In principle you could measure it by isolating it with a larger capacitor (or two), then either use a capacitance meter, or measure the AC voltage across it in series with a resistor. The problem is knowing that the measurement isn't influenced by the change in voltage across the larger caps, and not blowing up your meter or anything else in the process. The older capacitance bridges like the GR 716C could measure small values of capacitance (up to 1.1uF, I think) with a bias voltage of up to 700V or so. What's the voltage of your HT?
Hi Conrad,
The HT is 1500 Volts. I expect the capacitance to be in the order of 300 pF.
The difficulty is indeed preventing the measurement itself from upsetting the values too much, and keeping the instruments healthy at these voltages. I have a 100MOhm probe that I can use (with a 1:1000 voltage devider).
There is also the risk of the stepup transformer influencing the measurement (shunt winding capacitance is 200pF).
There must be some elegant way to measure this, right?
The HT is 1500 Volts. I expect the capacitance to be in the order of 300 pF.
The difficulty is indeed preventing the measurement itself from upsetting the values too much, and keeping the instruments healthy at these voltages. I have a 100MOhm probe that I can use (with a 1:1000 voltage devider).
There is also the risk of the stepup transformer influencing the measurement (shunt winding capacitance is 200pF).
There must be some elegant way to measure this, right?
That's a tough one. I have visions of making the measurement through a big oil type HV capacitor, but then you have a fairly deadly high energy capacitor to contend with. IMO, it'll be hard to see the signal with a X100 probe, much less X1000. I'm not up on electrostatic speakers- does the application of the HT offset the diaphragm? If not, you might be far safer to just assume the capacitance doesn't change much with voltage. Here's another intriguing thing. A pure reactance can't dissipate any power, so a speaker that's purely capacitive can't produce any sound. The power consumption has to show up as dissipation factor for the capacitor/speaker. IMO, that DF number would be something very interesting over the audio frequency range. If the efficiency is any good at all, the DF should be fairly high, and the capacitance measurement is thus only half the story. You could wire up a purpose designed bridge for the measurement, but that will require a bit more thought. Sorry I can't be of more help, but this measurement does seem like a tough one.
Hi,
You only charge up the membrane! If the polarization voltage is connected such that the ground potential is connected to the midpoint of the audio tranny, both stators will be on ground potential (with no audio signal applied). Since only the capacitance stator-stator is of interest (and easy measurable, because these are low ohmic, while the membrane itself is very high-ohmic) there should be no problems with high voltages.
Besides: I find the capacitance change of low interest. Isn´t it rather the value und change of the resonance frequency, that is more interesting?
jauu
Calvin
You only charge up the membrane! If the polarization voltage is connected such that the ground potential is connected to the midpoint of the audio tranny, both stators will be on ground potential (with no audio signal applied). Since only the capacitance stator-stator is of interest (and easy measurable, because these are low ohmic, while the membrane itself is very high-ohmic) there should be no problems with high voltages.
Besides: I find the capacitance change of low interest. Isn´t it rather the value und change of the resonance frequency, that is more interesting?
jauu
Calvin
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.