|Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
||Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|14th June 2012, 04:22 PM||#41|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Applying bias to the diaphragm does result in a charge induced negative tension increment.
I posted some plots of this behavior several years ago when I didn't understand what was going on.
arend-jan was kind enough to point me to the Peter Baxandall chapter on ESLs which discusses it in detail.
Diaphragm Resonance change with HV bias
Taking a look at the negative stiffness term of the force equation....
You can see that it increases as square of Vbias, but decreases as cube of D/S spacing. So, for the same panel area and diaphragm tension, if you double the D/S spacing and double the Vbias value to obtain the same efficiency, the negative stiffness term will have less affect on Fs.
Plots comparing negative stiffness trends for different D/S spacing posted here (Attachment 3):
Current vs voltage drive ESL?
In your case you have small areas due to segmentating the diaphragm into smaller sections, and your D/S is fairly large(3-3.5mm I think you had said). So, you may see only very small changes in Fs with bias change until you start getting above 8kV or so.
Last edited by bolserst; 14th June 2012 at 04:25 PM.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Asymmetric drive to asymmetric loudspeaker||tolits||Multi-Way||5||11th January 2008 05:14 PM|
|Class D for electrostatic speakers||koldby||Class D||23||4th December 2007 04:10 PM|
|Electrostatic Speakers & Amp||ralph-bway||Multi-Way||28||6th July 2003 06:43 PM|
|electrostatic speakers||junglejuice||Planars & Exotics||3||22nd October 2001 09:32 PM|
|New To Site?||Need Help?|