|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
|
Hi,
I'm giving some thought to building a multi-channel pre-amp, based on BOSOZ or other balanced single-ended topolgy. I'm unlikely to use balanced sources (i.e., source devices will connect through singe-ended inputs), but will probably use balanced outputs. In that case, is there any real advantage for the "X" or super symmetry variations on the basic BOSOZ topology? Thanks and regards, |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
|
If you are thinking of using its capability as a unbalanced-to-balanced converter, you might consider replacing the 750 ohm resistors in the Sources of the MOSFETs with constant current sinks.
(Not that it wouldn't work okay as is... I just found it to work a little better with the CCSes.) I didn't attempt the shunt feedback/X modification so I won't comment on that.
__________________
Would a woodchuck bother to chuck MDF? |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
|
Quote:
Thanks, Rob |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbia, SC
|
Well, there's surrent sources and then there's current sources...
I think you guys are talking about two different applications. eLarson, I suspect, is thinking in terms of a CCS under the SOZ, replacing the resistors that bias the differential. This will not increase the gain. Won't decrease it, either. But it will make the amp function better as a phase splitter, which will be useful if you're using unbalanced input signals. weinstro is thinking of CCSs as loads to the gain devices. Yes, if you use a CCS as a load for a gain device, you'll get more gain. It constitutes an infinite load. The problem you run into there is that the DC won't be quite stable. Note that Nelson published the schematic for the F1 (?) not too long ago. It has a couple of resistors that address this very problem. Multi-channel implies AV use, which in turn implies at least occasional explosions, volcanoes, earthquakes, and other heartbreaks. The SOZ may not be for you...unless you have very, very efficient speakers indeed. For what's it's worth, I did a thread on the SOZ with current sources (supplying the differential--not loads) at one point, and offered a schematic with a working circuit for same. Grey |
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
|
Thanks, Grey
Quote:
Quote:
That said, this is distinctly for a preamp. I already have a bunch of traditional amplifers (Hafler, Sumo, Marantz) that will be used to drive my inefficient bass-reflex speakers. The idea I'd like to pursue is multi-channel volume and switching control, zero to low feedback, balanced output. Given the line level outputs, it makes me wonder if I just really need a buffer/follower with a volume knob. But, I'm intrigued by the elegance and simplicity of the balanced, single-ended circuits. |
||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbia, SC
|
My fault...I'm short on sleep and read BOSOZ as SOZ.
Given that the BOSOZ is cap-coupled at the output, you can disregard my previous notes about DC offset unless you feel like guilding the lily. At the risk of shooting myself in the foot again, I'd recommend at least 6-12dB of gain, perhaps as much as 18dB. Line level outputs are not always enough to drive amps to full power, especially if you end up with a soundtrack/CD/whatever that's mastered lower than usual. You'll need a touch of gain to make up the difference. Grey |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Göteborg
|
As GRollins said the CCS instead of sourceresistors will give a better performance when running this circuit as a singelend/balanced converter, and with Xfeedback you can set the gain to anything you like within the limits of the circuit.
__________________
We live in a horizontal world, why use vertical topologies??? |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ingolstadt Germany
|
and,
X will work with a balanced output regardless of input. William
__________________
een ooievaar is geen konijn want zijn oren zijn te klein! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| UcD like topology amp. | Bender.ru | Class D | 232 | 21st March 2012 03:55 AM |
| To BOSOZ or not to BOSOZ... please comment. | spence | Pass Labs | 4 | 27th February 2012 02:57 AM |
| Poll! What do you use in your X-BOSOZ or BOSOZ for Volume Control and Input Selector? | promitheus | Pass Labs | 87 | 19th February 2006 03:15 PM |
| X-bosoz vs. CCS X-bosoz, how does the sound compare? | acliao | Pass Labs | 14 | 26th February 2004 12:55 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11421 seconds (78.86% PHP - 21.14% MySQL) with 10 queries |