
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  The diyAudio Store  Gallery  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
25th April 2011, 06:44 PM  #1 
diyAudio Member

ESL electronics 101 for the electronics challenged
This is a spinoff from the "DIY esl for dummies" thread.
I realized there are a lot of basic theory that eludes me and I'm hoping some of you smart and capable people can help me filling in the blanks. It would be great if this thread could turn into a tutorial in electronics basics for the DIY ESL n0ob. If there is already such a thing please point the way because I need to do some reading. The electrostatic loudspeaker or esl as they are often called is basically a huge plate capacitor. The metaphorical driving force is the electric field generated between the two stators. To increase the field strength you can either increase the voltage or decrease the D/S distance. Since the ESL is a parallelplate capacitor of sorts, decreasing the D/S will increase the capacitance. The other way of increasing the capacitance is to increase the stator area. When dealing with AC such as a music signal the usually friendly and easily accessible electronics turn complicated really fast. Instead of the easy to comprehend resistance R we have to deal with impedance Z. The panels are almost purely reactive which lead to Z=Rj/WC [ohm], W (omega) being the angular velocity [radians/s]. W=2Pi*f, f being the frequency [Hz]. What this means is just that the impedance will drop as the frequency goes up and j/WC is the imaginary/complex component of Z. This is the point where I'm starting to get confused. Purely resistive loads are ideal for your average amplifier while a purely reactive load is about as far from ideal as you come. At this point there are two roads to chose from. 1) The common solution of using a step up transformer and a regular amplifier. 2) Get yourself a monster of a Direct drive amplifier. This is clearly not for the faint of heart. It's a big project and you're quite possibly going to be handling lethal currents. Going with option #1 you attach a transformer. This sounds easy enough but the already hairy Z suddenly gets an additional component, the inductive part jWL. At this point Z=R+jX where X=WL1/WC. To understand the inner mechanics of a esl I'd like to start with option #2, using a DD amp. Not really building one but learning how everything fits together and how it works. Some amplifiers are prone to oscillating when confronted with difficult loads while others are fine. How does the preferred load look? (Speaking of ESL's) A large capacitance will result in a low impedance and a relatively small phase angle. A small capacitance will be the exact opposite, high impedance and a relatively large phase angle. A large C will have a high demand for current but be an easier load? A small C will need less current but it'll be more difficult on the amp? Personally I always thought this to be a nobrainer, the small C was obvious to me. After reading a few posts in another thread it suddenly didn't seem as clear any more. How do you estimate how much current you'll need? How do you know if the amplifier is in danger of oscillating? How does an amplifier look that is immune to oscillating while working with audio frequencies? How can I make the panel an easier load? When will the frequency response suffer? What are the demands on the amp that I need to meet? As long as I looked upon Z as a resistive part everything was dandy. Now it's all confusing? Can someone please explain to me how to handle the complex load? I used to approximate the current demand using f= 20kHz. In a practical application you could probably get away with designing for half that current since there really isn't all that much information in music at 20kHz. Was my thinking correct? This is probably enough questions to fill a book on it's own but figured I'd give it a shot anyway. This is a free for all, if you have any questions about the electronics involved with ESL's go ahead and ask them. Hopefully we can find answers to at least a few of our questions. 
25th April 2011, 07:57 PM  #2 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jackson,michigan

Not to complicate matters but it has also been discussed that, It is a posibility that the strain on the amplifier can be reduced from using a larger panel becuase of the added gain of having a larger surface area.
Which by the way is why I built a panel with 4 times the surface area of my little panel, that is too explore this. Only I haven't got as far in testing this becuase #1, I haven't rebuilt new frames for the bigger panels yet, as the old one got broke, and #2 I don't have suitable measurement microphone or SPL meter at the moment. And, I would have done so when I built them in 2003 but I didn't have the proper electronics to drive them until a year ago. Increasing the surface area does increase the capacitance but because of the added gain of the larger area this allows you to use a lesser transformation ratio which inturn reduces the load on the amplifier for the same SPL level. This is where compromization comes into play unless you are trying to go out with all balls to the walls type perfromance like I have been trying to do to get every last drop of efficiency out of them. Apparently (and it has been said) that the laws of physic's due to the inoization of air will only allow you so much. This is why the Wright speakers are in a sealed bag of sulfer hexaflorine in order to run higher voltages in order to increase the efficiency. I have pushed my panels to this level of ionization of the air with the common purple glow as an indicator and could not get any more sound preasure out of them. So all that extra voltage was a waste and didn't do to much for loudness except stress the materials to their limits aswell. The good thing was that the resistance of the stator coating and the diagphram coating was high enough so that the currents in the arcs were low enough not to burn holes in the mylar diagphram. I found this to be true when I found holes burned in the diagphram of the panels that were coated with the white spray paint when subjected to the same conditions. jer 
25th April 2011, 10:48 PM  #4 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jackson,michigan

