
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  diyAudio Store  Blogs  Gallery  Wiki  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies 
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
17th February 2012, 01:12 AM  #1 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Maine, USA

Planar magnetic DC resistance vs. impedance?
Does anyone have a ballpark sense, or perhaps the pertinent formula, for predicting how different the operating impedance of a planar magnetic driver will be from the DC resistance of the driver? I assume it will depend on the acoustic impedance seen by the diaphragm but I'm hoping someone can provide either
Thanks. Few 
17th February 2012, 01:32 AM  #2 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bremerton, WA.

If you make the assumption that DC resistance is equal to impedance you'll be correct.
The drivers in Magnepan's measure as almost purely resistive loads throughout the audio band. The woofers start to turn inductive, but only at fairly high frequencies. Dave. 
17th February 2012, 02:18 AM  #3 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Maine, USA

Thanks Dave. I know drivers like those in Magneplanars tend to be nearly purely resistive, but is the impedance at say 500 Hz or 1000 Hz the same as the DC resistance? I would think that the energy radiated as sound would have to be reflected in an impedance measurement.
Few 
17th February 2012, 02:38 AM  #4 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bremerton, WA.

It's pretty flat throughout the band.
Just for info, here's an impedance plot (attached) of the woofer transducers from my MMG's. (Note the scale on the left.) Notice that the driver starts to become inductive above approximately 3khz. (The impedance becomes fairly high at higherthanaudio frequencies.) A simple Zobel of about 2uF/5.0 ohms will effectively level this impedance to very high frequencies. Also, for the sharpeyed, you can see the effects of the L/R tuning dot arrangement. Notice the yellow trace has four peaks created by the three dots on one panel, and the green trace has two peaks created by one dot on the other panel. You can see that, as designed, none of the peaks line up with each other. The tweeter (not shown) is basically ruler flat at 3.6 ohms across the whole audio range. Cheers, Dave. Last edited by Davey; 17th February 2012 at 02:43 AM. 
17th February 2012, 03:24 AM  #5  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Indiana

Quote:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/plana...ml#post2851562 Quoting from the link (from there) to my calculations:  Resistance of an aluminum conductor is R = pL/A, where R is in Ohms, p is 2.6 x 10^(8), i.e. .000000026 Ohmmeters, L is length in meters, and A is crosssectional area in square meters. From that, the Ohms per meter would be .026 / (area in sq mm). So, with aluminum foil length in meters but foil thickness and width both in mm: (1) width = (.026 x length) / (Ohms x thickness) and (2) thickness = (.026 x length) / (Ohms x width) So, with those equations, we could calculate the needed width or thickness of the foil, if we specified the thickness or width and knew the length and resistance that we were replacing. (Also, remember that the length is in meters but the thickness and width are both in mm.) Also: (3) Ohms = (.026 x length) / (thickness x width) (4) length = Ohms x (thickness x width) / .026  I measured my Magnepan MG12/QR mid/bass panel's resistance with an LCR meter and it was 3.9 Ohms, at 100 Hz, 1000 Hz, and 10 kHz (my meter's limit). They are made with about 38 meters of 23 AWG aluminum wire, which has a crosssectional area of about 0.2588 square mm. (Note, also, that to replace the MG12's mid/bass wires with foil, which was what was being discussed at that link, one solution that used relatively narrow foil would require dividing the panel into two separate runs of foil of 8 Ohms each which would then be connected in parallel to get back to the original 4 Ohms. That would have made the total mass of the foil less than 20% of the mass of the original wires, in the case that was discussed.) 

17th February 2012, 03:16 PM  #6 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Maine, USA

Thanks all. Gootee, can you tell me whether the DC resistance of the panel you measured is 3.9 ohmthe same value you measured at audio frequencies? That's what I'm trying to get at.
I have no problem calculating the DC resistance of a conductor but I want to know whether that's the load the amplifier will see when driving the speaker at audio frequencies. The resonance hump in the impedance plot of a conventional woofer in a sealed box demonstrates that the mechanical and acoustical loads experienced by the voicecoil are reflected in the measured impedance. I'm trying to determine whether there is any broadband shift in the impedance of a planar magnetic driver relative to the DC resistance that is calculated or measured. Davey's plot shows the effect of the resonances. I'm trying to find out if there's any effect away from the resonances (such as the DC resistance being 3 ohms while the impedance between 200 Hz and 2 kHz is 4 ohms). 
17th February 2012, 05:05 PM  #7 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bremerton, WA.

Few,
The impedance seen at low frequencies continues down to DC. Even though my impedance plot only goes down to 20Hz, it's still a straight line at 4.8 ohms all the way to DC. Maybe you could outline why this is of interest for you. What's your ultimate question? Cheers, Dave. Last edited by Davey; 17th February 2012 at 05:11 PM. 
17th February 2012, 06:45 PM  #8 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Maine, USA

Thanks Dave. The reason I'm asking the question is that I'm designing the conductor pattern for a planar magnetic driver. I want the load the amplifier sees to be low enough to make good use of the amp's current capability but not so low that the amp gets unhappylet's say 4 ohms, for example.
It occurred to me that the DC resistance I calculate based on the resistivity of aluminum and the conductor dimensions might not be the impedance the amp sees. The woofer example I gave in a previous post was intended to point out that more goes into a speaker's impedance than DC resistance and inductance. The radiation impedance the cone experiences plays a roll also. For a planar magnetic driver it seems (based on evidence such as you provided) that knowing the DC resistance really is enough to predict the load the amplifier sees. Armed with that knowledge I can choose an appropriate conductor resistance target. I can design for a DC resistance of 4 ohms rather than aiming for 3 ohms to end up at 4 ohms. I get the feeling this question is not making sense to anyone so perhaps that indicates it's just not a smart question. 
18th February 2012, 01:09 AM  #9 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Indiana

It's a very good question. But the answer, as you are correctly deducing, is to shoot for the DC resistance to be what you want your amplifier to see. Planar magnetic speakers are almost a purelyresistive load, at audio frequencies. And the resistance is the same at DC.

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Planar magnetic with central tweeter?  Few  Planars & Exotics  103  22nd March 2016 02:17 PM 
help designing a magnetic planar woofer  baffleman  Planars & Exotics  14  18th April 2014 05:01 PM 
DIY Planar magnetic Hybride  WrineX  Planars & Exotics  71  9th August 2012 02:48 PM 
Planar Magnetic Drivers  8"  rubicon  Swap Meet  8  1st December 2010 08:22 PM 
ESL vs Planar Magnetic  Borat  Planars & Exotics  40  8th September 2009 03:47 PM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 