|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hello,
I am shortly before construction of my first ESL's. 4 pieces toroidal transformers 230V/3V, the high voltage cascades as kit, Mylar, Elvamide, tesa 4970 and ABS sheets 3mm (as spacer) are already available. The order for copper strip and series resistors is pending. But selection and source of suitable high-voltage resistors for the low-pass segmentation and choosing a wire with suitable insulation thickness for the wire stator gives me a headache... To determine the breakdown strength of the wire insulation, I took the following assumptions: - At the diaphragm/membrane is a max. Bias of +5 kV. - The max. amplifier output voltage is +-30V. - 2 per ESL toroidal transformers are parallel wired at input side and in series at output, bringing the total effective transmission ratio of 1:136 (efficiency of transformer is about 0.89): this results per stator in a maximum voltage of 68 x 30 V = 2.04 kV, but as the ESL is “acting” like a capacitor, the "DC equivalent" has to be calculated with U[peak] = U * square root (2), which results in about 2.9 kV as the maximum given voltage on a stator. - With maximum membrane deflection/move - when the (positively charged) membrane is nearest to the (negatively charged) stator - therefore the voltage difference is between +5 kV - (-2.9 kV) = 7.9 kV If my analysis was right up to this point, this would mean a wire isolation with electric strength of 8 kV would have to be considered. But this surprises me, as various DIY ESL stators are made of PU spray coated perforated sheet metal or PVC insulated jumper wire only. Now I got in a forum the following point of view: "If the charge is constant, and d is changed, then also C is changing, hence the voltage, too." "Take for instance on both sides a distance of 2 mm and the membrane itself is moving 1 mm in one direction, then to this side the capacity is doubled and thus halves the voltage. On the other side the distance is increased from 2 to 3 mm, the capacity hence dropped to about 2 / 3 and increased the voltage to 1.5 times." This derivation is likely based on the following formula for a capacitor connection: U = Q/C = E*d = (Q*d)/(ε0*εr*A) At constant charge and constant surface therefore the voltage U between the "capacitor plates" stator and membrane depends linearly on the distance d between the plates. That would mean now that for a d/s of 3.5 mm (distance between the membrane and the conductive material of the stator) and just before the membrane hits the insulating layer (at about 3 mm displacement), of the bias voltage 5 kV only 14.3% (= 0.71 kV) would remain. The electric strength of the stator insulation therefore could be designed for 2.9 kV + 0.71 kV = 3.61 kV only. Is this assumption and calculation correct? Or do I have to design with 8 kV max voltage difference? My electro-technical understanding is unfortunately not very well, so I hope to get some comments of the specialists here Thanks in advance... |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Ur thinking too hard...
Afaik the bottom line relates to the conductivity of the diaphragm. If it is sufficiently high then you don't need much if any insulation on the stators... of course sharp edges or points are a no-no... You can read back in one of the threads on the Acoustat, Andy Szabo specs the insulation of the Acoustat stator wire... Moray James or Calvin can likely give you a precise answer depending on your construction method. I'm hardly the expert on this matter... _-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. -- |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
|
Quote:
You did not mention if you plan on building a full range ESL, or a hybrid. But based on your choice of transformers and amplifier output voltage, it will need to be a hybrid. With 30Vrms applied to the 3V windings of the transformers, the core will begin to saturate at frequencies much below 400Hz. If you are designing a hybrid with a proper crossover to filter out the lows, the diaphragm deflection will be very small. Assuming turn ration of 68 as you did, peak stator voltage of 68 x 30v x 1.414 = ~2.9kV and would result in a peak voltage between diaphragm and stator of 7.9kV as you calculated. This is well below the voltage gradient(7.9kV/3mm) at which air begins to conduct. Note that the PVC insulation does not see this full voltage. Why? because this voltage is applied to a voltage divider made up the PVC and the air. Since PVC is much more conductive than air and much thinner than the air gap, generally only 10% or so of this voltage is actually seen across the PVC insulation. The rest is dropped across the gap, where we want it. Most PVC insulation has a dielectric strength of about 500V/mil = 20kV/mm. So pretty much any wire rated for 600V - 1000V working voltage with insulation thickness of 0.4mm or greater will be more than adequate. If you are designing a full range things get much more complicated. It is true that constant charge operation causes the diaphragm voltage to drop as it approaches the stator. However, near the diaphragm resonance the diaphragm does not move in step with the driving voltage, changing phase relationship relative to the applied stator voltage above and below resonance. This phase relationship is also modified by how much(if any) resistive damping you use. What this means is that the worst case voltage between diaphragm and stator at low frequencies where diaphragm motion is considerable, can be several times higher than you might expect based on the constant charge calculations. But, even if this results in breakdown in the airgap the high diaphragm resistance and PVC insulation resistance turns what could be a rather dramatic lightning bolt into a small purple corona glow. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Maine, USA
|
Another tactful, helpful, and educational post by Herr Dr. Bolserst. Those are the sort of posts that keep me coming back to diyAudio even when the ego flare-ups tend to push me in the opposite direction.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Many thanks to bear and especially bolserst. So I do it as the many others do it too... with wire thickness of 0.5 mm and insulation thickness of 0.4 mm. And if I understood bolserst the right way, I should aim for a hybrid. O.k, I can use a Behringer DCX as crossover. Originally I intended to have a stator to diaphragm distance of 3 mm (ESL area 22cm x 120cm, frequencies segmented) . Should I really go for that?
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jackson,michigan
|
For panel that size you should be able to get by with a D/S of 2mm in a hybrid configuration.
that would allow you a better efficiency and still give you enough room for large excursions in the 200hz to 300hz range. jer |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
|
I would agree with geraldfryjr, with that size panel and an electronic crossover 2mm spacing will be plenty for a hybrid design.
The onset of saturation with your (230V/3V) toroidals will dictate how low you will be able to crossover. With 30Vrms input from your amplifier, I would recommend trying 300Hz-400Hz. Last edited by bolserst; 17th May 2011 at 03:31 PM. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Unfortunaltely I can´t do the panel size much bigger for a full range... problem is the woman´s acceptance factor in our living room. So finally I´ll have to invest some more money in bass drivers.
By the way, I forgot to ask about suitable resistors for the low-pass segmentation of the stators. Must it be high-voltage type? |
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Utrecht
|
Quote:
using high quality resistors in the final design may improve sound
__________________
drs M.J. Dijkstra |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| how can test the stator insulation and mylar coating? | lutherblisset | Planars & Exotics | 54 | 20th January 2012 12:05 AM |
| Role of ESL stator insulation? | Few | Planars & Exotics | 22 | 8th November 2009 12:30 AM |
| Electric field and stator hole alignment | arend-jan | Planars & Exotics | 22 | 23rd July 2009 07:17 PM |
| Testing Stator Insulation | bshaw147 | Planars & Exotics | 7 | 28th August 2008 09:05 AM |
| DIY Electrostatic Stator insulation | schpeltor | Planars & Exotics | 7 | 13th February 2002 07:11 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.15736 seconds (91.90% PHP - 8.10% MySQL) with 11 queries |