New amp design ?

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Hello there

I have been working whit a new design (I think). It is a one stage amp. whit 0 dergree phaseshift, voltages gain and low output imp.

It sounds verry nicely, much like a single end tube amp. Please tell me what you think.

Regards
 

Attachments

  • frank40_amp1.png
    frank40_amp1.png
    45.4 KB · Views: 1,871
Edit : okay I see the ground is connected to the speaker through the 220 ohm resistor.

I'm still not sure what that pair does other than drive the 10 ohm resistor. That would stress the power supply. Not sure 5 watts is enough. I would think the effect would be dynamic range compression.

At this moment I am listening to my latest monstrosity, a 2 W / ch Zen-style source-follower amp. But in my memory, the Zen common source circuit sounded better. It seemed to effortlessly and happily give up music, and I had to drive it HARD, all 1 watt of it, to get it to sound bad. This one immediately sounded a little gritty to me, though I've gotten used to it.
 
Hi, Frank40,

It seems you build something like Crown's Grounded Bridge topology (like used in Crown MA600 or MA1200), where 1/2 power is used to modulate the supply ground (like Hafler's Transnova) + the other 1/2 half is working like normal power amp.

It sounds verry nicely

So it is working? How about input impedance? Does it needs powerfull preamp to drive it?
 
Voltage gain:

V(speaker)=V(in) * (1+ ( R12/R11) ) (approximately)

How do you get that? Could you describe how this works?

How many watts this amp gives? In what class, hot classA or cold classAB? Why R11 and R12 is 5watt rating, do they share all the speaker current? Does the supply stays rigid or modulated like Transnova?

That is the way I see it. Interesting idea
You're right. If this is not Crown's Grounded Bridge topology or neither Hafler's Transnova, and works good audio, Frank40 could apply a patent for it :D
 
Here is my simplified analysis.

Let the input signal be V(in).
V(in) is at the R9,R10,R11 node.
Thus the current I(R11) = V(in)/R11. (eqn A)
This current must return to the supplies via R12.
Thus lets call the voltage at the B1, B2, R12 node V(x).
Then the current through I(R12)= V(x)/R12. (eqn B)
But I(R12)= - I(R11)
Substituting using eqn A and eqn B.
V(in)/R11 = - V(x) /R12.
Then V(x) = -V(in) * ( R12/R11 ). (eqn C)
Also V(in) is at the R13,R14, speaker node.
Let V(out) be the voltage drop across the speaker.
Then V(out)= V(in)-V(x).
Using eqn C for V(x).
Thus V(out)= V(in)-( -V(in) * (R12/R11) ).
Simplifying,
Therefore V(out)=V(in) * (1+(R12/R11)) .

Tom
 
Tom2 said:
Here is my simplified analysis.

Let the input signal be V(in).
V(in) is at the R9,R10,R11 node.
Thus the current I(R11) = V(in)/R11. (eqn A)
This current must return to the supplies via R12.
Thus lets call the voltage at the B1, B2, R12 node V(x).
Then the current through I(R12)= V(x)/R12. (eqn B)
But I(R12)= - I(R11)
Substituting using eqn A and eqn B.
V(in)/R11 = - V(x) /R12.
Then V(x) = -V(in) * ( R12/R11 ). (eqn C)
Also V(in) is at the R13,R14, speaker node.
Let V(out) be the voltage drop across the speaker.
Then V(out)= V(in)-V(x).
Using eqn C for V(x).
Thus V(out)= V(in)-( -V(in) * (R12/R11) ).
Simplifying,
Therefore V(out)=V(in) * (1+(R12/R11)) .

Tom

I just love doing the math of a circuit...thanks for the above Tom!
:cool:
 
This is a very interesting CCT :D Never seen it done like this before.

Seems the speaker is running openloop. The feedback is only controlling point 2 of the speaker towards leftside of R11.

Point 1 of the speaker seems not to be exactly the same condition as left side of R11. R9 is not equal R13 (Q1 is not biased the same as Q2), plus the mis-matched between Q1 and Q2.
 
First off this is Frank40's amp so I hope I'm not offending him.
In fact I could be totally wrong in my math.


Lumanauw said:
here is something that blurring my view....
It seems the supplies do modulate about ground and affect the
operation of the mosfets. Ideally R1 and R4 could be replaced with
current souces. Perhaps another supply could work, I don't know.
I also ran a simulation and it shows this.

Blues said:
thanks for the above Tom!
Thanks Blues. The trick is to let the math do the work and let it
give the answer.


Mikew said:
But I(R12)= - I(R11)
I think I'm right. If the nodes are arbitrally assigned voltages
then the resulting currents flowing into the ground node have to
be equal in magnitude and opposite in sign. I don't see any way the currents could escape via ground.

Fcarpa58 said:
input impedance very low (1k ?)
I don't think so?


Again, thanks to Frank40 for his fabulous amp.

Tom
 
Hi there

Here is an explanation on how the circuit works. It is really quit simple if we break it down
to it’s most simple form. I won’t go into great details (Languish problem). Compare fig 1 and fig 2 and you will see that all it takes is an extra resistor. (No bias is shown.)

The gain is set buy 1+R1/R2 (approximately).

Now you can place the load directly to the sources on Q1, but the load will affect the response
of the amp. My first amp was build like fig 2. It worked but with no great success.

It toke me a while to realize that I had voltage gain if I measured from the power ground to the input, so I just added a Mos- fet more. See fig 3. And now the load is isolated from the gain circuit.

Please feel free to modify the circuit and post your result on the topic.

Sorry for my poor English, but I hope that it helped.

To lumanauw :

I used +/- 25 volt on my amp and I got 25W/ 8ohm out of it. I build it so I cot run hot A/B whit 500mA bias. But you can run it higher, it’s a question of cooling.
 

Attachments

  • cap131.jpg
    cap131.jpg
    16.4 KB · Views: 648
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.