I had the same questions as you do as well as many others.
And it has takin alot of arm twisting and teeth pulling, Aswell as my on experimentations to find such answers. Even through all the the thread digging I could only find bits and pieces to the answers here and there and many without solid definition, It is good to have them all in one spot. As you can see how I keep having to back track to find the shortcuts to the best threads and they get buried very easily and quickly. It would be nice if they would split this part of the forum into there own enities of the different technologies like they did with the amplifier section. As I tried to state in a funny way but with all seriousness is that, my goal is to "take the mystery out" of such devices in order to get more diy'ers intrested in the technology. As it is truley amazing the kind of sound you get with a fairly simple (said lightly) form of construction. jer 
26th April 2011, 04:09 AM  #5  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Quote:
Remember no matter if you are dealing with a large capacitance(low impedance) or small capacitance(high impedance), the phase angle will be the same, close to 90 degrees. The only way to make the phase angle smaller is to add resistance to the load, or reactance of the opposite sign(ie inductance). The resulting phase angle will be dependent on the relative magnitudes of the resistance, inductance, and capacitance. Vector math is involved, but nothing too difficult. I can post a few mathematical & graphical examples if it would help. But, a few wiki searches may help just as well. A simple example of how to reduce the phase angle is to add a high power shunt resistance of low enough value that will swamp the capacitive reactance. 

26th April 2011, 08:27 AM  #6 
diyAudio Member

Thanks but this time it's just me expressing myself poorly.
I was thinking of "phi" and Z when I wrote that. Then again, I made a mess of it and it's always good to have a proper explanation. If you have the time, everyone will gain from it. My problem is rather understanding how the reactive part of the load is affecting the amplifier? 
26th April 2011, 02:21 PM  #7 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Approximating the ESL with a capacitor is a wrong approach. Perhaps better approximation would be a capacitor with a huge DF, since it radiates acoustic energy.

27th April 2011, 03:51 AM  #8 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

The resistive part of the radiation impedance is modeled as a resistance in series with the ESL capacitance. But, it is rather small in value.

27th April 2011, 04:23 AM  #9 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Attached is a *.zip file containing an Excel 2004 compatible and Excel 2007+ compatible impedance visualization spreadsheet for helping understand 4 simple circuit combinations.
1) R and C in series: See pic#1 The spread sheet lets you enter values for R and C and plots the impedance magnitude and phase. There is also a slider bar at the bottom of the main plot that lets you move the green marker to select a particular frequency of interest. The values for resistance, reactance, impedance magnitude and phase are displayed in the colored table above the plot. Also, the vector diagram is plotted off to the right, showing resistance in blue along the Xaxis, reactance in red along the Yaxis, and the resulting impedance in green. The phase is the angle between the blue and green lines. It is quite interesting to scroll the marker along and watch the vector diagram change with frequency. Note that for R and C in series, R dominates and sets the minimum impedance at high frequency; the phase approaches zero. At lower frequencies the reactance of C dominates and the phase angle approaches 90 degrees. See pic#2 for the vector diagram at a lower frequency(set by moving the marker) 2) R and C in parallel: See pic#3 With this type of circuit, impedance at lower frequency is dominated by R which sets a maximum value for the impedance; phase approaches zero. At high frequencies, C dominates and the impedance approaches zero; phase approaches 90. Combinations of resistance in series and parallel with a capacitor can be used to make the impedance more resistive(low phase angle) over the whole audio range. 3) R, L, and C in series: See pic#4 This is a series resonant circuit. L and C determine the frequency of resonance. R determines the minimum value of impedance at resonance and the sharpness of the resonance. Impedance is capacitive below resonance(phase ~ 90deg), and inductive above resonance(phase ~ +90 deg). 4) R, L, and C in parallel: See pic#5 This is a parallel resonant circuit. L and C determine the frequency of resonance. R determines the maximum value of impedance at resonance and the sharpness of the resonance. Impedance is inductive below resonance(phase ~ +90deg), and capacitive above resonance(phase ~ 90 deg). If people find this type of spreadsheet of interest, I also have one for a complete model of a transformer driven ESL taking into account transformer parasitics. I almost forgot to mention that the spreadsheet does use complex variable functions, so you will need to load the Analysis Toolpak Addin before it will work properly. Last edited by bolserst; 27th April 2011 at 04:38 AM. 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
esl electronics kit?  taichiguy  Planars & Exotics  6  26th March 2006 09:27 PM 
I know [almost] nothing about electronics  MetalDemonics30  Parts  2  6th May 2004 11:29 AM 
Applied Audio Electronics 101201  rick57  Solid State  5  16th May 2003 06:01 AM 
B.K. Electronics  ogp  Solid State  2  19th November 2001 09:00 PM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 