Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26th February 2007, 01:17 PM   #1
FYC is offline FYC  Hong Kong
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Default please help to clarify the coding

Sorry may be I am asking something well understood already.

Nevertheless, I am preparing to build a PLH amp. Reading the schematics, I found the resistor value a bit confusing.

I see both 220 and 221. My first interpretation is that the last digit refer to the number of zeros, so "220" = 22 ohms, and "221" = 220 ohms. But this will make the code "392" equal to 3900 ohms, which I expect it be a 392 ohm if I want to set the bias of the phase splitter current to the correct value.

So apparently the last digit does not carry any special meaning but "220" IS 220 ohms while "221" IS 221 ohms. But then why not standardize to 220 ohms?

Please help me to understand this and forgive me if this issue was well explained before.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2007, 01:37 PM   #2
medum is offline medum  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
medum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Jutland, Denmark
Default Re: please help to clarify the coding

Quote:
Originally posted by FYC

So apparently the last digit does not carry any special meaning but "220" IS 220 ohms while "221" IS 221 ohms. But then why not standardize to 220 ohms?

220 ohm are standard in normal 5% resistors
221 ohm are standard in 1% resistors

try to google "resistors E24" and "resistors E96"
numbers refer to steps between values.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2007, 01:50 PM   #3
FYC is offline FYC  Hong Kong
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Thanks for quick and clear answer.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Zero Positioning Coding;more processor power for Class D? The golden mean Class D 7 10th August 2006 01:15 PM
coding your own PCM to PWM converter? jwagnerhki Class D 2 15th November 2005 10:06 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:31 AM.

Page generated in 0.07982 seconds (69.81% PHP - 30.19% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio