Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th September 2001, 12:03 AM   #1
punk is offline punk  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Long Island ,NY
hi everyone,
I want to build the zen amp, but in my area (north of Italy) it is quite difficult to find IRFP140, IRFP9240 and IRFP9140. (in fact, I found irfp9140, but they are too expensive 10 U$ each or so...)
I'd like to try IRF9540 + IRF540; they are really cheap and I can get them at my local store. I just need some suggestions, maybe other people tryied them out.

Do they sound well? Are there any electrical "troubles" or things I should know about these MOSFETs?
Looking at the datasheets, I think I probably can put them into the circuit and they'll work just fine without changing other components.
Please send me your comments and suggestions !

P.S.: I've been building every kind of loudspeakers for many years but just one (bad) MOS amplifier !
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2001, 01:44 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Norway
Arrow irf 540 _ ZEN

HI!

I've used the irf540 in my first version of my SOZ, and it worked quite well. I guess it would work in the zen also. BUT, the irfp 140 is by far better sounding in my opinion. If I were in your position, I would toss out the extra $, knowing that it would work, and that it sounds better. It will be cheaper/easier to buy the best ones first, than to substitute later. Remember, the type of mosfet you use in this designs play a significant role in the performance/sound quality of the amp. I don't think this is the place to save money!

good luck!

ps! the to-247 casing on the irfp140 is by far superior to the to-220 casing on the irf540...
__________________
Mads K
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th October 2001, 03:32 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Australia
Hi Mad K,

Can you please explain why the TO-247 casing is better than the TO-220 casing?

Also I am looking at parts to built a Zen amp. The IRFP140 FET is too expensive (AUS$19) compared to the IRFP140N (AUS$5.40) . On the Fairchild data sheet for the IRFP140, this product is not recommended, possible substitute IRFP140N.

Have you or any one out there used the 140N instead of 140. What is the main difference between the two?

Thanks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th October 2001, 06:18 PM   #4
The one and only
 
Nelson Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
The choice of device for the P channel current
source does not have much effect on the sound,
but the best choice for the N channel device in
my experience is the IRFP040, which is no longer
made.

The 040 is doped a little differently than the 140
or 240 and the lower withstand voltage comes with
higher transconductance, which accounts for the
better performance.

I have a very small stash of them, but most of
the time I use the much higher voltage IRFP240 as I
have lots of them laying around.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th October 2001, 02:58 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Norway
Default irfp 140 /to-247

the to-247 casing is better because it makes a lower Rth (thermal resistance) with the heatsink, pluss you don't have to use a spacer on the mounting bolt (plastic casing). you still have to insulate it from the heatsink with mica+grease/or sil-pad.
read this article, it explaines a little more:
http://sound.westhost.com/heatsinks.htm

-use the irfp 140N, it's great! I don't actually know what the difference between the irfp 140 / irfp 140N, but I think it is just minor (maybe an improvement? N for new or something? someone else who knows?)

PS! When I ordered irfp150's, I actually got irfp150N instead...



__________________
Mads K
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2001, 06:40 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
promitheus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Germany
IRF540 and IRF9540 are cheaper of course but smaller.
They are as good as the larger ones but they canīt work so well with a high bias because their case canīt dissipate heat so good as the TO-247 package. For a small amp they are ok.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2001, 08:04 AM   #7
djk is offline djk
diyAudio Member
 
djk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
In general we don't want the 'N' versions for audio.The 'N' stands for new and improved.For switching use.The original 540 was 125W, the 'N' is only 94W for the same Rds and drain current.Improved process allows for less area for the same switching performance.But less area means less Pd.The Logic Level 540 is only 42W.So far the P channel devices have not been 'improved'.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2002, 01:03 AM   #8
Warp Engineer
On Holiday
 
AudioFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Queensland, Australia
Quote:
Originally posted by hlvan
On the Fairchild data sheet for the IRFP140, this product is not recommended, possible substitute IRFP140N.
I believe that Fairchild are recommending the newer IRFP140N instead of the IRFP140 because it has the same switching performance on a smaller chip and so is cheaper. But this is not helpful to us so it is better to use the older IRFP140.......

Does anyone know if the IRFP140 is a relyable part? should i just get the IRFP240 from IRF and be done with it?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2002, 01:28 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
vdi_nenna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PA, USA
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via Yahoo to vdi_nenna
Red face What?

I have been using the IRFP044n for a year now. I'm using it in my 10 watt Zen. This is no good? The sound is very good.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2002, 02:04 AM   #10
Warp Engineer
On Holiday
 
AudioFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Queensland, Australia
you can use the 'n' parts but for our purposes the original non 'n' parts are better
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JBL D130 best alternative(s)? DGGomez Multi-Way 1 15th August 2008 11:32 AM
Alternative MOSFETS >jacko< Parts 5 25th March 2007 09:02 AM
n/p Mosfets vs depletion mod mosfets marcello7x Car Audio 6 4th October 2006 05:01 AM
alternative Dj BASS AMP Solid State 0 9th November 2002 09:00 PM
Alternative's pete.a Parts 1 28th July 2002 12:57 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:26 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright Đ1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2