Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > PC Based
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

PC Based Computer music servers, crossovers, and equalization

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22nd November 2009, 12:47 PM   #251
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nazar_lv View Post
:-) in good system ad1896 can be sonically detected very easy (ASRC-bypass)
Yes, but then you are also comparing 200ps jitter with 15ps . Also , the oversampling won't be the same either. You should compare with 88.2 / or 96khz source format. So , oversampling differences are rendered insignificant.

15 loops means theres no noticable degradation caused by the ASRC chip, as some journalists predict that the jitter / amplitude tradeoff is inevitably wrong.

That trade-off is already swamped by the noise shaper in the sigma delta chip , I beleive.

Last edited by tritosine; 22nd November 2009 at 01:00 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2009, 04:13 PM   #252
Pano is offline Pano  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
Pano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by tritosine View Post
1. despite i2s, its only as good as the source.
2. i2s can't really be longer than half meter
1: Quite true, of course. But just how "bad" is it? Perfect it is not, but nothing is.
2: For normal I2S, OK. But I was wondering if the "TG-Link" is buffered or level shifted or impedance matched or something for longer lines. I remember reading that somewhere, but could be wrong. There isn't a lot of info on it.

Don't get me wrong, I think async is great, just wondering about other ways of getting the clock there. I've spent 25 years running computer graphic signals over long lines. Clock (sync) issues become very obvious there.
There are many ways to deal with that, some good, some bad.
__________________
Take the Speaker Voltage Test!
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2009, 04:36 PM   #253
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Well, this is old now, these USB thingies are here to stay. Now if you need 100meter and 50channels worth of 96/24 thats another story, its called IEEE 1394 ( FW) . If latency was no concern i'd prefer wireless.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2009, 11:17 PM   #254
Pano is offline Pano  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
Pano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Blog Entries: 4
Is latency a problem - in a home hi-fi system?
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2009, 11:38 PM   #255
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
If video is to be synced, possibly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd November 2009, 02:08 PM   #256
Pano is offline Pano  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
Pano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Blog Entries: 4
OK, cool. Wasn't thinking HT, just music.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009, 09:23 PM   #257
diyAudio Member
 
Nazar_lv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Banderstadt
Blog Entries: 8
Send a message via ICQ to Nazar_lv
Quote:
Yes, but then you are also comparing 200ps jitter with 15ps .
correctly do experiments I can, so if I say that this is so then it is so, jitter in both cases was the same as the rest.
Quote:
You should compare with 88.2 / or 96khz source format
not intresting, nowadays intresting is only 16/44.1, with 96/192 deterioration in the sound will be less but will still be large enough (bad DF`s :-()
__________________
"In developing audio devices we can always find creative non standart solutions that will ensure the best sound" (с) www.overture.org.ua
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2011, 12:28 AM   #258
exa065 is offline exa065  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
PC->DAC was the Missing Link for my DAC project for over a year. I couldn’t find it so I joined forces with a couple of friends to build it. My USB to I2S design is about to be released. It is an 8-channel Asynchronous USB to I2S interface. It works with ES9018. Please have a look: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/digit...interface.html

Any feedback is highly appreciated.

exa
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2011, 03:58 PM   #259
diyAudio Member
 
soundcheck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Duesseldorf
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by exa065 View Post

Any feedback is highly appreciated.

exa
There's a vendor section. The right place to do your marketing!
__________________
::: Squeezebox Touch Toolbox 3.0 and more ::: by soundcheck
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:22 AM.

Page generated in 0.09773 seconds (79.14% PHP - 20.86% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio