|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: sweden
|
What would be the best option in rectifier diodes...im a bit sceptical thatr i will hear any differende...(against ordinary diodes in paralell with a small cap to slow the down) but since im doing this amp overly seriosly i think it would be propper to atleast look in to the diod bull**it...;-)
any recomendations ? /micke |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I've used soft recovery diodes in DACs before and was very pleased with the results. I'm with you on this one however in that I really don't feel it would make a huge difference in an amplifier situation (DACs are particularly noise sensitive). Then again, hang the expense, why not use them anyway.
Cheers, Pete Fleming |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Scandinavia
|
Consider using Schottky diodes. They are cheaper than say HexFred's or QuietFred's but only come in about 100V rating. I will use Schottky for the driver stage and probably HexFred's for the power section.
This is a majority carrier diode, and there is thus no reverse recovery. The Fred's mentioned have soft (reverse) recovery). Petter |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Yes indeed, to be more precise it was also Schottky diodes that I used too.
Cheers, Pete |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Germany
|
I agree with NP on fast diodes for high power amps. They donīt offer much in amplifiers. Just use good normal diodes and also take care of the typical precautions in using the correct caps where needed. You will have excellent results.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The one and only
|
On the other hand, Schottky diodes are way cool.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Given Schottky's lower forward voltage drop, I'd say they
>are< pretty cool! I've held off using them in power amplifiers because the 100 PIV rating of the units I can easily get is a bit marginal. But I gather that's about to change as new semiconductor materials become available. But the ultimate in "cool" are probably syncronous rectifiers. Dunno how they rate for noise characteristics. (In case you're wondering, this is just a power transistor with its base/gate wired to a low voltage winding that forces it into saturation--it thus acts like a rectifier. A bit too busy for our purposes, but an interesting idea that might be worth exploring some day.) |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: sweden
|
but isnt 100V enough safty margin? ...in my aleph they will never se more than 48v and that is peak to peak value..
Is there any preferable brand among Schottskys? and what spec are inportant when used in rectyfiers? /micke |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
|
Irf have some 150V devices for a bit more margin. Try 30CPQ150, for example.
Jake |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: sweden
|
nice...but those suckers are about 10$ a piece here in sweden...and that is in 25pcs quantites...(farnell.com)
any cheaper advice? /micke |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What is the prefered meathod for controling volume | peteS | Solid State | 28 | 1st March 2009 12:26 PM |
| Prefered wavelength for UV exposure | cosmox | Everything Else | 2 | 20th April 2004 02:06 PM |
| prefered crossover freq for scan speak 9500's | D1GGY | Multi-Way | 12 | 12th May 2003 09:44 PM |
| Prefered type of components | JDeV | Tubes / Valves | 32 | 17th March 2003 11:21 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09950 seconds (79.09% PHP - 20.91% MySQL) with 10 queries |