|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: North of Boston
|
How much does the frequency response change for one watt output to full rated output power on a Pass labs amp? All the reviews I read are for small signal frequency response. Is there a difference. Does anyone have some data?
__________________
MikeW |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbia, SC
|
Mike,
Bode is the keyword you're searching for. As in Bode plot. Yes, the bandwidth shrinks as the power (interpret this as gain) increases. Chip opamps have really stupid open loop bandwidths...like 100Hz. It's only after you apply gonzo amounts of feedback that the bandwidth becomes tolerable. If you meditate on all the ramifications and implications of this junk you're likely to end up like me--meaning someone who thinks that 250kHz to 300kHz open loop bandwidth is a good start. I say that having just come up from the Dungeon wherein my Evil Experiments managed a whole, astounding 10kHz. Unsatisfactory. Need to stop and think things over. Bummer. Grey P.S.: Good talking to you. There's no one to talk audio with out here in the hinterlands. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North East
|
Grey, Southern R.I. isn't any better. But, MikeW, your only a stone's throw away...
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Formerly "jh6you". R.I.P.
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
Quote:
Somewhat difficult for me to understand. I am simplified. Nevertheless, as the rolloff is hapenning depending purely on the RC network, I understand that the rolloff point is independant of the power level. I.e. the bandwidth of an amp is the same at any power level. The distortion might be increased at the power increase, though. Where I'm wrong . . . ? |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
the hinterlands aren't in SC -- at least you guys know what a "grit" is.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
The one and only
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The one and only
|
A little later:
Since there was an XA100.5 on the bench being tested for frequency response, I checked it at 2W, 50W and 100W. It was 2 dB down at 100 KHz at 2W, 2 db at 50W, and 2.2 dB at 100W.
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sierra Foothills - California
|
So Nelson,
I don't recall having heard of an XA100.5 previously. What is the difference between it and the the XA100? Thanks. Graeme |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Formerly "jh6you". R.I.P.
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
Quote:
I guess the last value, 2.2dB, must be due to the accuracy tolerance of your farsighted glasses
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: North of Boston
|
Quote:
__________________
MikeW |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Understanding Zaph's Frequency Response and Power Handling Curves | jarsoffart | Multi-Way | 5 | 24th March 2009 08:29 PM |
| Output transformers and frequency response | dsavitsk | Tubes / Valves | 21 | 3rd December 2006 06:48 PM |
| frequency response | pmarcouxx | Digital Source | 2 | 20th July 2005 07:43 PM |
| Doubts on Phase Response and Frequency Response | dumrum | Multi-Way | 11 | 5th April 2004 10:39 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |