A sort of jukebox programme - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > PC Based

PC Based Computer music servers, crossovers, and equalization

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th December 2012, 06:15 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
blue_luke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Default A sort of jukebox programme

Hi all,
I have the project in the following years to digitize my entire collection of vinyls, about a thousand or so.
To digitize I have the equipment and the know how to produce .wav files and corrections etc.
But I need a few pointers for playing them!
My scenario is to digitize the records using Steinberg wavelabs 6 to produce the files.wav and a high quality preamp and DA converter ( RME in this case and a hombrew RIAA preamp)
So that taken care of, what I will need is a way to build a database where I can retrieve easily an album or even a particular song.
What programme(s) would you suggest to archive and retrieve the songs in an orderly way.
I did a search but lot of stuff is for linux or dates back to 2005
My idea is to put everything on a USB HD and take it from there
Any suggestions? comments? idea?
It would be nice also to be able to scan the covers and include this in the files... mind you a scanner for a 12X12'' cover is something else!
Thanks, Luc
PS: I am talking more than 500hours of music, more than 10,000 titles!
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th December 2012, 06:40 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jackson,michigan
I have tried this software and I like it very much.
It is very easy to use and maybe it will suit your needs.
It is at least worth looking at as the standard version is free.
I used the Pro version and it works for 2 months for free.

ifoundasound |

jer
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th December 2012, 08:20 PM   #3
DUG is offline DUG  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: mississauga ontario canada
On a PC I use Windows Media Player.
Create your own playlists.

For a standalone I use an ipod 64G...I don't know how many you are going to get on there using .wav files. Mp3's take up a lot less space.

__________________
Doug We are all learning...we can all help
"You can't stop the signal, Mal. Everything goes somewhere..."
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th December 2012, 08:27 PM   #4
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Blog Entries: 6
I would probably convert them to .flac which is lossless and reduces file size by roughly 50%. Flac is well supported in the linux realm. (And windows as well)

I use J River Media Center to play all of my digital media.
__________________
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th December 2012, 08:28 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
blue_luke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
I Do not want to use MP3s, I definitely can hear sound degradation, and let's not start a debate about this! It is a choice I make for some other technical reasons, one of them being that all my music softwares are paid ( quite a bit) and use .wav format!
I will not distribute in anyways those files, all I want realy is to be able to listen to my old records in a more practical way!
So I will examine the suggestions given so far.
Thanks, Luc
Luc
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th December 2012, 08:33 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
blue_luke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinkr View Post
I would probably convert them to .flac which is lossless and reduces file size by roughly 50%.
I wonder how important it is to compress files now that terabyte Hard disk are quite common.
A rough guestimate for file size in stereo is 10Mbytes per minute.
Then 1 teraB = 1 million minutes = 16,666 hours!
So compressing data on a dedicated disk is irrelevant here!
Unless there is other advantages unbeknownst to me!
Luc
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th December 2012, 09:01 PM   #7
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Blog Entries: 6
Not sure, but the typical CD is around 600 - 700MB, a high resolution album in 24/192 may be 5GB or more uncompressed, so .flac actually makes sense in this context as it doubles the number of files you can store.

I have 1.5TB of storage on my media server and I have used roughly 30% of the available space at this time just for music, the rest was intended for video storage which ain't happening.. It gets used up faster than you might suspect. I have lost track of the number of recordings I have on the server, but I strongly doubt it is more than 200 or so albums. A growing library particularly if high res with fill that drive faster than you expect.

Also when you need to make back up copies since the individual files are smaller this proceeds a bit more quickly. (Not a big deal in most instances)
__________________
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2012, 05:04 AM   #8
phofman is online now phofman  Czech Republic
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pilsen
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinkr View Post
Also when you need to make back up copies ...

Actually the "when" should be avoided Spending countless hours ripping the collection and not backing-up the files is bad practice.

I agree, IMO flac is the proper archive format, considering its reduced size and additional features compared to wav. When taking into account the storage space must be doubled for backup purposes, every spared gigabyte matters.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2012, 01:48 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
blue_luke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
I've just checked about .FLAC files and it seems to be the ticket.
One advantage is that it is a native format in 'Reaper', which I can use in my pro work, we use Nuendo, but for this project I see no difficulties.

there is an excellent WIKI about it here: FLAC - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And a list of software that use it: List of hardware and software that supports FLAC - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quite interesting
Luc
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2012, 05:14 PM   #10
Floric is offline Floric  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bavaria
Hi,

one advantage of flac over (pure and widely supported) wav is the possibility to store metadata (artist, album, title etc.) within the file.

I would not want to store large amounts of songs without correct metadata.

Best regards

Flo
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help getting my jukebox project going Cambriel Construction Tips 3 7th February 2011 10:20 PM
Help With Jukebox Amp HYDEBEE Tubes / Valves 2 30th December 2005 11:03 AM
PC jukebox cougarz Digital Source 8 25th November 2005 03:07 AM
PIC software programme for solid state preamp Jan Dupont Digital Source 4 20th January 2004 08:06 PM
PIC programme software for Solid State Preamp Jan Dupont Solid State 3 10th January 2004 08:56 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:43 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2