|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
|
Hi all,
been testing my 1st prober esl's. Made them with idea of a 2-way esl + hybrid woofer (still to come). My wife likes to listen too, that's why I decided to try 2-way and hopefully end up with larger hot spot. Problem is that in 2-way mode, bigger panel filtered with series resistor, the speakers doesn't sound as good as when driven both element's full range without any filtering. Lots of accuracy is lost noticeable especially in "stereo image". Still 2-way frequency response looks quite fine: ![]() Any input? Yes, I know it would have been good to ask first, but I like to learn from my own mistakes thank you. ![]() Few pictures of the project so far with comments can be found: here. Last edited by vmk; 21st August 2009 at 11:27 AM. Reason: spelling, I'm Finnish... |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Don't quite know the issues involved here but could you use a transformer or bi-amp to avoid the issue of the impedance of the ribbons not matching your bass driver?
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Hi Vmk,
I recently finished my ESL. I use 3 panels per speaker. My panels are 30 cm + 10 cm + 30 cm. I tried using resistors to filter out the higher frequencies for the 30 cm panels, but I also didn't like it. I'm running them all full range now. Wachara C. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
Although it has a rather smooth monotonic upwards tilt, there is obvious SPL deficiency up to 500Hz. 5 dB max difference not minding the troughs, else its 10-15dB. That translates to human ear in diminished midbass volume perception. Since the power range of an orchestra is at 200-800Hz, even if you don't care much about bass, there will be thin perception of any music and vocals. Since the ESLs never have sensitivity to spare so to tilt down the trend with a line level filter, better make an inverse one, tilting up from about 500Hz downwards 50Hz by 5dB. If your membrane travel margin will not allow you much undistorted SPL with that approach, then midbass capable, mains flanking biamplified columns can come to rescue. Or double subs with forward facing woofers with no breakups up to 1kHz and crossing at 400-500Hz. Normal subs good up to 100-150Hz will leave a void in to the much fundamental 200-500Hz area for your music never to sound fleshed out and with realistic size. Big room there, excellent ESLs, its worth the effort for a full spectrum big scale hybrid system. Another approach, more economic in xmax and gear, would be to tone up from 500Hz down to 150Hz the mains, cut them abruptly, and then introduce a single good sub crossing at 150Hz.
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Front Row Center
|
Quote:
*Is it you are running said tweeter panel full range ? *Do you have seperate power supply or are all panels feeding off the same ? Regards, |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
|
If you drive the panels in full range mode, the resulting sound field is much narrower, which in its turn results in fewer room reflections. This is good for fidelity, but less good for persons not sitting in this narrow sound field.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
|
Ok, thanks all. I'm going to make new version with only one ESL-element per channel. Will also use bigger air cap (now only 1.2mm), one of the speakers started to leak like crazy and died
...Before it went I managed to test them with dynamic basses, electronic xover at 330Hz 24db/oct. Integration of esl and dynamic bass was horrible! I want to go much lower with ESL, so I need bigger panel and more room for the Mylar to move? Size of the new ESL-panel will be 320*1200mm (stator cut off's and frames dictate that size). How low will that size of panel go if I use let's say 2mm air cap? Any successions on the air cap size?
__________________
"Trying is the first step towards failure" -Homer Simpson |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
Try open H frame dipole bass. Its the enclosure first ms smearing that makes it too obvious when crossing at 350 to 500Hz to a an open frame ESL. High Qts large professional woofers without early strong break up are needed for H frame, will integrate easier than typical subs. Now if you go for larger membrane area, I am not an expert at all in ESLs, somebody else might answer your questions, I am just thinking of more difficult to control resonant modes in several directions if a membrane is getting large.
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
Wachara C. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
|
Quote:
.I made dipole bass units once for my little Magneplanar's and they were nice match for them. Have to start to selling the idea for my wife ![]() cheers, Vesku
__________________
"Trying is the first step towards failure" -Homer Simpson |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |