|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| PC Based Computer music servers, crossovers, and equalization |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#61 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
As long as they measure the same in complete measurements they will sound the same. If one is using an amp with 1% distortion such as PA and other amps meant for commercial use are going to sound bad. Receivers these days deceive with their specs, so to get the "rated power" you nearly have to use separates intended for home use. Most people never notice but they are being lied to with power specs.
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
|
I think receiver power ratings are not "lies" but are deceptive. If it says 100 W per channel you can get 100 W.... from one channel at a time.
Last edited by macboy; 1st November 2010 at 01:36 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
I found several programs that allow you to use a multi-channel sound "card" as a digital crossover. I really don't think the onboard realtek is that good so I bought miniDSPs which don't require any processing power after setting them up, unlike using a soundcard, from the computer and they use higher def circuitry than most sound cards. Active crossovers are incredibly complex to wire up, at least for me. I blew one expensive tweeter already by hooking the wrong cable to it. I don't know if there is any improvement in sound quality with digital active crossovers but am largely attracted to it because it is a complex problem for me to work on in my head and using measurements. The miniDSPs now interfaces and imports measurements from Room Eq Wizard, a freeware program which makes adjustments much easier. It all becomes expensive with more amps, more cables, measurement mic etc.
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
Purposeful deception=lying
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Free Digital Room Correction And PC based Xover | kipman725 | Multi-Way | 3 | 7th August 2009 12:13 PM |
| Progress report - digital crossover as a DAC - digital all the way to the amps | Ken L | Multi-Way | 0 | 26th November 2006 11:42 PM |
| DTS and Dolby Digital | ntornkvi | Digital Source | 11 | 14th September 2004 06:17 AM |
| Dolby Digital..... | bimbla | Digital Source | 3 | 31st March 2004 09:02 AM |
| PC Based Digital source with DEQ/DCX functionality? | ultrachrome | Digital Source | 12 | 27th October 2003 06:26 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09937 seconds (77.14% PHP - 22.86% MySQL) with 10 queries |