Zen Variations Part 3: regulated supply question - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 2nd January 2006, 08:10 PM   #1
Decker is offline Decker  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Francisco
Default Zen Variations Part 3: regulated supply question

I'm building the bipolar version of the Zen regulated supply for an amp project. I have a question about Figure 6 from the Zen Variations 3 article: does the PNP Mosfet Q2 in that diagram have the source and drain connections reversed, or is it correct as printed? Figure 7 has the same layout. I'm scratching my head over this one, so any help would be appreciated.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2006, 12:12 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbia, SC
The IRFP9240 (Q2) in Figure 6 is drawn upside-down. Ditto for Q2 & Q4 in Figure 7.
When hooked up correctly, the pass device would present its Source to the load (instead of its Drain), thus becoming a follower.
If you're going the bipolar route, you could always use the Zener stack to set the reference for a driver transistor--whether bipolar or MOSFET--and use that to drive non-Darlington pass devices...but the circuit would get more complex. Just depends on what you have on hand.

Grey

P.S.: MOSFETs are generally referred to as "N-channel" or "P-channel" instead of NPN or PNP like bipolars. The IRFP9240 is a P-ch device.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2006, 12:15 AM   #3
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Near to the Pacific Ocean
Refer to Fig.7.
Drain of N-Channel MOSFET (IRF240) sees +53V and its Source sees +45V.
Drain of P-Channel MOSFET (IRF9240) sees -45V and its Source sees -53V.
Both Drains have higher voltages than Sources (This is my clue to the avoidance of confusion.).

Regards
jh
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2006, 01:46 AM   #4
flg is offline flg  United States
diyAudio Member
 
flg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North East
"avoidance of confusion." ???
"Both Drains have higher voltages than Sources" ???
I'm getting confused now... My figure 7 agrees with what Grey said... Q2 and Q4 are up-side-down... But then, -45V could be considered "higher" than -53V Perspectives perspectives. As my Grandma used to say "to each his own".
__________________
"It was the perfect high end audio product: Exotic, inefficient, expensive, unavailable, and toxic." N.P.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2006, 04:31 AM   #5
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Near to the Pacific Ocean
Oh my God . . .

You are right Q2 and Q4 upside down.
And -53 is negatively higher than -45.

Full shame on me from the first day of new year.
I will stop my poor post from today. Bye bye.

Happy new year.

Regards
jh
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2006, 09:57 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
GeorgeBoles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Default A slightly different Zen 3 power supply question

Hello everyone,

My question is slightly different. I have been going to ask this for a while but didn't think it important enough to start a new thread!

Regarding the Zen 3 power supply, the statement is that at least the simplest version (Figure 1) is not suitable for Class AB or B amplifiers.

Quote:
This figure is not particularly great as a regulator, and ordinarily we
would look to improve on it, usually by enclosing the regulator transistor
in a feedback loop to correct for this variation. If this were a higher
power Class B or AB type amplifier, such an output impedance could
easily result in one or two Volts of nonlinear distortion signal in the power
supply, and this would bleed into the output circuit as distortion.
Is that true for the final versions, i.e. for Figures 2, 6 and 7?

If figure 6 and 7 are suitable for Class A and AB amplifiers, this would be a really simple and useful circuit!

What do you think Mr. Pass meant?

Regards,

George.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th January 2006, 12:25 AM   #7
Decker is offline Decker  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Francisco
Thanks, GR!
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Zen Variations Part 5 gpsmithii Pass Labs 0 30th October 2003 06:08 PM
Zen Variations part 4 Nelson Pass Pass Labs 34 29th August 2002 11:23 PM
Zen & Zen Variations-Part.2 billy Pass Labs 1 7th August 2002 06:24 PM
Zen Variations Part 2 Posted Nelson Pass Pass Labs 43 19th April 2002 10:42 PM
Zen Variations Part 2 Posted Nelson Pass Solid State 3 30th March 2002 01:30 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:22 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2