Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th December 2002, 03:24 PM   #1
loovet is offline loovet  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Outside Stockholm
Default Matching transistor Aleph 1.7

I don’t need to match any of the transistors in my Aleph 1.7.

Am I right here?

/loovet
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2002, 03:31 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CROATIA
Hello loovet,

You can use unmatched transistors for the Aleph P 1.7.
But, the matching is very easy, and if you use matched
transistors it would not hurt either.

Best regards,
Kristijan Kljucaric
http://web.vip.hr/pcb-design.vip
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2002, 08:47 PM   #3
loovet is offline loovet  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Outside Stockholm
Quote:
Originally posted by kristijan-k
Hello loovet,

You can use unmatched transistors for the Aleph P 1.7.
But, the matching is very easy, and if you use matched
transistors it would not hurt either.

Best regards,
Kristijan Kljucaric
http://web.vip.hr/pcb-design.vip
Thanks Kristijan,

I think that I will match them. As you said, not that much work.

Best regards,

/loovet
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2002, 09:01 PM   #4
swede is offline swede  Switzerland
diyAudio Member
 
swede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Default UrSv is the man...

Hi,

I just changed a set of output FET's on a SOZ for a friend in sweden. On one channel I used FET's matched by me, which resulted in about 100mV DC on the output. Not much and within margin of error. On the other channel I used two FET's matched by UrSv (frequent on this forum). The DC on the output was less than 10mV, which probably is on the "wrong" side of the accuracy of my DMM (digital multi meter) anyways.

So, UrSv should tell you how he did it. He usually uses constant current and measures the Vgs on the FET's. I used constant Voltage source and measured the current. UrSv won! ;=)

Best,
//magnus
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2002, 09:23 PM   #5
loovet is offline loovet  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Outside Stockholm
Shouldn’t I match them the way Kristijan and others (even N.P. himself) usually recommends? Look at the picture below.

Is there a better way to do the matching? Maybe UrSv can give us an answer to that question?

/loovet
Attached Images
File Type: gif matching.gif (24.6 KB, 650 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st December 2002, 09:53 AM   #6
swede is offline swede  Switzerland
diyAudio Member
 
swede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Default Matching

Hi,

Well, matching is just a matter of knowing Ohm and Kirchoff.

If you want to match the devices at a "specific" current, you have to use a variable voltage source. You start by connecting the devices like in the picture you posted above. Measure over the resistor and make sure that the current though it is exactly the current you like to match your devices at. When you are at the right current (for instance 5mA or 100mA or whatever current you like to match at), you measure the voltage over the gate and the source. This is what UrSv did, and you get an exact measure of the Vgs for the device at a given current.

When I matched my devices I was lazy and I didn't have a variable supply handy. This is not a big deal, though your devices will differ slightly in current. You will be quite close though, and devices with the same Vgs will have the same current flowing through them anyways (kirchoff). Hence, you will be able to get matched devices, but the different sets will be matched with a slightly different current (which in any case will not be too different after all).

It is just a matter of how picky you are.

When I built my first board for my Aleph P I just picked random FET's from my big scrap box, just making sure that they were TO220 and that I put N-channel and P-channel FET's at the right places. (i.e IRF9620 and IRF644 instead of 9610 and 610) It made sound, which was the goal for my exercise. Your exercise might be just a bit different. Some day I might upgrade it. ;=)

My advice, as usual: Try and build it. Make it work. Then, after all the hassle, start tweaking. Othervise, you'll never finish the project.

Best,
//magnus
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st December 2002, 11:03 AM   #7
loovet is offline loovet  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Outside Stockholm
I think I’ve got your point of view.

Of course, my first aim is to have the thing make any noise at all. And after that I will try to make some adjustments to make it play lovely music.

Different current will flow through different transistors. Am I right here? But then, wouldn’t it be possible to do it the other way around. Keep a stable voltage and then change the value of the resistor, maybe with help of a pot? I migth be verry wrong here ;-)

Best regards

/loovet
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st December 2002, 11:38 AM   #8
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Near to the Pacific Ocean
Hi loovet

The following is a quote from http://www.passdiy.com/pdf/balzenpre.pdf. I think the comment is also applicable to Aleph P rev1.7.

¡°It is not essential to match the MOSFETs used in this project, but it doesn't hurt either. I have tested the circuit with matched and random parts with insignificant performance differences. There are other circuits that take advantage of matching, but because of the separate bias sources for each device and the high value of resistance between the Source pins of the two devices, this circuit is indifferent to matching. The exception is the case where R15 has a small value for the purpose of very high gain. Under this circumstance, matching will improve performance, and I recommend Vgs matching to within .1 V or better.¡±

Enjoy your DIY.

JH
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Transistor matching graham-r Parts 1 6th May 2009 07:21 PM
ltp transistor matching sakis Solid State 16 7th January 2009 05:33 PM
transistor matching derekyu Solid State 38 26th May 2007 07:57 AM
How to matching PNP with NPN Transistor senee Solid State 16 7th March 2005 11:12 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:17 PM.

Page generated in 0.10262 seconds (78.31% PHP - 21.69% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio