|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
|
I recently got a new amp (class D , Nuforce ia7 v2 ) sounds great with my old acoustat spectra 1100 speakers.
I have one question, to do with replacing the 20 year old filter. I have found Siemens epcos MKV 100 uF capacitators, (from ebay germany) and have been told this is so much better than the tiny paper based cap in the speakers. I am about to replace them but there seems to be a bypass next to the offending article (see picture) Would it be safe to remove the bypass?, as the new cap must not be bypassed. http://i1044.photobucket.com/albums/...artels/ac2.jpg |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Burgundy, france
|
Hi Barmy
If i'm right the 100µF capacitor is connected in paralled with the 10µF one (the yellow one). Then both are part of the High pass-filter. you can change the chemical 100µF against another type (polypropylen...) without any risk. You might have sound advantage in the bass-middle frequency area. Mathieu |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Definitely change the electrolytic to polypropylene if you can. Mylar (polyester) is second best.
However, if you are not listening for "sound stage" (the stereo presentation) you will not hear much of a difference, as it does not appear so much as frequency response as it does spatial placement in the very upper mids, lower highs... There is no reason not to have a bypass cap, unless the bypass cap is lower in quality than the main cap. One of the purposes of using a smaller value bypass cap is that it will improve the way the larger cap works at higher frequencies. For example, if you use some paralleled polypropylene caps to get to the 100ufd value, there could be value in bypassing them with a 1ufd to 10ufd value polypropylene or maybe even a "teflon" cap... otoh I have found the polypropylenes to be a quite substantial improvement to the point that a bypass is not of real value... _-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. -- |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| changing acoustat 3 | Williams Audio | Planars & Exotics | 2 | 2nd May 2010 04:18 PM |
| acoustat X interface. | elmir2m | Planars & Exotics | 1 | 9th December 2005 08:34 PM |
| acoustat diaphragm | Williams Audio | Planars & Exotics | 4 | 4th October 2005 06:54 AM |
| Acoustat ESLs - What Next? | G-Daddy | Planars & Exotics | 12 | 11th November 2004 02:52 AM |
| More Acoustat questions | The Peasant | Planars & Exotics | 12 | 12th July 2004 06:38 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08170 seconds (72.72% PHP - 27.28% MySQL) with 10 queries |