diyAudio (
-   Pass Labs (
-   -   A75 front-end collapsed (

ckwong99 25th August 2005 06:18 AM

A75 front-end collapsed
Hello all,

When I have do my A75's front end voltage gain adjustment, found the circuit not very stable. During adjust P1 & P2 VR acknowledge from OCR both input and output signal turn very bad. I think it may due to the circuit self-oscillate. Not sure to change the series resistor value of the Gate of FET would be helpful on it .

Every times I look my PSU display 30mA per channel using. The input signal shaping is good but no output voltage gain. There should not enough power for the circuit, then I try to adjust P1 & P2 VR . Somehow it suddenly surge more current about 70mA per channel then my both input and output signals collapsed.

1) Where and what resistors value can be modified ?

2) Can any other way to restrict the self-oscillation ?

3) Once change the values will the gain also be changed ?

4) Will it be affect by without matching the input differentiate pairs ?

Thanks for your attention.


BobEllis 25th August 2005 10:31 AM

CK -

Did you use a local bypass on the power supplies? If you use the audioexpress boards (published layout) and don't add some capacitance to ground at the rail connection on the boards, they have a tendency to oscillate. try 100 uf with a 100 nf film on each rail.

Did you ever have any voltage gain? If always no gain, check that the feedback 75K resistor is in the right place and you don't have a jumper where it should be. (Are you trying to use 100% feedback from the output stage?) I made this mistake and it caused a channel to self destruct.

Not using matched devices in the differential pair makes it harder to balance the offset.

Sounds like you may have blown some FETs - the safe thing is to replace all. I used IRF610/9610 for the differential pair after blowing the last IRFD210/9210s that I had. Just bend the leads making sure they don't touch. I don't think it made a noticeable difference in the sound.

good luck

ckwong99 25th August 2005 06:22 PM

Hello Bob,

A general PSU bought from the shop not a PCB type as you said. Shall I add the bypass caps on the rail ?

I counter checked with the gain circuit is correct. There the problem is not no gain that was only due to the starting current too small ( I had checked reference voltage on R9=4V and R7=0.4V). However, if increase the current adjusts P2 then oscillation occurred, although the voltage gained output shown but not high enough and worst.
I use R81=600, R3=15K, R27=open, R2=470, R29=open. I have chosen a partially feedback.

Recall that you taught me use IRF610/9610 instead of IRF210/9210. So they have already done. (Do you still remember our chat at this column about a month ago ? I also query about the bias FET I adopted K216. The final result is acceptable bias voltage can be under controlled by the resistors network no need make modify. Thanks for your advice.)

I read from Nelson’s DIY paper again find his comment when oscillation encounter can first increase the Gate resistor value. After change those value to 300 ohm (without change 4 input FET resisters). Seems the problem was cleared. Nevertheless its output waveform is not very sharp, clear and high enough.

Do you think the voltage gain will be decreased by using higher resistor value on the Gate from 100 to 300 ?

Thanks for your kinly help.


Nelson Pass 25th August 2005 07:02 PM


Originally posted by ckwong99
Do you think the voltage gain will be decreased by using higher resistor value on the Gate from 100 to 300 ?
On these parts, 300 ohms will have minimal effect on performance.
These values will affect the bandwidth of the output transistors,
but not 610's and 9610's.

Sometimes you just have to play around with the values a bit,
and then suddenly everything starts to work. Remember that
the front end board by itself is no capable of driving the output
RC network of the amplifier, but it is often included on the front
end board. If your front end appears to work at very low
frequencies, but not in the midband, then this would be your


ckwong99 26th August 2005 02:32 AM

Thanks to Nelson.

As you mentioned just play around a little on the Gate resistor value I had completely solve the problem. Do you consent to me to change 4 input FETs gate resistor value ?

The front end now have a gain in full range but not high enough and used to its output waveform not in pretty.

Up to this time I only test the front end separate from the output stage of the AMP. When unstable case occurred I found it impossible generate the output, as well the input signal also be collapsed.


ckwong99 29th August 2005 06:08 AM

Hello Bob & Nelson & All,

The last situation of my A75 front end is stable with a clean and clear voltage output operated in 100K Hz or above without any abnormal appeared. The following some changes were be done.

1) R17-R20 = 300
2) R21-R22 = 50
3) R27 = empty
4) R3 = 50K
5) R81 = 680
6) Q1-2 = IRF610
7) Q4-5 = IRF9610

However, its voltage gain is still not enough, the Vp-p OUT is about 20 times of Vp-p IN (1v). I found that it was clipped the peak when I adjusted higher the P1 & P2.

