disadvantages of multi-layer ESL?

There are two well-known advantages of multi-layer ESLs: lower mechanical resonance due to higher weight of coupled diaphragms leading to better deep bass recponce, and higher sensitivity, though it comes from higher capacitance.

Heavy coupled diaphragm also reduces air damping factor, and higher pressure generated by electrical fields compensates higher diaphragm mass. This, I think, is what attributes to better transients (as heard by some) of multi-layer ESLs compared to ordinary ones. Some people also say that ESLs(ordinary) blur peaks of signals and do not sound as emotional on these moments as dynamic drivers.

The known disadvantage is that on higher frequencies, phase lag is present between front and rear diaphragms due to limited speed of sound. Systems wigh many layers and high diaphragm-diaphragm distances are unable to reproduce highs therefore.

I'd like to know though, how this effect is heard in less borderline conditions? For example, two diaphragms, D-D distance of 2.5 mm, hence phase lag at 20 kHz is ~55 degrees. High enough to greatly distort waveform on 'scope, but how would our ears percieve that?

What other disadvantages the multi-layer ESLs have?
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2011, 02:32 PM   #2
oshifis is offline oshifis  Hungary
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Is it the ESL version of Isobarik? Then it must have increased air mass and hence poor HF response...
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2011, 02:09 AM   #3
Nevod is offline Nevod  Russian Federation
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Send a message via ICQ to Nevod
oshifis,
Don't really know how it relates to isobaric, but in dynamic isobarics distance between drivers is significant, while in ESL's, they are just a few millimeters apart, so the air mass shouldn't play a big role.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2011, 09:14 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
JonasKarud's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
I've built a few ESL:s with double isobaric membranes in the bass and a single one for the midrange and highs. I was inspired by an article in a now deceased American HiFi magazine called "Audio". Listen to a pair of M-L CLX and you will understand the advantages of double bass membranes...
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2011, 02:31 AM   #5
Nevod is offline Nevod  Russian Federation
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Send a message via ICQ to Nevod
JonasKarud,
Thanks! I've read that you have also made dual-diaphragm headphones, since they're supposedly fullrange, I'd like to know if you have found some problems on highs compared to single-diaphragm design?

On second thought, phase difference due to different distances from ear to different driver regions would be way higher than difference from inter-diaphragm distance. Though, that difference increases gradually from zero, while second diaphragm is always there. Hmm...
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2011, 03:33 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: toronto
The CLX is very, very good at LF speed and detail - yes needs a well integrated subwoofer to fil in fundamentals of the the lowest frequencies and move air, but above 56 hz is amazing for lack of box resonance, fast bass dynamics, and detail.

Last edited by ticknpop; 7th September 2011 at 03:36 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2011, 09:24 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
JonasKarud's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
I enclose a picture of an early prototype of an "ISO-ELS"...

By feeding the signal current to the furthest back stator through a 68K resistor, the isobaric function was limited to the bass region, where it was needed most..

The Neo tweeter was there just for comparison.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg aaS7300267 - Copy.jpg (118.6 KB, 109 views)
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MTTM advantages/disadvantages? jjkozlow Multi-Way 17 16th January 2012 06:30 AM
6 amp circuit one power supply unit advantages/disadvantages troyo Solid State 4 27th July 2011 04:09 PM
Advantages and disadvantages in the location of the port - bottom speaker kappa_ii Multi-Way 8 3rd April 2011 10:58 PM
Chassis metal advantages/disadvantages? bereanbill Tubes / Valves 60 9th June 2009 04:29 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:48 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2