Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th October 2002, 11:39 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: IN
Default thin midrange on pearl

I have just completed construction of the pearl phono amp. I have found the sound to be quite detailed but a bit bright, flat and fatiguing. At this point, I am hoping that I did something wrong.

I built the unit following the instructions closely. I decided to try using batteries to power the amp. I used three 12 V sealed lead acid batteries (5Ah) per channel.

I used the following equipment for my listening tests: VPI Aries Basic turntable, VPI JMW 10 tonearm, Grado Reference Sonata cartridge (47 kohms, 320 pF loading), NAD integrated amp, Definitive Technology BP2002 speakers. All comparisons were made versus my old NAD PP1 phono stage.

I enjoy a lush, warm midrange. The midrange of the my pearl is thin. Could this be due to my power supply? Do I need to load my Grado down with a bit more capacitance?

Any suggestions would be appreciated.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2002, 05:47 AM   #2
marjan is offline marjan  Slovenia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: slovenija
I don`t know about pearl phono section, but I was quite suprised with changes in soud (on beter) during burn in period in my Aleph 2. After 150 hours there where clearly audiable improowement`s on all aspects of reproduction. Maybe you shoud give it some time.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2002, 07:09 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Italy
I second with marjan and ...

I have experience with Grado Prestige Gold , I would try (instead of more capacitance) a lower input resistor .

The cartridge itself need at least 100+ hours for burning.

Love Pearls and Grados.

Cheers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2002, 05:35 PM   #4
The one and only
 
Nelson Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
When I hear thin phono cartridge, I lower the input
resistance as the first step.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2002, 05:45 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
chris ma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Pickering, Canada
When I hear thin phono cartridge
First step, I'll check the tracking force first, it may be too light to the spec of the cartridge?
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2002, 07:07 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
analog_sa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
emillam

yes, the batteries may contribute to your problem. all bateries have different tonal qualities, so even if i don't normally associate thin tonal balance with lead acid batteries, your particular brand may be to blame. Minimalist circuits usually have great transparency but could easily sound thin, unless of course they're minimalist but with valves. You may wish to play around with resistor types and use carbon instead of metal film. What are your filter caps? I don't personally subscribe much to the burn-in theories unless you're using black gates. Not much more you can do before you pronounce the NAD a winner. I have long lost touch with NADs but years ago they had pretty nice phono stages in their better integrateds and i wouldn't describe them as thin.

peter
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th October 2002, 02:37 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: IN
Default Thanks for the input.

I am experimenting with reducing the value of the input resistor. It has helped a great deal. I still wouldn't call the midrange warm or lush, but it not as thin as it once was. At the moment I have installed a pot so that I can play with this vlaue. How low do I dare go? Right now I have found that 30 kohms sounds fairly good.

My output capacitor is an XEON polypropylene type.

I have increased my tracking force as far as I feel comfortable going. I am running the Grado at 1.6 g (the reccomendation is 1.5 g).

My cartridge is well broken in, I will give my phono amp more time.

I would like to thank everyone for all of the suggestions. They have been very helpful.

Evan
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OB Reflection - cheap & thin Bluto Full Range 16 14th April 2008 04:03 AM
Thin alu foil for ribbons ? Henckel Planars & Exotics 9 30th December 2007 10:35 PM
long-thin vs fat-short TL Henkjan Full Range 26 22nd October 2006 07:54 PM
Anyone tried a thin slate armboard..? owen Analogue Source 7 5th January 2006 11:58 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:17 PM.

Page generated in 0.10201 seconds (77.02% PHP - 22.98% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio