NP recommended rectifier diode?

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Jump to Latest
lineup

lineup

Member
Joined 2005
Nelson Pass said:
Try the STM BYW99W-200 listed by Digikey, and figure on
using the 2 diodes in it in parallel.
Click to expand...

calvert73.

Personally, I do not mind very much if my diodes
does soft, medium, hard or very hard recovering.

I have never cared about anything else, that my rectifier diodes
should in a good way rectify 50 Hertz AC to give DC output.


BYW99W-200. IT is a BIG DIODE. What I can see Max 15 Ampere.
Here is the datasheet: http://www.st.com/stonline/books/pdf/docs/2970.pdf

Packaged in SOT93, TOP3I or TO247
this device is intended for use in
- low voltage,
- high frequency inverters,
- free wheeling and
- polarity protection applications.
Click to expand...
**lineup note:
high frequency,
they most probably mean a bit higher than 50-60 Hertz
... but I may be wrong here :D


Regards
lineup
 
B

bobsinclar

Member
Joined 2006
About the diodes recovery, I can remember Nelson writing he liked them as slow as possible, and even using bypass caps around the bridge to slower them better...that's what i always follow, I rellly don't look for the best hifi diodes, did anyone found a real advantage in using specific diodes for the rectifiers, I have to admit that I always use the cheap 30A monoblocks from the market...
Vince
 
H

harryeng

Member
Joined 2004
How many diodes

Closely related is the question whether to use one, or two rectifier bridges.

After long discussions some time ago in the SS thread Nelson gave a very clear answer on that;

Most customers want total silence from the amplifier, including
mechanical noise. If there is not complete matching between the secondary coils and only 1 rectifier bridge, any net DC imbalance between the current of the + supply and the - will tend to saturate the core of the transformer and create noise. This is seen for quite low current differences and can also show up with low frequency output. Using two bridges eliminates the problem.

In the eyes of a manufacturer, any other subtle differences pale in comparison to the cost of having to replace a transformer in the field due to mechanical noise.
Click to expand...



Read the original here:

Greetings, Harry
 
Nelson Pass

Nelson Pass

The one and only
Joined 2001
Paid Member
bobsinclar said:
About the diodes recovery, I can remember Nelson writing he liked them as slow as possible, and even using bypass caps around the bridge to slower them better...that's what i always follow, I rellly don't look for the best hifi diodes, did anyone found a real advantage in using specific diodes for the rectifiers, I have to admit that I always use the cheap 30A monoblocks from the market
Click to expand...

In 60 Hz rectification applications, I think the advantage offered
by fast diodes is mostly spurious noise reduction. They do
seem to sound better, but apart from that, they are necessary
to meet increasingly stringent EMI standards in various countries.

:cool:
 
Andersonix

Andersonix

Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
I remember NP recommending the use of a small capacitor and resistor in series across each diode in a rectifier bridge, rather than the use of fancy diodes. Does anyone remember the values of the cap and resistor, where I read this (I think Audio Amateur), and if this is still recommended?
 
steenoe

steenoe

Member
Joined 2004
I remember NP recommending the use of a small capacitor and resistor in series across each diode
Click to expand...
I dont remember what NP recommended, but a 100nF X2 rated polyprop with 100r 0,6w in series, usually works out pretty well. The X2 rating is pretty good for a use like this. They are some sturdy little critters, that can take some beating;)

Steen:)
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Top Bottom