Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > PC Based
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

PC Based Computer music servers, crossovers, and equalization

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th May 2009, 09:23 PM   #201
ejaouen is offline ejaouen  France
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
To me ADAT is the perfect simple way to do it, with the inherent bonus of electrical isolation between pc and dac.
The only thing still needed is a small diy board around wavefront AL1402G chip near exactly as described in its datasheet. This is very simple but still too complicated for me being a newby in creating circuit boards and soldering ICs.
I hoped the twisted pear guys would be interested in this project...

I will probably end up making it on a stripboard with a "soic to dip adapter" but this going to be a long task, knowing how fast and experimented I am...
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd May 2009, 09:12 AM   #202
Telstar is offline Telstar  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Quote:
Originally posted by ejaouen
To me ADAT is the perfect simple way to do it
...
Isn't ADAT limited to 16/44.1k per channel?
__________________
The response of the inner ear extends to at least 200khz - Dr W. Tempest
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2009, 12:39 PM   #203
ejaouen is offline ejaouen  France
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
44100 or 48000hz is the limit yes (if you want the 8 channel possibility) ; but you can have smux which doubles the hz at the cost of reducing the number of channels.
Personnaly I have hard time hearing more than 20000hz so 44100hz sampling is enough !

ADAT is 24 bit capable (not 16bit only)

So I do not see any real limitation in ADAT.
Would it be 16bit limited then yes ADAT would be worthless...
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2009, 01:03 PM   #204
Telstar is offline Telstar  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Quote:
Originally posted by ejaouen
44100 or 48000hz is the limit yes (if you want the 8 channel possibility) ; but you can have smux which doubles the hz at the cost of reducing the number of channels.
So, from a board like the RME with 8 ADAT channels you could have 2 24/192k channels (if you find a way to do that)?
__________________
The response of the inner ear extends to at least 200khz - Dr W. Tempest
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2009, 02:09 PM   #205
padam is offline padam  Hungary
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
My opinion is that the DAC used&implemented is more important than the resolution, I am perfectly happy using USB.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2009, 02:14 PM   #206
Hurtig is offline Hurtig  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Denmark - Århus
Is this thread gonna end up with some construction, or just a lot of talkin???
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2009, 04:18 PM   #207
ejaouen is offline ejaouen  France
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Hi hurtig,
Design me my AL1402G pcb and discussion is finished ! (I prefer through hole components when possible) : many asking PC to DAC how will have the answer from you !

Bonus : AL1402G chip is inexpensive

Telstar :
All recent adat RME cards have smux working and I think there is a document on wavefront website explaining how to make their AL1402G ADAT receiver chip accepting smux. You can have four channel 96k or stereo 192k.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2009, 03:37 AM   #208
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Default Status?

Quote:
Originally posted by Hurtig
Is this thread gonna end up with some construction, or just a lot of talkin???
Same question here. Are we making any real progress after 6 months worth of conversation?
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2009, 10:56 PM   #209
mr.duck is offline mr.duck  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Default Re: Status?

Quote:
Same question here. Are we making any real progress after 6 months worth of conversation? [/B]

How about using existing solutions and making the best of it? Like a pro USB audio interface (doesn't need to be expensive)... with optical spdif output. Just except that it's going to be jittery as hell and clean it up later like with a spdif or IIS reclock module. Optical is nice because it isolates things electrically.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2009, 12:45 PM   #210
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
The problem with this approach is to properly clean jitter, downsteam
device or devices will have to be expensive
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:57 PM.

Page generated in 0.09591 seconds (84.35% PHP - 15.65% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio