|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Dear all, its been a while since I have an aleph L clone designed so that the output potentiometer is half of the one found in aleph P(the L circuit is a single ended one). I used my PC spectrum analyzer to measure distortion.
So what I used was input sine of .8V rms, output was 4.5Vrms loaded with 20K. To my astonishment, I got at the minimum volume setting 1% THD and at the maximum setting 0,09% THD. I pressume something is way wrong with the output pot, is it logical? I believe that at lower settings the output of the pre is loaded with with very low resistance causing distortion.If yes how can I improve this? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The one and only
|
It is not logical, but you are not presenting enough data for
conclusive opinion. If your output pot is being used as a shunt to ground and you are still demanding high output levels, you can easily get that effect, but for constant input levels, the distortion should not increase. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Dear Nelson,
Thank you for answering, you are correct, not enough info presented. So, I used the electronic pot of aleph P of one channel for both the L and R channels of my pre in the fashion of instead of + and - phase( in aleph P) I used L and R respectively. Just measured the actual resistances which are the the ones at the following schematic. Bviously when the pot is at lower setting the pre "sees" an impedance of 4K in parallel of whatever the load is, while at maximum setting sees only the load impedance. Do I have to exclude the electronic pot and replace it with a conventional one? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The one and only
|
Perhaps if only to help isolate the problem, but again, you need
to remember that the L's output is a current source which is variably shunted to ground. For an given input level, the distortion will be a constant compared to output level, but if you crank up the input level while lowering the volume to achieve the same output level, at some point you may overload the input. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| does lower B+ cause scratchy distortion? | PRNDL | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 20th June 2008 11:13 PM |
| Lower Distortion Alternatives to 12AT7 & 12AU7 ? | DrDeville | Tubes / Valves | 19 | 20th May 2004 10:45 PM |
| Excel W12 lower distortion than W15?!? | capslock | Multi-Way | 0 | 24th February 2004 11:34 AM |
| Bootstraping Op Amp substrate for lower Distortion | ppl | Solid State | 10 | 25th June 2003 09:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07460 seconds (72.90% PHP - 27.10% MySQL) with 11 queries |