|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Front Row Center
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brezno (Abyss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
Planar speakers are dipole sources, generating velocity waves. Boxed speakers are omnidirectional sources, generating pressure waves. I think theoretically it is possible to span a diphragm in front of a closed box, but since the effective mass of the diaphragm is very low, you would need a huge box so that it does not restrict low frequency cutoff. In any case, you will lose "openness", the greatest benefit of dipole speakers.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Front Row Center
|
Remember if enclosing you do not need the same size panel , you will be able to use a panel that is some 50 % smaller , Hence a smaller box than would be necessary if you had envision enclosing a large dipole...
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
so enclosing a ESL would have advantages.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06729 seconds (72.52% PHP - 27.48% MySQL) with 9 queries |