|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Hi, I have this OB thing spinning in my head
We have long known the theoretical advantages of a pushpull arrangement...improved symmetric drive and lower distortion But honetsly, I havent been giving it much kredit Besides when doing it like this the added woofer doesnt give more displacement, so whats the big deal But now I am wondering whether there could actually be something to it Maybe there really could be highly valueable gain from the improved symmetric drive and lowered distortion Even small as it may be, it may still deliver some significant and important bass information, details that would normally have been masked and blurred Just to clarify, this woofer OB "baffle" is actually a closed box, and something of a paradox that may be a major problem fore the many OB fans, who actually choose OB because they dont like boxes Ofcourse woofer polarity is reversed, so both woofers move as one single dipole unit edit, often rather cheap woofers are used, and especially those kind of woofers may really improve from this arrangement, and being low cost woofers, the added cost shouldnt cause much concern Any thoughts about how this may work out in real life |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Heres another option with 3 woofers, a strange one
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The first design is sort of an open baffle - if you do wire the speakers out of phase then I would assume that OB rules of panel width (vs. extension) would apply... And if so, then whatever frequencies are in the passband of the box would not go from the back of the box to the front because it prevents them from doing so - the sound from the rear drivers will reach the ears from reflections and will not sum on the same phase as the front driver to cancel distortion, which is the reason for the whole thing.
Or maybe I'm getting it wrong... Seems to me you would probably gain more from push pull open baffle I would assume, maybe someone did it. For the second design, I don't see how a non idenctical number of drivers will make push-pull work - the thing has to be "mirror like" in respect to driver specs, and of coarse they change uppon doubling the drivers. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
My, I had forgot all about that crazy idea
Your absolutely right, it seem much better to just do it the ordinary way, and get the advantage of having both drivers on front I seems a high cost to "hide" one driver on back just to get dipole action Whats it supposed to do anyway I didnt see it before, and why I asked The disadvantages are almost obvious, so I will try focus on maybe possible advantages 1. Its pushpull, and without any ugly magnet sticking out And its LOADED pushpull 2. Its way better to have only one woofer fore smooth transistion to a mid or tweeter 3. Here comes the tricky part Will it have low end roll off like a closed box, or like a dipole, or both Would this mean that better "low" Qts woofers could be used But one driver moving in and other moving out, how will that affect calculation of "box"
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Push pull BPA | warriorcookie | Chip Amps | 6 | 4th October 2008 05:41 PM |
| 12V push pull PSU. Need help. | darw82 | Power Supplies | 4 | 3rd June 2007 02:42 AM |
| modify parallel push-pull EL84 to single push-pull | chungtat | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 3rd November 2005 11:25 PM |
| Push-pull amp with OP | piney | Solid State | 1 | 28th March 2005 02:34 AM |
| Double push-pull versus single push-pull | jraraujo | Tubes / Valves | 19 | 19th October 2002 12:23 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08341 seconds (76.47% PHP - 23.53% MySQL) with 11 queries |