Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th April 2005, 08:55 AM   #11
Fox is offline Fox  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Fox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Default Balanced and Unbalanced Outputs

Zapped,

If you want both unbalanced and balanced outputs the best way is to follow Nelson's recommendations in the BoSoZ-article. If I remember correctly, Nelson designed the pre-amp to have both balanced (XLR) and unbalanced (RCA) outputs. He used RCAs for each XLR-polarity, resulting in 2 RCAs per channel: XLR pin 1 to RCA-ground of both the RCAs, XLR pin 2 to the positive polarity RCA signal-pin and XLR pin 3 to the negative polarity RCA-signal pin. For single-ended poweramps you would just need to use 1 RCA per channel and because you have both the polarities of the balanced signal available, for each channel you can choose to use the inverting or the non-inverting output.

Hope this makes some sense,

Fox
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2005, 11:23 PM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Seattle
Thank you, Fox. Actuallly, I already have a chassis which has space for one set of XLR inputs, and 4 phono jacks on the input. It also has space for one set of XLR outputs and 2 phono jacks on the output. That's it in terms of space.

I realize this eliminates the possibility of picking inverting or noninverting output when using unbalanced output. but am not concerned with that too much. My real dilemma is how I can use this chassis and whether I have to use switches or shorting jumpers to do so. I have the advantage of a (up to) 6 position, 8 deck switch. A real beauty made by Shallcross in the late 1960's that I bought as new old stock surplus from Fair Radio for $6 a few years back. I am switch-rich here, you might say, but space poor on the chassis.

I appreciate your help.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2005, 02:29 PM   #13
dqswim is offline dqswim  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: il
In my case with an output attenuator (2 pole, one L, one R) between the +, and - outputs when I used the single ended outputs I had to ground the un-used output or I got a nice hum. Took me quite a while and many posts to the forum before I could figure out this problem.

I don't know if this will be the case with your output control but something to keep in mind, or atleast not repeat.

-dave
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rail Switching vs. "predictive" rail switching rtarbell Solid State 5 4th March 2007 11:26 PM
Poll! What do you use in your X-BOSOZ or BOSOZ for Volume Control and Input Selector? promitheus Pass Labs 87 19th February 2006 04:15 PM
To BOSOZ or not to BOSOZ... please comment. spence Pass Labs 2 24th December 2004 08:50 PM
X-bosoz vs. CCS X-bosoz, how does the sound compare? acliao Pass Labs 14 26th February 2004 01:55 AM
BOSOZ source switching with SE relays Gabrielshorn Pass Labs 2 5th February 2004 09:07 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:07 PM.

Page generated in 0.08811 seconds (70.59% PHP - 29.41% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio