|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Berlin
|
Hi
i wonder if this filter is a 6dB filter or is it a higher order? Its confusing me a little bit ![]() the rectangles in serial are the resistors and the capcacitors in parallel are the segments Carsten |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Berlin
|
Can anyone tell me if ic can insert small parallel-caps for a seperate ESL-bass-crossover to simulate the original freuqency-response?
that would be ~800 pF I am not sure to do this, because i don't know if the small caps can really survive this ![]() would be nice if someone could give me the answer Carsten |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
|
Quote:
This type of filter is commonly known as a ladder network and is used with segmented line source ESLs. The filtering is 6dB for each section of the filter. In your circuit: - the HT segment would receive no filtering. - the MT segment would receive 6dB low pass filtering - the BASS segment would receive 12dB low pass filtering If you simulate your circuit for an ideal ESL with no mass and an ideal transformer with no losses you will get responses similar to what is shown in Attachment #1. When simulating with SPICE, SPL is proportional to: 20*LOG[(current in ESL segment capacitor) / sqrt(frequency)] In practice, the mass of the diaphragm and transformer losses roll off the high frequency response and you would get response more like that shown in Attachment #2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Berlin
|
thanks for your answer- interesting simulation
can i replace the capacity of the MT +HT panel by small caps in the passive bass-crossoveror is this not a good ides? |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
|
Quote:
If you want to use a passive crossover for a bass panel, it would be easier to to do it on the primary side of the step-up transformer since you would be able to use crossover parts values normally stocked for dynamic driver crossovers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Berlin
|
Hi Bolserst,
Finaly i got an cheap 12 dBactive xover for evaluating bass-filtering. Works fine. I have made to much thoughts because i did not really understand the passive crossover, i always thought that the parallel-capacity of the panels add a 6dB lowpass for each segement... Carsten |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Crossover Question | SState13 | Multi-Way | 3 | 14th May 2010 03:05 AM |
| do i REALLY need a crossover?? and an amp question. and an ohm question | legendaryfrog | Multi-Way | 4 | 29th October 2006 01:39 AM |
| Crossover Question | ppfred | Multi-Way | 3 | 10th May 2006 09:16 AM |
| Crossover Question | cantskienuf | Multi-Way | 4 | 13th October 2004 09:59 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09206 seconds (75.50% PHP - 24.50% MySQL) with 11 queries |