|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| PC Based Computer music servers, crossovers, and equalization |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#111 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NJ
|
For the time being, I have two formats of 24/96 music files, flac and the wave files created by dBpoweramp music converter.
After much listening, the waves sound slightly but definitely better. I hate it but its true. I don't want to live w/o tagging and the rest of it. |
|
|
|
#112 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
|
Quote:
But measuring and obtaining a set of good filters is not trivial for sure. That's what I've never accomplished :-( Every time I get so-so results I decide it's just not worth it - I'm loosing some low level information and dynamics. |
|
|
|
|
#113 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Singapore
|
Quote:
I've upgraded the server, and expect brutefir will be able to provide full drc to three rooms ![]() . Tony Dickenson provided some great notes on the basic measurement steps. and for me the correction has most definitely increased detail and dynamics. There is at least 6dB loss of signal, which is unavoidable. In terms of perception the loss is probably 10dB, as room modes are cut back dramatically, so the volume needs to be set a lot higher. I have tried the filter setting generated by Ingus' "normal" correction file, and find that it takes away some of the life from the music, and use a "minimal" setting for brutefirdrc. I find this more to my taste. |
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
|
There is an update to soundcheck's blog.
soundcheck's - audio@vise: Squeezebox Touch -- Modifications Soundcheck is thinking about turning his mod into commercial product. Please write what you think about this idea. I find it unfair for two reasons: 1). It just kills future community works. Who will share his findings on Touch's configuration if he'll know Soundcheck will grab them into his commercial package. Soundcheck writes on his blog: "What keeps me back posting those modifications to the community is the fear that these might be misused or copied by others for different commercial purposes." Is it fair Soundcheck? You will be exactly the same threat to the community. Can you swear you'll never use in your product what you'll find here or somewhere else online? 2). With all regards - Soundcheck already didn't find out all the mods by himself. Look at the proof: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=72787&highlight=soundcheck By the way - I don't believe there is a market for such products. How many people will pay for that? 10? May be. |
|
|
|
#115 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi there.
Just to make one thing clear. I do not intend to go commercial with my modifications. I guess I pointed out why. The current list of modifications is a collection of system relevant parameter changes. You can look up the basic idea in the "Linux Audio The Way To Go Thread" over here. I am driving that idea for almost 4 years by now. 99% of those ideas are taken from that journey. I can assure you that I put quite some time and energy into all that. Definitely more then those guys charging 200$ for a PS. The link posted above has nothing to with the mods. I currently install/provide the mods for systems run by trustworthy persons offline and free of charge. As I stated - I am not yet sure how to continue with this story. Cheers
__________________
::: Squeezebox Touch Toolbox and more ::: by soundcheck Last edited by soundcheck; 20th December 2010 at 03:53 PM. |
|
|
|
#116 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Nice to have you back soundcheck.
I don't know how much you would have to worry about others using your work for commercial purpose. I think that people that are doing stuff like this are probably savvy enough to a quick net search to find out the truth. I have your mods installed, except the screen and buffer which I couldn't get a hold of, with a linear power supply. I was pleasantly surprised with the performance on my system. Good work. I eagerly await your other work. By the way, if you are ever coming out to western Canada I would be happy to give you a big scare on the mountain bike. |
|
|
|
#117 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
|
Ok. Sorry for misunderstanding.
I still think your decision to keep your mods in secret is wrong but it's your choice. I do not deny that you've put a lot effort into that mod - all credits to you - but I believe we could all profit from joint development/testing program. There are several of us who are interested in this thread - some know more about linux, some more about pearl programming and some can only help doing testing. That's the free world spirit which would push the results further and faster. Regards ps. To all reading this thread - I've tested Soundcheck's mods and they really work. I've done BLIND a/b tests and I can distinguish modded vs unmodded system 10/10. Is it enough for non-believers? If you cannot hear the difference either you're deaf or your system is simply not resolving enough. I've done blind tests to standard/linear power supply and to local/server flac decoding. I'm using SPDIF out all the time. After that i started trusting my ears more and i haven't done proper tests to wifi on/off and other minor upgrades but their cummulative influence is also positive. |
|
|
|
#118 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NJ
|
I hope that whatever is keeping Soundcheck/Klaus from updating his blog clears up soon. I am sure that the software mods that were on his blog contributed to the quality of what I'm now hearing.
|
|
|
|
#119 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
|
New to this site. I'm interested in Soundcheck's work and don't understand why some feel commercialization is wrong.
In fact, why not try to license the work to Logitech? Your work gets rewarded and the user gets the upgrades free. Hope you find a solution. |
|
|
|
#120 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pilsen
|
Quote:
Even that is explainable - lowering CPU activity = lower noise on supply lines with direct impact on SPDIF output jitter. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| question to Squeezebox Touch users | Martin Prothero | PC Based | 50 | 13th August 2010 10:27 PM |
| Which PS for Squeezebox Touch upgrade? Twisted Pear Placid, or AMB σ11? | orpheus | PC Based | 8 | 4th June 2010 09:52 AM |
| Squeezebox Receiver Modifications | jkeny | Digital Source | 3 | 12th March 2010 08:22 AM |
| Finish of the speaker, the final touch.. | thanx | Multi-Way | 3 | 20th November 2007 03:12 AM |
| Squeezebox 3 | I_Forgot | Digital Source | 0 | 3rd January 2006 03:16 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |