|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Sorry, no. I did do some service work on the Servocharge Amps, but never used them in my own system. Never cared much for their reliability or danger-value, so I always preferred transformers. Admittedly many of the reliability problems were addressed by later mods at the factory, and those done by Mike Savuto of Analogue Associates.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
|
Quote:
Your mention of the 'C-mod' brings up another topic I have been wondering about. If you compare the Acoustat 'C-mod' interface schematic to the Soundlab Model A-1 interface schematic, they are nearly identical. Do you happen to know if Strickland or Hafler was involved in developing the Soundlab transformer crossover network? It seems their network should have been covered under Strickland's patent US4323736. The 'C-mod' (and Soundlab) crossover networks do add a shunt resistive load across the primary of the HF transformer to reduce tendency for core saturation, but other than that, the basic circuit is the same. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I know that Jim maintained communication with other manufacturers of ESL's, most notably (Harold?) Beveridge, and he was never reluctant in sharing his expertise, but I am not aware of any actual design work that was done for other companies. Any similarity in circuit designs was coincidental, unless there was some 'copying' done, but I'm not making any accusations. Since Acoustat was somewhat the pioneer in making affordable, reliable ESL's (and in my humble opinion, never surpassed in those respects), designs that followed were bound to take advantage of lessons learned at Acoustat. As Jim was fond of saying "You can always tell the pioneers - they're the ones with the arrows in their back".
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Afaik, based upon actual tests - 20+ years ago now - and iirc, the HF xfmr has a different turns ratio in the C medallion version, the HF coupling caps were also changed. I wrote it down, and it is probably in a folder marked Acoustat, if I'm lucky.
Afaik, and I could be wrong, the PVC wires seemed to be attached with polystyrene dope, not epoxy. But on this I am only going by appearances. There is/was an article in Speaker Builder years ago called "Amber" which was a DIY clone of the Acoustat panels in most regards. The wire was essentially similar to "test lead" wire, except it was copper, not tinned (certainly on the later ones) and the PVC insulation was not as fat as standard test lead wire. Where one would get such a thing today is a good question, since it's not a standard wire afaik. If it made 10kv test, I'd be very surprised, but certainly better than standard PVC wire... If you go with a very high ohm coating then it's unclear that the insulation is going to be much of an issue. In other threads on the Acoustat people have said that using a lighter diaphragm and lighter coating results in better HF performance and overall sound. At least that opinion was voiced, iirc. Now, here's a question - there was an outfit in Florida that was making replacement transformers, do you know if they or someone else is still around?? Welcome to diyaudio! _-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. -- |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
|
Quote:
Here is a link to his repair website showing a burnt up coil from a LF Acoustat transformer. gallery Here is a link to his main website: Home Page |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Andy, any info on how Acoustat tested regarding the angles of the panels, particularly the 4 wide speakers? Also, how important it is to mix 8" & 9" panels vs just going with 9 inchers in a Model 8 / 4+4 type? I'm planning to build such a speaker with all the extra panels I've got. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I know there WAS a company in Florida making replacement transformers for Acoustat - at a handsome price - but not sure if they are still around or offering that service. I believe they were a successor to the original Southeastern Transformer, who made all of Acoustat's transformers except towards the very end of Arizona production. I cannot confirm nor deny your suggestion that the turns ratio was changed for the Medallion HF tranny. However, there was NO difference in transformer from B Meallion to C Medallion - only the passive network changed. The wire that Acoustat used was most certainly rated for 10-kV, and was 100% tested by the manufacturer for pinholes and other sources of leakage. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Andy, I just said that I was surprised that the wire would handle 10kv...
_-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. -- |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (1 members and 1 guests) | |
| Daudio1 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| No answer | Antoni D | The Lounge | 2 | 13th February 2011 06:19 AM |
| need a tech to answer this one | pks71 | Car Audio | 1 | 19th November 2004 11:50 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09044 seconds (73.07% PHP - 26.93% MySQL) with 11 queries |