|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| PC Based Computer music servers, crossovers, and equalization |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#981 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pilsen
|
UnixMan,
Thanks for sharing your experience. I played with tapping I2S from a CD player and hooking to an external DAC. 30cm of quality shielded CAT5 (the second wires in the pair grounded) without any proper impedance match, no buffers. The clock signal at the end did not look good on my scope. And I could tell it from the sound. I love the shielded CAT5 cable (STP), inexpensive and very universal. E.g. my S-VIDEO cable is 12 meters long - crisp sharp picture. |
|
|
|
|
#982 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
|
Quote:
It's interesting that there are a few folks doing external I2S. I'm working on a project using my Delta 1010 card to feed the I2S externally. I'm 'planning' on trying to do a reclock arrangement based on Swensons squeezebox reclock, and have most of the parts except the clock (can't find a 22.57xx clock, and I was planning on doing 44/88 first). For isolation, I got some of these http://search.digikey.com/scripts/Dk...=390-1116-5-ND to try out. I'll be hooking this up to a TAS5518 evm module (since a pll is used in the 5518 internally, I suspect there's a limit as to how far improving jitter will help, but it's worth trying) I'm expecting that the reclock and the galvanic isolation should pretty much remove the PC from the equation, but this is still speculation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#983 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Quote:
Quote:
The best solution for jitter is to slave the transport to the DAC and to not use any kind of receiver nor ASRC there. That is what I'm pursuing. On the computer part, I'm using an Infrasonic Quartet (not modded yet), which is excellent and most important, has a wordclock input. I was going to ask in this thread if there are already linux drivers, IIRC they were working on them.
__________________
The response of the inner ear extends to at least 200khz - Dr W. Tempest |
||
|
|
|
|
#984 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pilsen
|
Infrasonic Quartet is a nice card indeed. Since the card's manufacturer SIMS Corp. is interested in full linux support, they helpfully provided me with a sample and some key information. I am working on the alsa driver, it will take a few days though
|
|
|
|
|
#985 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Quote:
I got it yesterday and I'm very pleased (running vista) If you have some more technical information or a mail of somebody over there, can you drop me an email? I wonder if the "I.S.D. link" has already i2s pins inside. That would mean that no mod on the card is needed to tap i2s (too good to be true but maybe...)
__________________
The response of the inner ear extends to at least 200khz - Dr W. Tempest |
|
|
|
|
|
#986 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
Just about any decent (full-duplex) card which have at least one S/PDIF input (including my Juli@, of course... ) can be synchronized to it. All you need to do is to embed your DAC local clock into a dummy s/pdif stream and sent that back to the sound card input. You lock the card to it and bingo!, your output stream is locked to the local clock on your DAC. Just open up the connection between the s/pdif receiver reconstructed clock and your DAC (connect it directly to the local clock) and you're done.In principle it's trivial...
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#987 | ||||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
http://sound-man.co.uk/interface.html It requires replacing the onboard crystals with a feed from the clock, but it appears to work fine. I'm just frustrated by the lack of 44/88 clock modules around. Any pointers to sources is welcome. I'm looking at 88 rather than 96 since a) easier upsampling for redbook b) still planning to mod the Oppo for 88k pcm output from sacd c) recording vinyl (if I ever get to it) shouldn't care, so 88k is fine. I'll go with 96 if I can't find a decent clock, but I'm holding out hope. For reference, Swenson's reclock scheme is here: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showth...ico#post191045 Since everything is I2S in my case, I don't need the added complexity of the LJ->I2S delay portion, so it basically boils down to a 74174 and a 7474. Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
#988 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
From UnixMan's post #986
Quote:
From alsamixer i choose IEC958 Input as the source for the 'Multi Track Internal Clock'. It works. Ciao Andrea |
|
|
|
|
|
#989 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Quote:
But since the Quartet costs the same as the Juli@ (in Italy) and I like simple things... Also, I dunno how simple is in the DAC to have a spdif out. I will get the wordclock out from the master clock. PS: I'm talking about a DAC without without spdif altogether
__________________
The response of the inner ear extends to at least 200khz - Dr W. Tempest |
|
|
|
|
|
#990 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
UnixMan:
Can you post the pinout of the connection on the Juli@ card (since you seem to have figured it out)? With the active assistance of Max (of MPD) we now have seemingly flawless bit perfect playback of HRx files from MPD. This is best verified with the BADA dac and its HDCD light verifying "bit-perfect" playback of 176.4 KHz files. The current MPD git works right and seems to be identical to playing directly from aplay sonically. As for the need for other features or mixing etc, for my purposes they are un-necessary. And the Juli@ card has separate crystal chains for 44.1 and 48 multiples making for lower jitter than most PLL's can achieve. Next step is creating external low phase noise clocks for the Juli@ card. Originating the clock at the DAC is the right way but there is a bootstrap problem- the source needs to tell the dac what sample rate for the dac to switch the clocks, however there is no mechanism to do that in current products. With good shielding the soundcard should be a good digital source especially if noise impact on the clocks and output connections are minimized. The spdif/aes-ebu output transformer is very important for this as is optimized impedance matching- reflections will cause a lot of data dependent jitter in the signal. My biggest concern is that there isn't much happening in new soundcard chipset options that support all 6 sample rates. I hope Via will continue the Envy24 series. The others don't look as good and the Lynx /RME stuff has a whole lot of baggage not needed for 2 channel playback.
__________________
Demian Martin Product Design Services |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.16570 seconds (80.73% PHP - 19.27% MySQL) with 11 queries |