|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Netherlands
|
Zapped,
If you want both unbalanced and balanced outputs the best way is to follow Nelson's recommendations in the BoSoZ-article. If I remember correctly, Nelson designed the pre-amp to have both balanced (XLR) and unbalanced (RCA) outputs. He used RCAs for each XLR-polarity, resulting in 2 RCAs per channel: XLR pin 1 to RCA-ground of both the RCAs, XLR pin 2 to the positive polarity RCA signal-pin and XLR pin 3 to the negative polarity RCA-signal pin. For single-ended poweramps you would just need to use 1 RCA per channel and because you have both the polarities of the balanced signal available, for each channel you can choose to use the inverting or the non-inverting output. Hope this makes some sense, Fox |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Seattle
|
Thank you, Fox. Actuallly, I already have a chassis which has space for one set of XLR inputs, and 4 phono jacks on the input. It also has space for one set of XLR outputs and 2 phono jacks on the output. That's it in terms of space.
I realize this eliminates the possibility of picking inverting or noninverting output when using unbalanced output. but am not concerned with that too much. My real dilemma is how I can use this chassis and whether I have to use switches or shorting jumpers to do so. I have the advantage of a (up to) 6 position, 8 deck switch. A real beauty made by Shallcross in the late 1960's that I bought as new old stock surplus from Fair Radio for $6 a few years back. I am switch-rich here, you might say, but space poor on the chassis. I appreciate your help.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: il
|
In my case with an output attenuator (2 pole, one L, one R) between the +, and - outputs when I used the single ended outputs I had to ground the un-used output or I got a nice hum. Took me quite a while and many posts to the forum before I could figure out this problem.
I don't know if this will be the case with your output control but something to keep in mind, or atleast not repeat. -dave |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rail Switching vs. "predictive" rail switching | rtarbell | Solid State | 5 | 4th March 2007 11:26 PM |
| Poll! What do you use in your X-BOSOZ or BOSOZ for Volume Control and Input Selector? | promitheus | Pass Labs | 87 | 19th February 2006 04:15 PM |
| To BOSOZ or not to BOSOZ... please comment. | spence | Pass Labs | 2 | 24th December 2004 08:50 PM |
| X-bosoz vs. CCS X-bosoz, how does the sound compare? | acliao | Pass Labs | 14 | 26th February 2004 01:55 AM |
| BOSOZ source switching with SE relays | Gabrielshorn | Pass Labs | 2 | 5th February 2004 09:07 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08811 seconds (70.59% PHP - 29.41% MySQL) with 11 queries |