|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
|
Buying the Forte 1A kind of killed my Aleph budget, but I have plenty of parts available to make an amp of some other kind. I've been thinking about it a lot lately (instead of doing homework assignments, projects, etc.)... I've always loved the X-SOZ and the Zen-lite... and I would love to have both combined into one. This will turn into my Christmas break project.
Attached is a first-draft schematic. I have an old 30-0-30 transformer that is big and heavy (probably 10 pounds or more). I don't know the VA rating, but I think it'll be sufficient. I figure after it gets loaded by four FETs, it's recitified voltage will settle in at around 80VDC, which is what I included in the circuit. I could drop it some more with a CRC filter (which I'll probably do). I don't have the spare money for huge heatsinks, so this won't be a 20W monster SOZ, it'll be more like a 2W version. Would these heatsinks be suitable if I put one FET per sink? I figure with one 150W light bulb, the idle current will be around 700mA per FET, which is low, so each will then dissipate 50-60W. At the moment, I am leaning toward a single rail supply over a double. Any reason why I shouldn't do this? I am also unsure of the value to use for the input pot. I really want to include it because I would like it to be an integrated solution. This was a big problem with the Forte; I had to build a separate passive preamp (oxymoron?) so I didn't deafen myself. I am currently thinking about IRF230 for the FETs, it I can find them. I have a pretty good general idea of where I'd like to go with this, but I really wonder... would it be worth it? I'll only get about 2W, which is totally fine. I usually listen at about 50-60dB through my 102dB 1W/m speakers, so I am only using milliwatts anyway. But, will this be a good, clean 2W, or will it be loaded with distortion? Thanks for any pointers. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The one and only
|
Looks to me like the circuit will work, but I wonder about the
80V supply - it seems like way more than you will want. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
|
Thanks for the reply.
I was thinking the same thing about the supply voltage... Perhaps if I cut it in half to about 40V? I only lack a few parts, so I suppose I can collect the remaining ones and give it a try (after finals and projects, though...). |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
|
Will the distortion go up significantly for such a low bias current? Would it be too much distortion to take?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The one and only
|
The distortion is very dependent on the current, less so on
the voltage, so you want to look for a balance there. When I do development work, I often just use a variable supply sao that I can dial it in most easily. In your case, an existing fixed ~40V supply and a Variac ($39 cheap) would assist you. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lowthers worth the effort? | Shaun | Full Range | 4 | 3rd April 2008 04:49 PM |
| Yamaha CDC-615, Worth the effort? | OzMikeH | Digital Source | 2 | 4th April 2007 01:49 AM |
| AT1100 arm worth the effort? | tubenut | Analogue Source | 8 | 5th November 2005 10:42 PM |
| Is it worth the effort? | reticent67 | Car Audio | 10 | 6th July 2004 04:53 AM |
| Is this mod worth the effort? | clevegilbert | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 27th January 2004 01:23 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10774 seconds (67.26% PHP - 32.74% MySQL) with 11 queries |