Does Pre-Matching 9610's Really Work? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Pass Labs

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th August 2002, 10:37 PM   #1
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
roddyama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
Question Does Pre-Matching 9610's Really Work?

Hi Dale, Guys,

I realized this question was probably in the wrong forum so I re-ask it here.

I went ahead and ordered some extra 9610's (from Dale)
1.)The hope is to build a second Aleph at a later date.
2.)It sticks in the back of my head that in an old thread (un-findable with "Search") Mr. Pass said (not a quote, just from memory) that it does little good to match the differiential FETs. That the Pass method is to substitute 9610's until the DC offset disapears.

Question:
Does any one have experience with matched 9610's providing good results with a low DC offset voltage, or will it still be necessary to try several devices?

Slowly, but surely, I'm getting there.
Rodd Yamas***a
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2002, 10:41 PM   #2
fcel is offline fcel  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: LA County
My understanding is that to obtain low DC offset, the output transistors would have to be matched as closely as possible.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2002, 11:34 PM   #3
The one and only
 
Nelson Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
If you match them for Vgs, then you usually don't
have to go to any extra effort to lower the DC offset
at the output.

Actually substituting devices into a working amplifier is
really the best way to do it, as you can test for a bunch
of performance parameters. It is tedious, but worth it.

Did I mention that we turn the amp off while performing
the substitution?
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th August 2002, 12:54 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Hi Rodd,


I will probably have plenty of input 9610's so I will try to sort in batches of three of four and send out more devices. Maybe you can report back on your success in doing this. I would expect that you would still want devices that match pretty close on Vgs.

Dale
__________________
doing my part to Keep Austin Wierd.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th August 2002, 01:02 AM   #5
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
roddyama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
Hi Dale,

Thanks, much appreciated.

Rodd Yamas***a
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2003, 04:32 PM   #6
Asen is offline Asen  Bulgaria
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sofia
Send a message via MSN to Asen
Mr. Pass

Once you said you substitute the input devices in order to obtain lower distortion, not lower offset. From your experience, do they go together? I mean the lower offset and the lower distortion, or there are no rules of that kind?

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2003, 05:06 PM   #7
The one and only
 
Nelson Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
I'm sure there's some kind of relationship, but I don't
necessarily count on it. It depends on how much time I
want to devote to an amplifier. If I have lots of time, I'll
sub devices in and out, picking the best measuring combo
for offset, noise, and distortion, or maybe any one of these
three depending on where I'm trying to go. It's a very
tedious process.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2003, 06:21 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
JOE DIRT®'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Brantford, ON
I feel that replacing parts may because of lack of proper Engineering of the circuit but it is the cheapest route in the orginal approach....there are so many variances when designing and building that we have to decide what is best when making a circuit work...hence subbing transistors is the best approach rather than a new board design

DIRT®
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2003, 08:31 PM   #9
The one and only
 
Nelson Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
It might be a design issue, but more commonly it
is the result of imperfect parts, specifically gain devices
which distort or vary with temperature, voltage, current
and so on.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2003, 09:09 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbia, SC
The impact of differing Vgs values will vary depending on what circuit you intend to put them into. Something like an Aleph can tolerate more mis-match than an Aleph-X because the 'back' MOSFET (i.e. the one that takes the NFB and negative phase of a balanced input) is free to swing; its output doesn't go anywhere. If you try a mis-matched input pair in an Aleph-X (or any X, for that matter) the 'other' side will try to swing in order to bring the circuit into balance. Unfortunately, that will cause the outputs that it's hooked to to go along for the ride and the differential voltage offset at the outputs will get lopsided pretty quickly.
That said, it's still a good idea to match inputs, even in a 'normal' Aleph. The front end won't have to work so hard to achieve zero offset (or at least close to it) at the output.

Grey
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Matching 9610 for A3 thomasfw Pass Labs 3 8th April 2008 03:43 AM
Connecting IRF 9610 anders.a Parts 1 27th January 2006 11:16 PM
How do autoformer impedance matching controls work dan4 Solid State 3 12th March 2005 07:51 AM
matching this sub with amp, does this work, I'm not sure A-type Car Audio 3 10th November 2004 06:32 AM
to what values I should go with irfp 9610 elviukai Pass Labs 6 10th June 2003 12:20 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:44 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2