|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
I was searching the past postings about volume controls and pots locations. In posting #72 the attached drawing was given. I am interested in connecting a pot in the "C" position. However, I am confused exactly how to connect it? Is the connection being shown,is it in parallel or in series?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Near to the Pacific Ocean
|
Your question is the most difficult one I have ever read here.
Anyhow, Fig.3 on the original article, Balanced Zen Line Stage, in www.passdiy.com answers clearly. There is one pot on the + input side and another on the – input side for one channel. The same will apply for the other channel. So, total four pots for both channels. And, the four look like arranged in parallel. Regards jh |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ingolstadt Germany
|
Hi,
the balanced pot is connected between the two points shown as a variable resistor (very straightforward). If you want to use one I would think about position C. This has the advantage that noise is also recuced when you reduce the volume control. I´ve used one just like that for my X-BOSOZ. It may be neccessary to use a stepped control with resistors because you need very low values and most pots (for stereo) are not matched enough in this area. William
__________________
een ooievaar is geen konijn want zijn oren zijn te klein! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: -
|
I suggest you re-read the original BOSOZ paper and look at fig. 3.
Neither of your marked positions represent the original proposed method. Position "A" will work perfectly though but you have to find the right values for all resistive parts of the output network. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ingolstadt Germany
|
just looked at he pic again,
read my C for an A.(at the output) William
__________________
een ooievaar is geen konijn want zijn oren zijn te klein! |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Netherlands
|
Hi,
I have experimented a lot with various volume control options for the BOSOZ (passdiy) including option C. With option C there was some hiss audible, which was absent when the gates of the MOSFETs were not connected. Just my 2 cents. Fox |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
Quote:
Thanks for the replies.... I don't understand the above posting. So do most people agree that C position would be best for a pot? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ingolstadt Germany
|
No,
the pot should be between the two outputs with two series resistors (around 1k). There´s a thread somewhere about this that was started by me (X-BOSOZ) If I find it I´ll post it. William here it is: (the last post with the schematic) X-BOSOZ first tests
__________________
een ooievaar is geen konijn want zijn oren zijn te klein! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Poll! What do you use in your X-BOSOZ or BOSOZ for Volume Control and Input Selector? | promitheus | Pass Labs | 87 | 19th February 2006 04:15 PM |
| BOSOZ Volume Control - any suggestion | ruangrit | Pass Labs | 15 | 11th February 2003 12:56 AM |
| BOSOZ volume control | ToB | Pass Labs | 7 | 23rd August 2002 07:39 PM |
| BOSOZ Selector/volume control wiring? | SteveA | Pass Labs | 4 | 2nd March 2002 04:07 PM |
| BOSOZ Volume Control | rothko | Pass Labs | 5 | 23rd January 2002 04:38 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10231 seconds (74.84% PHP - 25.16% MySQL) with 11 queries |