How to construct a cube louver (Acoustat)
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
bolserst
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Quote:
 Originally Posted by geraldfryjr "Each panel now sees 3.01db less drive, but the panel area is doubled." Does this mean that the efficiency gain is equal (0db gain) or 3db more?
Starting with one panel and a transformer step-up ratio of 100:1.
If you double the number of panels, and reduce the step-up ratio by sqrt(2)=0.7071

Then:
You gain 6dB from doubling the panel area: 20*LOG(2) = +6dB
You lose 3dB from reducing the step-up ratio by sqrt(2): 20*log(0.7071) = -3dB

So, with both changes, you gain +3dB in efficiency.

Be aware though, that doubling the number of panels doubles the panel capacitance in series with the leakage inductance which defines the upper bandwidth limit. If you want to keep the same high frequency extension, you will need to reduce the leakage inductance of your transformer along with reducing the step-up ratio. No free lunch...

Last edited by bolserst; 5th May 2010 at 08:24 PM.

 5th May 2010, 10:22 PM #122 geraldfryjr   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Jackson,michigan Thanks,Steve,for verifying that. That is what I thought also. So in order to reduce my transformation ratio from 1:200 to 1:100 I would have to double my area to have the same efficiency. And if I quadruple the area I would net an extra +6db gain in efficiency. And if I kept the same transformation ratio of 1:200 I would gain +12db in efficiency. If this is True, It seems to go along with my recent findings. The rest of the stuff I understand. This helps me more in my understanding of the design criteria. As I had mentioned before, the reason I had built the two different sizes in that one of them is aproximately 4 times (actualy 5.26 times) the area as the other ,was too investigate this princpal. My other question now is, does raising the capacitance of the panel by using an insulating material with a higher dielectric constant (k) raise the efficiency as well? jer
 6th May 2010, 12:24 AM #124 geraldfryjr   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Jackson,michigan Very cool! I have not worked with spice yet, but I have been working with circuitmaker 2000 which uses spice. I'm wondering if it could be implemented in that program as well? I think it can, but there are some control functions that I have a hard time using or havn't figured out how to use. Even though it was a great program in the day, it has and still does serve it's purpose well, except for the poor support and no support of today. You can't beat the fact that you can draw the schematic ,simulate,make changes and simulate until the circuitworks ,dump the netlist to traxmaker manauly or automaticily route and print the board trace to a laser printer,iron,etch,drill, populate,solder and your done with nothing left but the smoke(ha ha ha).It's great! Anway I'll give it a try and see if it works. jer
 6th May 2010, 04:47 AM #125 pforeman   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Aug 2008 Thanks for the cool info. I'm going to have to go back a few posts with paper and pencil to really get my head around this. What a way cool program. Paul
 6th May 2010, 11:02 AM #126 Capaciti   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Southern Germany Jelanier, cool ! I have some remarks on the values: 1. Primary inductance of 288mH appears too high. This would request a very big core and a lot of windings. I think about 100mH is the limit 2. Your leakage indutance L5 and L6 is too low. Its ratio is 0,000042 (L5/L2). Even you make a lot of intersection windings you will hardly target 0,0005, which corresponds to 90mH leakage. Would be intersting to see, how those values will modify performance Capaciti
 6th May 2010, 11:13 AM #127 jelanier   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Apr 2010 Those figures are accurate and represent the actual values of a commercially available product. The secondary inductance is 720H with leakage inductance of 15mh. 720/50^2=.288H for the primary Jim
 6th May 2010, 02:03 PM #128 Capaciti   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Southern Germany Jelanier, Wow, if thats true, this needs to be an outperforming stepup. Would be interesting to know, how this stepup is designed in order to reduce leakage down to 0,000042, means 0,042 promille !! Capaciti
bolserst
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Capaciti Jelanier, Wow, if thats true, this needs to be an outperforming stepup. Would be interesting to know, how this stepup is designed in order to reduce leakage down to 0,000042, means 0,042 promille !! Capaciti
I could be wrong, but the leakage inductance, winding capacitance, and primary & secondary winding resistances match the Plitron 50:1 toroidal step-up transformer.

Jelanier, if you are reflecting the ~720H secondary inductance to the primary side, L1=288mH, what do L2 & L3 represent in your model?
Attached Images
 plitron_4133.gif (151.0 KB, 93 views)

Last edited by bolserst; 6th May 2010 at 02:37 PM.

jelanier
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Apr 2010
Quote:
 Originally Posted by bolserst I could be wrong, but the leakage inductance, winding capacitance, and primary & secondary winding resistances match the Plitron 50:1 toroidal step-up transformer. Jelanier, if you are reflecting the ~720H secondary inductance to the primary side, L1=288mH, what do L2 & L3 represent in your model?
Inductance varies as to the square of turns. L2 and L3 share the same field.
L2 represents half the number of turns. Twice the number of turns would yield 4 times the inductance. The load is connected at 2X.
Since L2 is half the number of turns it represents a step up ratio of 25:1. So .288H x 25^2=180H

If you model this as a single ended design (a single winding of 720 with 15mh leakage) the result is the same.

That is also is a hint as to how low leakage transformers are created. I dabble with winding audio transformers myself and I can tell you that it is as much an art as a science. It requires mathematical gymnastics to achieve your goals. I would recommend Terman's engineering handbook if you wish to gain more knowledge on winding transformers.

Jim

Last edited by jelanier; 6th May 2010 at 03:23 PM.

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Aussie Amplifiers         CSS         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Paswa Chip Amps 17 17th February 2013 11:00 AM kalmara Solid State 23 20th May 2008 01:36 PM C Schelp Multi-Way 24 8th September 2002 04:39 AM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:21 AM.