Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Planars & Exotics
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th November 2009, 06:23 PM   #11
oshifis is offline oshifis  Hungary
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Budapest, Hungary
I tried 1% natrium hidroxide (= sodium hydroxid?) with good results. It removes both the photoresist and the aluminium. The material I tried on was aluminized food wrapping foil that I intended to replicate the diaphragm of a pair of orthodynamic headhones. I stuck with the photocpying. I wanted to use the other good side diaphragm as the mask in order to duplicate the faulty side, but the photoresist (Positiv 20) was not evenly distributed on the aluminium surface. It collected in spots like the aluminium were greasy. Perhaps it needed some washing with benzine or whatever so that the photoresist attached better.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2009, 07:40 PM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
Steve Dunlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Here
Quote:
am planning to try something a bit novel with the mid-range planars --an isobaric planar design where I have to membranes on each side of a center spacer and a sealed space between. That will give me twice the current handling even as it improves the sensitivity by placing each membrane into the higher flux area near the magnets. I don't know of anyone that's tried this before.
Koss did this in their Model 1 electrostatic for the bass panels. They were triple instead of double like you plan.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2009, 08:15 PM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steerpike View Post
Some photoresists use sodium hydroxide as a developer.
This will remove the aluminium - and quite fast too. (I've done it to get clear film from coloured gift-wrap)
yes but be careful -- if you get it on your skin, it won't hurt right away, but it is burning nonetheless.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2009, 08:18 PM   #14
tinitus is offline tinitus  Europe
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Such p-p design with double diaphragms have no advantage
P-P magnet system on the other hand may be very effective, apart from all the drawbacks

Tho, p-p diaphragms with reversed phase converts the dipole into a bipole, which ought to result in more low end, if its big ebough
Or what else might happen in relation to the complete speaker design

But I dont see how two such soft diaphragms which are completely non pistonic will work in unity
At worst they may work against each other, with all sorts of issues following

But please, do build it
And afterwards you will think if only you had used the time, money and effort to perfect an ordinary proven good functioning principle
There is nothing left to invent about this

Last edited by tinitus; 12th November 2009 at 08:34 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2009, 08:31 PM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustava View Post
where I have to membranes on each side of a center spacer and a sealed space between. That will give me twice the current handling even as it improves the sensitivity by placing each membrane into the higher flux area near the magnets.
With ESL's, this can provide more membrane motion for a given set of voltages, which is good because those voltages are limited by various danged bits of reality. As has been pointed out, it was implemented by Henry Kloss briefly. It is currently being used by M-L in their CLX bass panel. You may note that this has never been done for any but bass panels. Anyone care to venture a guess as to why?

With MSL's, I think there should be a similar benefit at least in taking double advantage of the static B field, and as you point out, allowing higher total current density. But as with ESL's, you will find that this arrangement does not work for high and midrange frequencies. The fact that no one is doing this at all may mean something further. Have you done a patent search?

Oop, didn't think about the field interaction between the two membranes. Please don't flog me if it is destructive.

And of course, in any event, p-p is better than single ended, adn your state ment about getting into the stronge part of the field implies single-endedness.

Last edited by DavidJanszen; 12th November 2009 at 08:36 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2009, 03:18 PM   #16
jrubins is offline jrubins  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Jose, CA
This sounds quite interesting.
Please keep us apprised of your progress
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2009, 05:10 PM   #17
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
[IMG]Click the image to open in full size.[/IMG]
I have tried a planar with 2 membranes,It can`t be used for midrange but works for bass .Sensivity is not better than with one membrane.
[IMG]httClick the image to open in full size.p://[/IMG]

Last edited by båndsei; 1st December 2009 at 05:16 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2009, 05:24 PM   #18
tinitus is offline tinitus  Europe
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by båndsei View Post
I have tried a planar with 2 membranes,It can`t be used for midrange but works for bass .Sensivity is not better than with one membrane.
A push-pull planar woofer would ofcourse have P-P magnet design, and still a single diaphragm/membrane, and gets expencive
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can a mylar rip be repaired? jeffshort2000 Planars & Exotics 6 8th December 2007 01:30 PM
Use of pre-metalized mylar willyCJ Planars & Exotics 4 19th June 2007 08:11 AM
So I got some 6um mylar bigwill Planars & Exotics 7 15th April 2007 11:34 PM
From glass to mylar peterr Tubes / Valves 11 11th November 2003 01:19 PM
1/2 mil Mylar for ESLs phishead8 Planars & Exotics 12 17th December 2001 03:05 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:59 AM.

Page generated in 0.11225 seconds (82.01% PHP - 17.99% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio