Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Heatsink: Thermal Resistance Vs Length
Heatsink: Thermal Resistance Vs Length
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th October 2002, 03:20 AM   #1
vinay is offline vinay
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle
Question Heatsink: Thermal Resistance Vs Length

This relationship is not linear. I was plugging away some numbers at the Thermalloy site. A heat sink rated at 0.9 degrees/watt/3" is only 0.44degrees at 12 inches (and 0.62 at 6" and 0.5 at 9")

My thermodynamics is a bit rusty, but I thought that the longer the heatsink, longter the length between the fins, thus getting more of the chimney effect.

So, what are peoples experiences in this matter. I have a couple of 0.75 degrees/3" rated heatsinks that are 12" long. Should I cut them down to 6" and use them? I was leaning to stereo chassis (smaller footprint), but monos are OK.


  Reply With Quote
Old 14th October 2002, 03:48 AM   #2
roddyama is offline roddyama  United States
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
roddyama's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
Hi Vinay,

The longer heatsink has a couple things working against it WRT convection cooling. As the air takes heat away from the fins of the heat sink as it moves upward, the heated air has a smaller temperature differential with the heatsink and therefore become less effective as the heatsink become longer. Adding to this ineffectiveness is the fact that the heated air is less dense (fewer molecules / volume) making it even more difficult for the air to take heat away from the heatsink.

This being the case, you would gain nothing by cutting them to 6 and stacking them one atop the other. The decision to cut them will depend on how much cooling you need. Are you sure that the 12 length is too long for your cooling needs?

Rodd Yamas***a
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th October 2002, 05:34 AM   #3
ThingyNess is offline ThingyNess  Canada
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Send a message via ICQ to ThingyNess
In most cases, I believe those numbers are also considered with a single point source radiating heat in the center of the sink.

If you had 30 heat sources all spread across the surface of the sink, the 0jc would be a lot better.

Example: if you have 4 transistors spaced equally along the sink and it's 12" long, the effective thermal resistance will indeed be 1/4 that of the 3" long piece.

( a little worse actually, depending on the orientation + power dissipated due to temperature differential between top + bottom of the sink, but not much worse)
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th October 2002, 07:21 AM   #4
UrSv is offline UrSv  Sweden
diyAudio Member
UrSv's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sweden

Excuse me if I am assuming something here but it seems that your numbers suggest that you use the width rather than the length. The 0.9 K/W/3" is for a profile with a height (which then as it is an extrusion is called length) and the numbers when increasing the length/height are not linear. The profile cross-section (image of the surface where it was cut) stays the same in all dimensions. So to clarify even more the same profile with the fins oriented vertically in a chassis with a HEIGHT of 3" may end up at 0.5 K/W and the same chassi depth but 6" height may end up at 0.35 K/W.

  Reply With Quote
Old 14th October 2002, 01:27 PM   #5
vpharris is offline vpharris  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Philadelphia
Default heatsink length correction

Those replies are all good points.

At the Aavid site, click on "technical info" at the top of the page, and you can find your way to this page with info about temperature and length correction factors.


In part they say "Because the heat load is assumed to be at a point rather than uniformly distributed, thermal resistance does not change linearly with length. (The ends of a very long extrusion would be cooler than the center and therefore the transfer of heat to the surrounding air is little, if any.) It is therefore necessary to apply a correction factor to published data for extrusion lengths shorter or longer than three inches. "

There are a number of other technical articles there that ought to help you become an expert too.
Vince Harris
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2002, 03:09 AM   #6
vinay is offline vinay
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle

Thanks for the responses. The point source now makes sense why the thermal resistance does not drop linearly with length of heatsink.

  Reply With Quote


Heatsink: Thermal Resistance Vs LengthHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
calculate thermal resistance of alumimium heatsink bigpanda Everything Else 1 17th September 2008 09:14 AM
Thermal Resistance of 2sc5200 goodlife Parts 2 21st April 2005 09:41 PM
heatsinking and thermal resistance theChris Parts 7 2nd April 2003 06:35 PM
Chassis and heatsink thermal paint arnach Everything Else 4 1st December 2002 01:49 AM
Thermal resistance of L-profile BoGoMiPz Solid State 0 31st October 2002 11:52 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:56 AM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 16.67%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio