
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  diyAudio Store  Blogs  Gallery  Wiki  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies 
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
5th May 2010, 08:02 PM  #121  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Quote:
If you double the number of panels, and reduce the stepup ratio by sqrt(2)=0.7071 Then: You gain 6dB from doubling the panel area: 20*LOG(2) = +6dB You lose 3dB from reducing the stepup ratio by sqrt(2): 20*log(0.7071) = 3dB So, with both changes, you gain +3dB in efficiency. Be aware though, that doubling the number of panels doubles the panel capacitance in series with the leakage inductance which defines the upper bandwidth limit. If you want to keep the same high frequency extension, you will need to reduce the leakage inductance of your transformer along with reducing the stepup ratio. No free lunch... Last edited by bolserst; 5th May 2010 at 08:24 PM. 

5th May 2010, 10:22 PM  #122 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jackson,michigan

Thanks,Steve,for verifying that.
That is what I thought also. So in order to reduce my transformation ratio from 1:200 to 1:100 I would have to double my area to have the same efficiency. And if I quadruple the area I would net an extra +6db gain in efficiency. And if I kept the same transformation ratio of 1:200 I would gain +12db in efficiency. If this is True, It seems to go along with my recent findings. The rest of the stuff I understand. This helps me more in my understanding of the design criteria. As I had mentioned before, the reason I had built the two different sizes in that one of them is aproximately 4 times (actualy 5.26 times) the area as the other ,was too investigate this princpal. My other question now is, does raising the capacitance of the panel by using an insulating material with a higher dielectric constant (k) raise the efficiency as well? jer 
5th May 2010, 11:34 PM  #123 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010

This is a SPICE model I created of a transformer and ESL load. The items in the box represent the transformer with leakage inductance, stray capacitance, and wire resistance. To the left is the source and damping resistor. To the right is a 1000pf ESL.
The next screenshot is the voltage across the load without the damping resistor. Note the high Q resonance at about 31.6khz. This screenshot shows the impedance without damping. It is about 1.12 ohms at 20khz and about .175 ohms at 31.6khz We can calculate the unloaded Q at about 6.73 We will design for a Q of about .707. In order to accomplish this we will add a resistor in series with the primary to make the total Q .707. Here are the calculations... Fo=31600 hz Xc = 1/(2*pi*31600*C) C=1700/10^12 Xc=2962 Rsec=190 ohms Rpr=.1 ohms Q=2962/(.1*50^2+190)=6.73 Desired Q= .707 Rtot=2962/.707=4189 ohms Rds=4189(.1*50^2)190=3749 Rdp=3749/50^2=1.4996 ohms Therefore we need a resistor in the primary of about 1.5 ohms. Here is the result of that addition: The impedance plot follows: Note that at 20khz the impedance is about 2 ohms. The absolute minimum impedance is 1.67 ohms at about 31.6khz. The frequency response shows about .655 db down at 20khz I did this quickly, so I do not take any responsibility for my errors Later, Jim 
6th May 2010, 12:24 AM  #124 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jackson,michigan

Very cool!
I have not worked with spice yet, but I have been working with circuitmaker 2000 which uses spice. I'm wondering if it could be implemented in that program as well? I think it can, but there are some control functions that I have a hard time using or havn't figured out how to use. Even though it was a great program in the day, it has and still does serve it's purpose well, except for the poor support and no support of today. You can't beat the fact that you can draw the schematic ,simulate,make changes and simulate until the circuitworks ,dump the netlist to traxmaker manauly or automaticily route and print the board trace to a laser printer,iron,etch,drill, populate,solder and your done with nothing left but the smoke(ha ha ha).It's great! Anway I'll give it a try and see if it works. jer 
6th May 2010, 04:47 AM  #125 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008

Thanks for the cool info. I'm going to have to go back a few posts with paper and pencil to really get my head around this.
What a way cool program. Paul 
6th May 2010, 11:02 AM  #126 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Southern Germany

Jelanier,
cool ! I have some remarks on the values: 1. Primary inductance of 288mH appears too high. This would request a very big core and a lot of windings. I think about 100mH is the limit 2. Your leakage indutance L5 and L6 is too low. Its ratio is 0,000042 (L5/L2). Even you make a lot of intersection windings you will hardly target 0,0005, which corresponds to 90mH leakage. Would be intersting to see, how those values will modify performance Capaciti 
6th May 2010, 11:13 AM  #127 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010

Those figures are accurate and represent the actual values of a commercially available product. The secondary inductance is 720H with leakage inductance of 15mh. 720/50^2=.288H for the primary
Jim 
6th May 2010, 02:03 PM  #128 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Southern Germany

Jelanier,
Wow, if thats true, this needs to be an outperforming stepup. Would be interesting to know, how this stepup is designed in order to reduce leakage down to 0,000042, means 0,042 promille !! Capaciti 
6th May 2010, 02:25 PM  #129  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Quote:
Jelanier, if you are reflecting the ~720H secondary inductance to the primary side, L1=288mH, what do L2 & L3 represent in your model? Last edited by bolserst; 6th May 2010 at 02:37 PM. 

6th May 2010, 03:01 PM  #130  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010

Quote:
L2 represents half the number of turns. Twice the number of turns would yield 4 times the inductance. The load is connected at 2X. Since L2 is half the number of turns it represents a step up ratio of 25:1. So .288H x 25^2=180H If you model this as a single ended design (a single winding of 720 with 15mh leakage) the result is the same. That is also is a hint as to how low leakage transformers are created. I dabble with winding audio transformers myself and I can tell you that it is as much an art as a science. It requires mathematical gymnastics to achieve your goals. I would recommend Terman's engineering handbook if you wish to gain more knowledge on winding transformers. Jim Last edited by jelanier; 6th May 2010 at 03:23 PM. 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Help me construct my home theater  Paswa  Chip Amps  17  17th February 2013 11:00 AM 
What amp can I construct with KU606 ?  kalmara  Solid State  23  20th May 2008 01:36 PM 
How to construct grills?  C Schelp  MultiWay  24  8th September 2002 04:39 AM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 