I used OCR measure output span of ground to R81 (towards Z3 & Z4) saw the output swing 10v positive and negative at about 0v. Nevertheless, I switch OCR input channel to "DC" then have same output but shifted upward 28V DC.

Can anyone help me to solve the gain problem ? If you need a further info or data just let me know.

Thanks for your kindly help.


BobEllis 29th August 2005 12:08 PM


If I uynderstand you correctly, you have a voltage gain of 20 (27db), which is normal for this amp. Less than 2 V p-p (most CD players will output this much) will drive it to full output. If need more gain use a preamp.

What is odd is that with 50K for R3, no R27 and you did not indicate any changes to R2 or R29, your gain should be much higher. Did you make any changes not noted? With the gain you see, R3 should be around 15K as you noted in post 3

To answer an earlier question, yes, add bypass caps on the rails of each board. This should help the stability.

Note that R21 and R22 should be >75 ohms for stability (page 7 of part 1)

I'm not sure what you mean by OCR, is that a scope? Why are you measuring the voltage across R81? Remember that this amp is DC coupled and will amplify any DC on the input. If switching to DC results in a dc offset on the probes, you are putting DC into the negative input. Have you measured the DC offset at the output terminal?

ckwong99 29th August 2005 06:51 PM

Hello Bob,

It do for my power amp so I prefer to drive it with per-amp.
The V gain about 25-26dB I measured but why the DC supply +/- 50V how I just have this +/- 10v signal outcome but not a +/- 30v signal. Recall that my output stage intend to apply +/- 60VDC, from this point of view, thus power from output stage would never boosted to the maximum by the front end . Do you agree on it ? ( Even I try the other ways increase the gain but end up clipping on the peak would happen.)

R29 replaced by 2k value.
R3 is a 50K VR, I saw it marked on about 13K value. Sorry for my mistake.
OCR I meant for oscilloscope you guess it right. I will not measure voltage between R81. I had just measured output from one end of R81 (which head on Z3&Z4) to GND. (I doesn’t make connection to ground with R31) Is it correct ? Because I verfied the waveform distorted seriously by R31 connected to GND. ( It much thanks to Nelson to give me a clue on pervious post.)

Normally the output can be displayed swinging at about the zero volt axis when “AC” to be selected on OCR. ( The signal was going through implicit capacitor before entry the OCR.) Not sure why I select to “DC” then the whole signal moved upward near to 28VDC.

By the way, I tried to match the differential pairs. Doing so I really to see the output waveform positive / negative cycle looks like to their opposite.

Thanks for you patience.

BobEllis 29th August 2005 07:30 PM

At 26 dB gain, you should have no problem reaching maximum output swing. 2 volts on the input will give you 40V out. Perhaps your source is a high impedance and cannot drive the amp to maximum output. Are you using single ended or balanced inputs? What voltage can your source provide unloaded?

Increasing R3 will increase gain, at the expense of increased distortion because less feedback being applied. Whether it is audible or not remains to be seen. Closed loop gain should be set by the voltage divider formed by R3 and the parallel combination of R2 and R29. Decreasing R29 to the 1.5K specified will also increase gain.

Once you determine the value you want for R3, I suggest that you replace the pot with a fixed resistor. Feedback resistors should be best quality - if you're going to only have one "audiophile grade" resistor, R3 is where to use it.

I presume that you set the offset using a voltmeter and the DC voltage at R81 referenced to ground is <50mV. If this actually changes when you go from AC to DC on your scope, it is because your scope has DC on its input. Is the offset measured with a voltmeter or looking at the scope trace? Check with a VM. I have seen a jump on my scope when changing that settles out in a minute or two. Must be a capacitor charging or discharging somewhere.

ckwong99 30th August 2005 02:00 AM

I have used a mini-signal generator ( A kit bought from market ). Its output direct connect to the input of the circuit. I think the output level would not high enough but I don't know how the impedance of it.

Next, I will try use it input to my preamp first and then take output to the circuit.

I knew the equation of gain, where pressed on the A75's DIY . Somehow the gain it never conform the equation. I can't explain and understand it.

Sure that I will replace some majority components.

The offset measured from the OCR not the DMM. First step to see what the quality and gain of output yield. Second, to balance the DC offset by using DMM. I think DC offset is little bit because the signal centered at about the zero volt axis.

Does it have too large DC level (measured from OCR use "DC") that was be riding on the AC signal according to my experience ? Is it possible ? Or it was abnormal according to your recognize ? Somewhere had capacitor to be charged after I do measure.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:57 PM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2